The gendering of entrepreneurship: Theoretical and empirical insights

International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 452-459

  Rouse, Julia ^a   Treanor, Lorna ^b   Fleck, Emma ^c  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

^c and Mass Communication   (United States)

Author keywords

Entrepreneurialism; Entrepreneurship; Feminism; Gender

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880783887     PISSN: 13552554     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-06-2013-0083     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Berglund, K. and Johansson, A.W. (2007), “Entrepreneurship, discourses and conscientization in processes of regional development”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 499–525.
2. Bradley, H. (2007), Gender, Polity Press, Cambridge.
3. Brush, C.G. (2012), “Foreword”, in Hughes, K.D. and Jennings, J.E. (Eds), Global Women's Entrepreneurship Research: Diverse Settings, Questions and Approaches, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton, pp. xiii-xixv.
4. Calás, M.B., Smircich, L. and Bourne, K.A. (2009), “Extending the boundaries: reframing entrepreneurship as social change through feminist perspectives”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 552–569.
5. Crenshaw, K. (1991), “Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color”, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 1241–1299.
6. Davidsson, P. and Gordon, S.R. (2012), “Panel studies of new venture creation: a methods-focused review and suggestions for future research”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 853–876.
7. Evetts, J. (2000), “Analysing career change in women's careers: culture, structure and action dimensions”, Gender Work and Organization, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 57–67.
8. Greene, P. (2008), “Research trends and future avenues”, presentation at the 4th Diana International Research Symposium, Belfast, North Ireland, 4 November.
9. Hakim, C. (2000), Work-Lifestyle Choices in the Twenty-First Century: Preference Theory, Routledge, London.
10. Hays, S. (1996), The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
11. Hughes, K.D. and Jennings, J.E. (2012), “Introduction: showcasing the diversity of women's entrepreneurship research”, in Hughes, K.D. and Jennings, J.E. (Eds), Global Women's Entrepreneurship Research: Diverse Settings, Questions and Approaches, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton, pp. 1–14.
12. Hughes, K.D., Jennings, J.E., Brush, C., Carter, S. and Welter, F. (2012), “Extending women's entrepreneurship research in new directions”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 429–442.
13. Jarvis, H. (2005), “Moving to London time: household coordination and the infrastructure of everyday life”, Time and Society, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 133–154.
14. Leahy, M. and Doughney, J. (2006), “Women, work and preference formation: a critique of Catherine Hakim's preference theory”, Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 37–48.
15. McDowell, L. (2003), “The particularities of place. Geographies of gendered moral responsibilities among Latvian migrant workers in 1950's Britain”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 19–34.
16. Marlow, S., Henry, C. and Carter, S. (2009), “Exploring the impact of gender upon women's business ownership”, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 139–148.
17. Neergaard, H. and Ulhoi, J.P. (2007), “Methodological variety in entrepreneurship research”, in Neergaard, H. and Ulhoi, J.P. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton, PA, pp. 1–16.
18. Rouse, J. and Kitching, J. (2006), “Do enterprise support programmes leave women holding the baby?”, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 5–19.
19. Welter, F. (2010), “Contextualizing entrepreneurship – conceptual challenges and ways forward”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 165–184.