The dynamics of urban traffic congestion and the price of parking

Journal of Public Economics

Volumn 105, Issue , 2013, Pages 106-115

  Fosgerau, Mogens ^a,c   de Palma, André ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^c Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

Author keywords

Congestion; Dynamic; Parking; Traffic; Urban

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880683437     PISSN: 00472727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aliprantis C.D., Border K.C. Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker's Guide Vol. 3rd 2006, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
2. Anderson S., de Palma A. The economics of pricing parking. Journal of Urban Economics 2004, 55(1):1-20.
3. Anderson S., de Palma A. Parking in the city. Papers in Regional Science 2007, 86(4):621-632.
4. Arnott R., Inci E. An integrated model of downtown parking and traffic congestion. Journal of Urban Economics 2006, 60(3):418-442.
5. Arnott R., Rowse J. Modeling parking. Journal of Urban Economics 1999, 45(1):97-124.
6. Arnott R., Rowse J. Downtown parking in auto city. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2009, 39(1):1-14.
7. Arnott R., de Palma A., Lindsey R. A temporal and spatial equilibrium analysis of commuter parking. Journal of Public Economics 1991, 45(3):301-335.
8. Arnott R.A., de Palma A., Lindsey R. A structural model of peak-period congestion: a traffic bottleneck with elastic demand. American Economic Review 1993, 83(1):161-179.
9. Calthrop E., Proost S., Van Dender K. Parking policies and road pricing. Urban Studies 2000, 37(1):63-76.
10. Daganzo C.F. Urban gridlock: macroscopic modeling and mitigation approaches. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 2007, 1:49-62.
11. De Borger B., Proost S. A political economy model of road pricing 2010.
12. De Borger B., Wuyts B. Commuting, transport tax reform and the labour market: employer-paid parking and the relative efficiency of revenue recycling instruments. Urban Studies 2009, 46(1):213-233.
13. de Palma A., Fosgerau M. Dynamic traffic modeling. A Handbook of Transport Economics 2011, Edward Elgar. A. de Palma, R. Lindsey, E. Quinet, R. Vickerman (Eds.).
14. de Palma A., Fosgerau M. Random Queues and Risk Averse Users 2011, ENS du Cachan.
15. de Palma A., Lindsey R. Comparison of morning and evening commutes in the Vickrey bottleneck model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2002, 1807(1):26-33.
16. de Palma A., Marchal F., Nesterov Y. METROPOLIS-modular system for dynamic traffic simulation. Transportation Research Record 1997, 178-184.
17. Douglas R.W. A parking model-the effect of supply on demand. American Economist 1975, 19(1):85-86.
18. Dupuit J. De la mesure de lutilit des travaux publics Annales des Ponts et Chausses II (2nd semester), 332-375. International Economic Papers 1844, 2:83-110. (1952).
19. Eliasson J. A cost-benefit analysis of the Stockholm congestion charging system. Transportation Research Part A 2009, 43(4):468-480.
20. Fosgerau M. How a fast lane may replace a congestion toll. Transportation Research Part B 2011, 45(6):845-851.
21. Geroliminis N., Daganzo C.F. Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: some experimental findings. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 2008, 42(9):759-770.
22. Glazer A., Niskanen E. Parking fees and congestion. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1992, 22(1):123-132.
23. Leape J. The London congestion charge. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2006, 20(4):157-176.
24. Lindsey R. Existence, uniqueness, and trip cost function properties of user equilibrium in the bottleneck model with multiple user classes. Transportation Science 2004, 38(3):293-314.
25. Pigou A.C. The Economics of Welfare 1920, Library of Economics and Liberty Macmillan, London, (http://www.econlib.org/library/NPDBooks/Pigou/pgEW.html).
26. Proost S., Van Dender K. Optimal urban transport pricing in the presence of congestion, economies of density and costly public funds. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2008, 42(9):1220-1230.
27. Qian Z.S., Xiao F.E., Zhang H. Managing morning commute traffic with parking. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 2012, 7:894-916.
28. Rotaris L., Danielis R., Marcucci E., Massiani J. The urban road pricing scheme to curb pollution in Milan, Italy: description, impacts and preliminary cost-benefit analysis assessment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2010, 44(5):359-375.
29. Schrank D., Eisele B., Lomax T. TTI's 2012 Urban Mobility Report Technical Report 2012, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University College Station.
30. Shoup D. The High Cost of Free Parking 2005, Planners Press, American Planning Association, Chicago, Illinois, Washington D.C.
31. Small K. The scheduling of consumer activities: work trips. American Economic Review 1982, 72(3):467-479.
32. van den Berg V., Verhoef E.T. Winning or losing from dynamic bottleneck congestion pricing?: the distributional effects of road pricing with heterogeneity in values of time and schedule delay. Journal of Public Economics 2011, 95(7-8):983-992.
33. Van Ommeren J., Wentink D., Dekkers J. The real price of parking policy. Journal of Urban Economics 2011, 70(1):25-31.
34. Verhoef E., Nijkamp P., Rietveld P. The economics of regulatory parking policies: the (IM)possibilities of parking policies in traffic regulation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 1995, 2:141-156.
35. Vickrey W. The economizing of curb parking space. Journal of Urban Economics 1954, 36:42-65. (November), 62-67. Reprinted in, (1994).
36. Vickrey W. Congestion theory and transport investment. American Economic Review 1969, 59(2):251-260.
37. Vickrey W.S. Pricing, metering, and efficiently using urban transportation facilities. Highway Research Record 1973, 476:36-48.
38. Victoria Transport Policy Institute TDM Encyclopedia, Parking Pricing 2012.
39. Zhang X., Yang H., Huang H.-J. Integrated scheduling of daily work activities and morning-evening commutes with bottleneck congestion. Transportation Research Part A 2005, 39(1):41-60.