Retraction Note to Mass classification method in mammograms using correlated association rule mining [Neural Comput & Applic, (2013), 23, 273-281, DOI 10.1007/s00521-012-0857-x];Mass classification method in mammograms using correlated association rule mining

Neural Computing and Applications

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 273-281

  Mohanty, Aswini Kumar ^a   Senapati, Manas ^b   Beberta, Swapnasikta ^c   Lenka, Saroj Kumar ^d  

^a SIKSHA O ANUSANDHAN DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b Krupajal Group Of Institutions   (India)

^c BPUT   (India)

^d MODY UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Association rule mining; Digitized mammograms; Gray level cooccurrence matrix; Texture features; The CorClass algorithm

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION RULES; HIGHER ORDER STATISTICS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; TEXTURES; X RAY SCREENS;

ASSOCIATION RULE MININGS (ARM); CLASSIFICATION PROCESS; DIGITIZED MAMMOGRAMS; EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCIES; GRAY LEVEL CO-OCCURRENCE MATRIX; MASS CLASSIFICATIONS; STANDARD DEVIATION; TEXTURE FEATURES;

TEXT MINING;

EID: 84880762552     PISSN: 09410643     EISSN: 14333058     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-015-2084-8     Document Type: Erratum

References (35)

1. Oliver A, Freixenet J, Marti R, Pont J, Perez E, Denton ERE, Zwiggelaar R (2008) A novel breast tissue density classification methodology. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 12(1): 55-65.
2. Bird RE (1990) Professional quality assurance for mammography screening programs. J Radiol 175: 587-605.
3. Cheng HD, Shi XJ, Min R, Hu LM, Cai XP, Du HN (2006) Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms. Pattern Recogn 39: 646-668.
4. Yang SC, Wany CM et al (2005) A computer-aided system for mass detection and classification indigitized mammograms. J Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun 17: 215-228.
5. Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2001) Pattern classification, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.
6. Chan HP, Wei D, Helvie MA, Sahiner B et al (1995) Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space. J Phys Med Biol 40: 857-876.
7. Sahiner B, Petrick N, Chan HP (2001) Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20(12): 1275-1284.
8. Viton JL, Rasigni M, Rasigni G, Liebaria A (1996) Method for characterizing masses in digital mammograms. Opt Eng 35(12): 3453-3459.
9. Lisboa PJG (2000) A review of evidence of health benefits from artificial neural networks in medical intervention. Neural Netw 15: 11-39.
10. Alginahi Y (2004) Computer analysis of composite documents with non-uniform background. PhD thesis, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Windsor, Windsor.
11. Alginahi Y (2008) Thresholding and character recognition in security documents with watermarked background. In: Proceedings of the international conference on digital image computing: techniques and applications, pp 220-225.
12. Zheng B, Chang YH, Wang XH, Good WF (1999) Comparison of artificial neural network and Bayesian belief network in a computer assisted diagnosis scheme for mammography. In: IEEE international conference on neural networks, pp 4181-4185.
13. Sahiner B, Chan HP, Petrick N, Helvie MA, Goodsitt MM (1998) Design of a high-sensitivity classifier based on a genetic algorithm: application to computer-aided diagnosis. Phys Med Biol 43(10): 2853-2871.
14. Agrawal R, Imielinski T, Swami AN (1993) Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In: Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD ICMD. ACM, Washington, DC, pp 207-216.
15. Ribeiro MX, Traina AJM, Balan AGR, Traina C, Jr, Marques PMA (2007) SuGAR: a framework to support mammogram diagnosis. In: IEEE CBMS 2007. Maribor, Slovenia, pp 47-52.
16. Yun J, Zhanhuai L, Yong W, Longbo Z (2005) Joining associative classifier for medical images. HIS, pp 367-372.
17. Tseng SV, Wang M-H, Su J-H (2005) A new method for image classification by using multilevel association rules. Presented at ICDE 05; Tokyo, pp 1180-1187.
18. Zimmermann A, De Raedt L (2004) CorClass: Correlated association rule mining for classification. Proc Discov Sci 3245: 60-72.
19. Alginahi Y, Sid-Ahmed MA, Ahmadi M (2004) Local thresholding of composite documents using multi-layer perception neural network. In: 47th IEEE international midwest symposium on circuits and systems, pp 209-212.
20. Sid-Ahmed MA (1995) Image processing theory, algorithms and architectures, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, New York. Int J Artif Intell Appl 1(3) July 2010.
21. marathon. csee. usf. edu/Mammography/Database. html.
22. Wang X, Smith MR, Rangayyan RM (2004) Mammographic information analysis through association-rule mining. Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering 2004. doi: 10. 1109/CCECE. 2004. 1349689.
23. Roselin R, Thangavel K (2010) Classification ensemble for mammograms using ant-miner. International conference on computing communication and networking technologies (ICCCNT), pp 1-6. doi: 10. 1109/ICCCNT. 2010. 5592607.
24. Dua S, Singh H, Thompson HW (2009) Associative classification of mammograms using weighted rules. Expert Syst Appl 36(5): 9250-9259. doi: 10. 1016/j. eswa. 2008. 12. 050.
25. Rajendran P, Madheswaran M (2010) Novel fuzzy association rule image mining algorithm for medical Decision support system. Int J Comput Appl 1(20): 87-94. doi: 10. 5120/415-613.
26. Kobyliński L, Walczak K Image classification with customized associative classifiers. In: Proceedings of the international multiconference on computer science and information technology, pp 85-91.
27. Lairenjam B, Wasan SK (2009) Neural network with classification based on multiple association rule for classifying mammographic data. In: Proceedings of IDEAL'2009, pp 465-476.
28. Thangavel K, Kaja Mohideen A (2009) Classification of microcalcifications using multi-dimensional genetic association rule miner. Int J Recent Trends Eng 2(2): 233-235.
29. Holmes G, Donkin A, Witten IH (1994) WEKA: a machine learning workbench. In: Proceedings second Australia and New Zealand conference on intelligent information systems, Brisbane, pp 357-361.
30. Veldkamp WJH, Karssemeijer N, Otten JDM, Hendriks JHCL (2000) Automated classification of clustered microcalcifications into malignant and benign types. Med Phys 27(11): 2600-2608.
31. Wei L, Yang Y, Nishikawa RM, Jiang Y (2005) A study on several machine-learning methods for classification of malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24(2): 371-380.
32. Abu-Amara F, Abdel-Qader I (2009) Hybrid mammogram classification using rough set and fuzzy classifier. Int J Biomed Imaging 2009. doi: 10. 1155/2009/680508.
33. Chan H-P, Sahiner B, Patrick N, Helvie MA, Lam KL, Adler DD, Goodsitt MM (1997) Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network. Phys Med Biol 42(3): 549-567.
34. Vibha L, Harshavardhan GM, Pranaw K, Deepa Shenoy P, Venugopal KR, Patnaik LM Classification of mammograms using decision trees, database engineering and applications symposium, IDEAS'06″. doi: 10. 1109/IDEAS. 2006. 14.
35. Thangavel K, Roselin R (2009) Mammogram mining with genetic optimization of ant-miner parameters. Int J Recent Trends Eng 2(3): 67-69.