The economics of an integrated CO2 capture and sequestration system: Texas Gulf Coast case study

Energy Procedia

Volumn 4, Issue , 2011, Pages 2588-2595

  King, Carey ^a   Coleman, Stuart ^b   Cohen, Stuart ^c   Gülen, Gürcan ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon capture; Carbon dioxide; Cash flow; Enhanced oil recovery; Saline; Sequestration

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE; COAL; COAL STORAGE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COSTS; ECONOMICS; ELECTRIC LOAD DISPATCHING; ENHANCED RECOVERY; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; GREENHOUSE GASES; OIL FIELDS; OIL WELL FLOODING;

CARBON CAPTURE AND SEQUESTRATIONS; CASH FLOW; ECONOMIC COSTS AND BENEFITS; ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS; ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY; POWER GENERATION DISPATCH; SALINE; SEQUESTRATION;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 79955448406     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.157     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. King, C., et al. Economic Analysis of an Integrated Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide Network for Capture and Enhanced Oil Recovery along the Texas Gulf Coast, Paper ES2009-90415, in American Society of Mechanical Engineers 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability. 2009. San Francisco, California, USA.
2. Holtz, M.H., P.K. Nance, and R.J. Finley, EPRI Technical Report: Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions through Underground CO2 Sequestration in Texas Oil and Gas Reservoirs, TR-XXXXXX, WO4603-04. 1999, EPRI: Palo Alto, CA.
3. Nunez-Lopez, V., et al., Quick-look assessments to identify optimal CO2 EOR storage sites. Environmental Geology, 2008. 54: p. 1695-1706. (Pubitemid 351743667) (Pubitemid 351743667)
4. Davidson, R.M., Post-combustion carbon capture from coal fired plants - solvent scrubbing, ed. I.C.C. Centre. 2007.
5. Heddle, G., H. Herzog, and M. Klett, The Economics of CO2 storage. 2003, Laboratory for Energy and the Environment of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
6. Herzog, H. and H. Javedan, Development of a Carbon Management Geographic Information System (GIS) for the United States: Final Report. DOE Award No. DE-FC26-02NT41622, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Editor. 2010.
7. Ziaii, S., et al., Dynamic operation of amine scrubbing in response to electricity demand and pricing, in 9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Technologies. 2008, Elsevier: Washington, DC.
8. Cohen, S.M., The Implications of Flexible CO2 Capture on the ERCOT Electric Grid, in Mechanical Engineering. 2009, The University of Texas at Austin: Austin. p. 154.
9. ERCOT, 2009 ERCOT Hourly Load Data, 2009-ERCOT-Hourly-Load-Data.xls. 2009.
10. ERCOT, 2010 ERCOT Planning: Long-Term Hourly Peak Demand and Energy Forecast, ERCOT, Editor. 2010: Taylor, TX.
11. EIA, Annual Coal Report - 2008, DOE/EIA-0584 (2008), E.I. Administration, Editor. 2010: Washington, D.C.
12. EIA, Form EIA-923: Power Plant Operations Report, E.I. Administration, Editor. 2007.
13. Cohen, S.M., et al., The Effect of Fossil Fuel Prices on Flexible CO2 Capture Operation, in ASME 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability. 2009: San Francisco, CA.
14. EPA, eGRID2006 version 2.1, E.P. Agency, Editor. 2007.
15. PUCT. Summary of Changes to Generation Capacity (MW) in Texas by Status and Resource Type (updated 12/28/09). 2009 [cited; Available from: http://www.puc.state.tx.us/electric/maps/gen-tables.xls.
16. ARI, Basin Oriented Strategies for CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery: East & Central Texas, A.R. International, Editor. 2006, U.S. Dept. of Energy Office of Fossil Energy - Office of Oil and Natural Gas: Washington, D.C. p. 77.
17. 2 Storage and Sink Enhancement Options. 2003, TVA Public Power Institute.
18. Rubin, E.S., C. Chen, and A.B. Rao, Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage. Energy Policy, 2007. 35: p. 4444-4454. (Pubitemid 46971934) (Pubitemid 46971934)