Characterising CCS learning: The role of quantitative methods and alternative approaches

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 80, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1409-1417

  Markusson, Nils ^a   Chalmers, Hannah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Carbon capture and storage (CCS); Innovation; Learning; Quantitative and qualitative methods

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE APPROACH; ANALYTICAL APPROACH; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; LEARNING; QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE METHODS; QUANTITATIVE METHOD; REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS; TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT;

CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; INNOVATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; INNOVATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

EID: 84880620965     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Carbon Capture and Storage 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York, US. http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/specialreports.htm, B. Metz, O. Davidson, H. de Coninck, M. Loos, L. Meyer (Eds.).
2. Global CCS Institute The Global Status of CCS: 2010, Canberra, Australia 2011.
3. Scottish Centre for Carbon Storage CCS World Map. School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/ccsmap.
4. International Energy Agency, Energy Technology Perspectives 2008. Scenarios and Strategies to 2050, OECD/IEA, Paris, France 2008, 212.
5. International Energy Agency, Technology Roadmap: Caron Capture and Storage, OECD/IEA, Paris, France, 2009, p. 52.
6. Van Alphen K., Hekkert M., Turkenburg W. Accelerating the deployment of carbon capture and storage technologies by strengthening the innovation system. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4(2):396-409.
7. Stephens J. Growing interest in carbon capture and storage (CCS) for climate change mitigation. Sustainability Sci. Pract. Policy 2006, 2(2):4-13.
8. Caching the Carbon the Politics and Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage 2009, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, US. J. Meadowcroft, O. Langhelle (Eds.).
9. Stephens J., Hansson A., Liu Y., de Coninck H., Vajjhala S. Characterizing the international carbon capture and storage community. Global Environ. Chang. 2011, 21(2):379-390.
10. Haszeldine S., Wilkinson M., Markusson N. UKERC Energy Research Atlas Landscape: Carbon capture and storage 2009, http://ukerc.rl.ac.uk/Landscapes/CO2CS.pdf.
11. U.S. Department of Energy, Carbon Sequestration Regional Partnerships http://fossil.energy.gov/sequestration/partnerships/index.html.
12. National Energy Technology Laboratory, Carbon Sequestration: Programme Overview http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/overview/index.html.
13. 2 transport and storage in the Netherlands (CATO) http://www.co2-cato.nl/.
14. BIGCCS, International CCS Research Centre http://www.sintef.no/Projectweb/BIGCCS/.
15. Hansson A., Bryngelsson M. Expert opinions on carbon dioxide capture and storage-a framing of uncertainties and possibilities. Energy Policy 2009, 37:2273-2282.
16. 2 capture and storage (CCS) in Europe: an assessment of the key determining factors, part 2. The social acceptability of CCS and the wider impacts and repercussions of its implementation. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2009, 3(3):344 356-344 356.
17. Markusson N., Ishii A., Stephens J. The social and political complexities of learning in CCS demonstration projects. Global Environ. Change 2011, 21(2):293-302.
18. Global CCS Institute, Policies and Legislation Framing Carbon Capture and Storage Globally. Strategic Analysis of the Global Status of Carbon Capture and Storage, Report 3, Canberra 2009.
19. Haan-Kamminga A., Roggenkamp M., Woerdman E. Legal Uncertainties of Carbon Capture and Storage in the EU: Application to the Netherlands, University of Groningen - Faculty of Law - Groningen Centre for Energy Law 2010, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1566863.
20. Groenenberg H., de Coninck H. Effective EU and member state policies for stimulating CCS. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2(4):653-664.
21. Cavanagh A.J., Haszeldine R.S., Blunt M.J. Open or closed? A discussion of the mistaken assumptions in the Economides pressure analysis of carbon sequestration. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. October 2010, 74(1-2):107-110.
22. Gibbins J., Chalmers H. Carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy 2008, 36(12):4317-4322.
23. Figueroa J.D., Fout T., Plasynski S., McIlvried H., Srivastava R.D. Advances in CO2 capture technology-the U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control January 2008, 2(1):9-20.
24. Keating G., Middleton R., Viswanathan H., Stauffer P., Pawar R. How storage uncertainty will drive CCS infrastructure. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:2393-2400.
25. 2 capture and sequestration system: Texas Gulf Coast case study. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:2588-2595.
26. Markusson N., Kern F., Watson J. Assessing CCS viability - a socio-technical framework. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:5744-5751.
27. Allen M.R., Frame D.J., Huntingford C., Jones C.D., Lowe J.A., Meinshausen M., Meinshausen N. Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne. Nature 30 April 2009, 458:1163-1166.
28. The Royal Society, Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty, RS Policy Document 10/09 2009, The Royal Society, London, UK. http://royalsociety.org/Geoengineering-the-climate/.
29. Chalmers H., Gibbins J. Scenarios for CCS deployment in the UK, 2010-2050: what can we learn from the ongoing energy debate?. Presented at the 26th USAEE/IAEE North American Conference, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 24th-27th September 2006 2006.
30. The Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution Energy - the Changing Climate, The Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution's 22nd Report June 2000, http://www.rcep.org.uk/reports/22-energy/22-energyreport.pdf.
31. Department of Trade and Industry Our Energy Future - Creating a Low Carbon Economy, White Paper, HMSO Feb 2003, http://www.dti.gov.uk/energy/energy-policy/energy-white-paper/page21223.html.
32. Department of Trade and Industry, a Strategy for Developing Carbon Abatement Technologies for Fossil Fuel Use 2005, http://www.dti.gov.uk/energy/coal/cfft/cct/pub/catreportlinked.pdf.
33. Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK Demonstration Programme http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/uk_supply/energy_mix/ccs/demo_prog/demo_prog.aspx.
34. Scrase I., Watson J. CCS in the UK: squaring coal with climate change?. Caching the Carbon the Politics and Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage 2009, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, US. J. Meadowcroft, O. Langhelle (Eds.).
35. European Commission The EU Climate Package http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/brief/eu/package_en.htm.
36. Gibbins J., Chalmers H. Towards CCS - how far will the BERR competition take us?. Mod. Power Syst. 2008, 28(9):29-31.
37. Gibbins J., Chalmers H. Preparing for global roll-out: a 'developed country first' demonstration programme for rapid CCS deployment. Energy Policy 2008, 36(2):501-507.
38. McKinsey & Company Carbon Capture & Storage: Assessing the Economics, McKinsey Climate Change Special Initiative 2008, http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/ccsi/pdf/ccs_assessing_the_economics.pdf.
39. Bryngelsson M., Hansson A. Energy policy on shaky ground? A study of CCS-scenarios. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:4673-4680.
40. Carbon Capture and Storage Association, Carbon Capture and Storage: A crucial technology in addressing climate change http://www.ccsassociation.org.uk.
41. de Coninck H. Advocacy for carbon capture and storage could arouse distrust. Nature 21 January 2010, 463:293.
42. Department of Energy and Climate Change A framework for the development of clean coal: consultation response, URN 09D/806, London, UK, Crown Copyright 2009, http://decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/consultations/clean_coal/clean_coal.aspx.
43. Markusson N. The technology that was born old - assessing the disruptiveness of the carbon capture and storage transition, presentation at the conference. Acting with Science, Technology and Medicine 2008, the European Association for the Study of Science and Technology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
44. 2 capture to existing power plants as a fast track climate change mitigation strategy. ASME 3rd international conference on energy sustainability, San Francisco, CA, USA 2009.
45. Winskel M., Markusson N., Jeffrey H., Jablonski S., Candelise C., Ward D., Howarth P. Technology change and energy systems: learning pathways for future sources of energy. UKERC Working paper May 2008.
46. Unruh G. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 2000, 28(12):817-830.
47. Unruh G. Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 2002, 30(4):317-325.
48. Unruh G., Carrillo-Hermosilla J. Globalizing carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 2006, 34(10):1185-1197.
49. Van Alphen K., Van Ruijven J., Kasa S., Hekkert M., Turkenburg W. The performance of the Norwegian carbon dioxide, capture and storage innovation system. Energy Policy 2009, 37(1):43-55.
50. Van Alphen K., Noothout P., Hekkert M., Turkenburg W. Evaluating the development of carbon capture and storage technologies in the United States. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2010, 14(3):971-986.
51. Rubin E., Taylor M., Yeh S., Hounshell D. Learning curves for environmental technology and their importance for climate policy analysis. Energy 2004, 29(9-10):1551-1559.
52. 2 capture. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1(2):188-197.
53. 2 capture. Prog. Energy Combust. 2009, 35(6):457-480.
54. Davison J., Thambimuthu K. An overview of technologies and costs of carbon dioxide capture in power generation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part A: J. Power Energy 2009, 223(3):201-212.
55. Merrow E., Phillips K., Myers C. Understanding Cost Growth and Performance Shortfalls in Pioneer Process Plants, the Rand Corporation, US 1981.
56. 2 capture and storage (CCS) in Europe: an assessment of the key determining factors. Part 1. Scientific, technical and economic dimensions. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2009, 3(3):333-343.
57. Allinson G., Ho M., Neal P., Wiley D. The methodology used for estimating the costs of CCS. Eighth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Trondheim, Norway 2006.
58. Pöyry Energy Ltd. Analysis of Carbon Capture and Storage Cost-Supply Curves for the UK, Oxford, UK 2007.
59. Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change: the Stern Review 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/sternreview_index.htm.
60. Markusson N., Haszeldine S. 'Capture ready' regulation of fossil fuel power plants - betting the UK's carbon emissions on promises of future technology. Energy Policy 2010, 38:6695-6702.
61. Russell S., Williams R. Social shaping of technology: frameworks, findings and implications for policy. Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy 2002, 37-131. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. K. Sørensen, R. Williams (Eds.).
62. Brannen J. Mixed methods research: a discussion paper. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, NCRM Methods Research Review Papers, NCRM/005 2005, 1-30.
63. Brannen J. Mixing methods: the entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2005, 8(3):173-184.