Evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of visceral arterial aneurysms after coil embolization

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 493-497

  Iryo, Yasuhiko ^a   Ikushima, Ichiro ^b   Hirai, Toshinori ^a   Yonenaga, Kazuchika ^b   Yamashita, Yasuyuki ^a  

^a KUMAMOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Miyakonojo Med Association Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

3T MRA; Coil embolization; Follow up; Renal artery aneurysm; Splenic artery aneurysm; Visceral artery aneurysm

Indexed keywords

3T MRA; ARTERY ANEURYSM; COIL EMBOLIZATION; FOLLOW-UP; RENAL ARTERY ANEURYSMS; SPLENIC ARTERIES;

ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

PATIENT TREATMENT;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

AGED; ANEURYSM; ARTIFACT; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC USE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KIDNEY ARTERY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; SPLEEN ARTERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANEURYSM; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTIFACTS; CONTRAST MEDIA; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RENAL ARTERY; SPLENIC ARTERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84880716319     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0284185113475920     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kalko Y, Ugurlucan M, Basaran M, et al. Visceral artery aneurysms. Heart Surgery Forum 2006;10:E24-9
2. Ikeda O, Tamura Y, Nakasone Y, et al. Nonoperative management of unruptured visceral artery aneurysm: Treatment by transcatheter coil embolization. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:1212-9
3. Guillon R, Garcier JM, Abergel A, et al. Management of Splenic Artery Aneurysms and False Aneurysms with Endovascular Treatment in 12 Patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2003;26:256-60
4. Wallace RC, Karis JP, Partovi S, et al. Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms. Part I. MR angiographic follow-up of coiled aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1001-8
5. Kaufmann TJ, Huston J 3rd, Mandrekar JN, et al. Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:812-9
6. Liu Q, Lu JP, Wang F, et al. Visceral artery aneurysms: evaluation using 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:826-33
7. Nael K, Saleh R, Lee M, et al. High-Spatial-Resolution Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of abdominal Arteries with Parallel Acquisition at 3.0 T: Initial Experience in 32 Patients. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:W77-85
8. Ferré JC, Carsin-Nicol B, Morandi X, et al. Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils. Eur J Radiol 2009;72:365-9
9. Yamada N, Hayashi K, Murao K, et al. Time-of-flight MR angiography targeted to coiled intracranial aneurysms is more sensitive to residual flow than is digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1154-7
10. Kaufmann TJ, Huston J 3rd, Cloft HJ, et al. A prospective trial of 3T and 1.5T Time-of-flight and contrast enhanced MR angiography in the follow up of coiled intracranial aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:912-8
11. Roy D, Raymond J, Bouthillier A, et al. Endovascular treatment of ophthalmic segment aneurysms with guglielmi detachable coil. Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1207-15
12. Shellock FG, Kanal E. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:477-84
13. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-62
14. Willinek WA, Born M, Simon B, et al. Time-of-flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging-initial experience. Radiology 2003;229:913-20
15. Michaely HJ, Attenberger UI, Kramer H, et al. Abdominal and pelvic MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007;15:301-14
16. Pruessmann KP. Parallel imaging at high field strength: synergies and joint potential. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:237-44
17. Michaely HJ, Nael K, Schoenberg SO, et al. The feasibility of spatial high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the renal arteries at 3.0 T. Rofo 2005;177:800-4
18. Pescarus R, Montreuil B, Bendavid Y. Giant splenic artery aneurysms: case report and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg 2005;42:344-7
19. Pfeiffer T, Reiher L, Grabitz K, et al. Reconstruction for renal artery aneurysm: operative techniques and long-term results. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:293-300
20. Elaassar O, Auriol J, Marquez R, et al. Endovascular techniques for the treatment of renal artery aneurysms. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011;34:926-36
21. Koganemaru M, Abe T, Uchiyama D, et al. Detection of neck recanalization with follow-up contrast-enhanced MR angiography after renal artery aneurysm coil embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010;21:298-300
22. Kai Y, Hamada J, Morioka M, et al. Evaluation of the stability of small ruptured aneurysms with a small neck after embolization with Guglielmi detachable coils: correlation between coil packing ratio and coil compaction. Neurosurgery 2005;56:785-92
23. Hennemeyer CT, Wicklow K, Feinberg DA, et al. In vitro evaluation of platinum Guglielmi detachable coils at 3 T with a porcine model: safety issues and artifacts. Radiology 2001;219:732-7
24. Majoie CB, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, et al. MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1349-56