The timeframe of adaptation to electric vehicle range

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8005 LNCS, Issue PART 2, 2013, Pages 612-620

  Pichelmann, Stefan ^a   Franke, Thomas ^a   Krems, Josef F ^a  

^a CHEMNITZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

adaptation; control beliefs; driving style; electric vehicle; impulsivity; need for cognition; practice; range

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CONTROL BELIEFS; DRIVING STYLES; IMPULSIVITY; NEED FOR COGNITIONS; PRACTICE; RANGE;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

ELECTRIC VEHICLES;

EID: 84880688484     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39262-7_69     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Franke, T., Krems, J.F.: Interacting with limited mobility resources: Psychological range levels in electric vehicle use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practic 48, 109-122 (2013)
2. Franke, T., Neumann, I., Bühler, F., Cocron, P., Krems, J.F.: Experiencing Range in an Electric Vehicle: Understanding Psychological Barriers. Applied Psychology: An International Review 61, 368-391 (2012)
3. Franke, T., Cocron, P., Bühler, F., Neumann, I., Krems, J.F.: Adapting to the range of an electric vehicle - the relation of experience to subjectively available mobility resources. In: Valero Mora, P., Pace, J.F., Mendoza, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, pp. 95-103. Humanist Publications, Lyon (2012)
4. Lints, T.: The essentials of defining adaptation. In: 4th Annual IEEE Systems Conference, pp. 113-116. IEEE Press, New York (2010)
5. OECD ScientificExpert Group: Behavioural adaptations to changes in the road transport system. OECD, Paris (1990)
6. Newell, A., Rosenbloom, P.: Mechanisms of skill acquisitionand the law of practice. In: Anderson, J.R. (ed.) Learning and Cognition, pp. 1-55. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1981)
7. Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84(2), 191-215 (1977)
8. Eysenck, H.J.: A three-factor theory of reminiscence. British Journal of Psychology 56(2-3), 163-182 (1965)
9. Stickgold, R., Walker, M.P.: Memory consolidation and reconsolidation: what is the role of sleep? Trends in Neurosciences 28(8), 408-415 (2005)
10. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E.: The Need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42(1), 116-131 (1982)
11. Coutinho, S., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Skowronski, J.J., Britt, M.A.: Metacognition, need for cognition and use of explanations during ongoing learning and problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences 15(4), 321-337 (2005)
12. Steinhart, Y., Wyver Jr., R.S.: Motivational correlates of need for cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology 39(4), 608-621 (2009)
13. Rotter, J.B.: Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General And Applied 80(1), 1-28 (1966)
14. Broedling, L.A.: Relationship of internal-external control to work motivation and performance in an expectancy model. Journal of Applied Psycholog 60(1), 65-70 (1975)
15. Furnham, A., Ribchester, T.: Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications. Current Psychology 14(3), 179-199 (1995)
16. Chapelle, C., Roberts, C.: Ambiguity tolerance and field independence as predictors of proficiency in English as a second language. Language Learning 36(1), 27-45 (1986)
17. Gregory, D.A.: Impulsivity control and self-regulated learning. Pro Quest, Cambridge (2007)
18. Fuller, R.: The task-capability interface model of the driving process. Recherche Transports Sécurité 66, 45-57 (2000)
19. Vilimek, R., Keinath, A., Schwalm, M.: The MINI E field study - similarities and differences in international everyday driving. In: Stanton, N.A. (ed.) Advances in Human Aspects of Road and Rail Transportation, pp. 363-372. CRC Press, Southampton (2012)
20. Franke, T., Bühler, F., Cocron, P., Neumann, I., Krems, J.F.: Enhancing sustainability of electric vehicles: A field study approach to understanding user acceptance and behavior. In: Sullman, M., Dorn, L. (eds.) Advances in Traffic Psychology, pp. 295-306. Ashgate, Farnham (2012)
21. Cocron, P., Bühler, F., Neumann, I., Franke, T., Krems, J.F., Schwalm, M., Keinath, A.: Methods of evaluating electric vehicles from a user's perspective- the MINI E field trial in Berlin. IET Intelligent Transport System 5(2), 127-133 (2012)
22. Krems, J.F., Weinmann, O., Weber, J., Westermann, D., Albayrak, S. (eds.): Elektromobilität in Metropolregionen: Die Feldstudie MINI E Berlin powered by Vattenfall. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI/ Reihe 12 Nr. 766. VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf (2013)
23. Larminie, J., Lowry, J.: Electric vehicle technology explained. Wiley & Sons, New York (2012)
24. Beier, G.: Kontrollüberzeugungen im Umgang mit Technik. Report Psychologie 9, 684-693 (1999)
25. Dalbert, C.: Die Ungewissheitstoleranzskala: Skaleneigenschaften und Validierungsbefunde. Hallesche Berichte zur Pädagogischen Psychologie 1. Martin-Luther-Universität, Halle-Wittenberg, http://psydok.sulb.uni- saarland.de/volltexte/2004/393/pdf/bericht01.pdf
26. French, D.J., West, R.J., Elander, J., Wilding, J.M.: Decision-making style, driving style, and self-reported involvement in road traffic accidents. Ergonomics 36(6), 627-644 (1993)
27. Bless, H., Wänke, M., Bohner, G., Fellhauer, R.F., Schwarz, N.: Need for Cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 25, 147-154 (1994)
28. Siedler, T., Schupp, J., Spiess, C.K., Wagner, G.G.: RatSWD working paper no. 48. The German Socio-Economic Panel as reference data set (2008) http://ssrn.com/abstract=1445341
29. Grubbs, F.E.: Sample criteria for testing outlying observations. Annals of Mathematical Statistic 21, 27-58 (1950)
30. Cohen, J.: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge, London (1988) Nuclear Safety