Public perceptions of animal experimentation across Europe

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 691-703

  von Roten, Fabienne Crettaz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

animal experimentation; cross cultural studies; public perception of nature; public perception of science

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880717505     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662511428045     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allum N,Boy D,Bauer MWBiotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy. Bauer MGaskell G, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002:224-243.
2. Bauer MW.The evolution of public understanding of science - Discourse and comparative evidence.Science, Technology & Society. 2009;14 (2): 221-240.
3. Bauer MW,Allum N,Miller S.What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda.Public Understanding of Science. 2007;16 (1): 79-95.
4. Bauer MW,Durant J,Evans G.European public perceptions of science.International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 1994;6 (2): 163-186.
5. Boy DExposer des idées, questionner des savoirs. Gaillard R, ed. Neuchâtel: Editions Alphil; 2010:29-43.
6. Broida J,Tingley L,Kimball R,Miele J.Personality differences between pro- and anti-vivisectionists.Society & Animals. 1993;1 (2): 129-144.
7. Coleman G.Public perceptions of animal welfare - an international perspective. Presented at the International Animal Welfare Conference; 2008Gold Coast, Australia; 2008.
8. Cothran HAnimal Experimentation: Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press; 2002:.
9. Cressey D.Battle scars.Nature. 2011;470:452-453.
10. Crettaz von Roten F.Mapping perception of animal experimentation: Trend and explanatory factors.Social Science Quarterly. 2008;89 (2): 537-549.
11. Crettaz von Roten F.European attitudes towards animal research: Overview and consequences for science.Science, Technology & Society. 2009;14 (2): 349-364.
12. Demateo E.Animal-rights activists invade Europe.Nature. 2008 1034;451:.
13. Driscoll JW.Attitudes toward animal use.Anthrozoos. 1992;5 (1): 32-39.
14. Durant J,Bauer MW,Gaskell G,Midden C,Liakopoulos M,Scholten LBetween Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology. Dierkes Mvon Grote C, ed. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 2000:131-156.
15. Eldridge J,Gluck J.Gender differences in attitudes toward animal research.Ethics & Behavior. 1996;6 (3): 239-256.
16. Sixth Report on the Statistics on the Number of Animals Used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes in the Member States of the European Union. Brussels: European Commission; 2010:.
17. Evans G,Durant J.The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain.Public Understanding of Science. 1995;4 (1): 57-74.
18. Franklin AAnimals and Modern Cultures: A Sociology of Human-Animal Relations in Modernity. London: SAGE; 1999:.
19. Franzen A,Meyer R.Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000.European Sociological Review. 2010;26 (2): 219-234.
20. Gallup G,Beckstead J.Attitudes toward animal research.American Psychologist. 1988;43:474-476.
21. Galvin SL,Herzog HA.Empathy, gender and attitudes toward the use of animals. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association; 1994New Orleans, LA; 1994.
22. Hagelin J,Carlsson HE,Hau J.An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation: Some factors that may influence the outcome.Public Understanding of Science. 2003;12 (1): 67-81.
23. Herzog HA,Betchart NS,Pittman RB.Gender, sex role orientation, and attitudes toward animals.Anthrozoos. 1991;4 (3): 184-191.
24. Hills AM.The motivational bases of attitudes towards animals.Society & Animals. 1993;1:111-128.
25. Hox JMultilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. 2010) Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications, 2nd edn.New York: Routledge.New York: Routledge; 2010:.
26. Jasanoff SDesigns on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2005:.
27. Jerolmack C.Tracing the profile of animal rights supporters: A preliminary investigation.Society & Animals. 2003;11 (3): 245-263.
28. Macnaghten P.Animals in their nature: A case study on public attitudes to animals, genetic modification and nature.Sociology. 2004;38 (3): 533-551.
29. Mathews S,Herzog HA.Personality and attitudes toward the treatment of animals.Society & Animals. 1997;5 (2): 169-175.
30. Animals in medicine and science. London: Survey requested by the Medical Research Council; 1999:.
31. Views on animal experimentation. London: Survey requested by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills; 2009:.
32. Pardo R,Engelhard M,Hagen K, et al.The role of means and goals in technology acceptance: A differentiated landscape of public perceptions of pharming.EMBO Reports. 2009;10 (10): 1069-1075.
33. Paul E.Us and them: Scientists' and animal rights campaigners' views of the animal experimentation debate.Society & Animals. 1995;3 (1): 1-21.
34. Peek C,Bell N,Dunham C.Gender, gender ideology, and animal rights advocacy.Gender & Society. 1996;10 (4): 464-478.
35. Pifer L.Adolescents and animal research: Stable attitudes or ephemeral opinions?.Public Understanding of Science. 1994;3 (3): 291-307.
36. Pifer L,Shimizu K,Pifer R.Public attitudes toward animal research: Some international comparisons.Society & Animals. 1994;2 (2): 95-113.
37. Plous S.Signs of change within the animal rights movement: Results from a follow-up survey of activists.Journal of Comparative Psychology. 1998;112:48-54.
38. Schuppli C,Weary D.Attitudes towards the use of genetically modified animals in research.Public Understanding of Science. 2010;19 (6): 686-697.
39. Serpell J.Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare.Animal Welfare. 2004;13:145-151.
40. Suran M,Wolinsky H.The end of monkey research?.EMBO Reports. 2009;10 (10): 1080-1082.
41. Special Eurobarometer 224/Wave 63.1: Europeans, Science and Technology. Brussels: Directorate General Research (European Commission); 2005:.
42. Special Eurobarometer 270/Wave 66.1: Attitudes of EU Citizens towards Animal Welfare. Brussels: Directorate General Health and Consumer Protection (European Commission); 2007:.
43. Special Eurobarometer 340/Wave 73.1: Science and Technology. Brussels: Directorate General Research (European Commission); 2010:.
44. Traïni CLa cause animale: 1820-1980, essai de sociologie historique. Paris: PUF; 2011:.
45. Wuensch KL,Poteat GM.Evaluating the morality of animal research: Effects of ethical ideology, gender and purpose.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1998;13:139-150.