'Neither agree, nor disagree': A critical analysis of the middle answer category in Voting Advice Applications

International Journal of Electronic Governance

Volumn 5, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 244-263

  Baka, Aphrodite ^a   Figgou, Lia ^a   Triga, Vasiliki ^b  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

Likert scale; Methodological design; Middle point; Social psychology; VAAs; Voting advice applications

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880603254     PISSN: 17427509     EISSN: 17427517     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJEG.2012.051306     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Aardal, B. and van Wijnen, P. (2005) 'Issue voting', in Thomassen, J. (Ed.): The European Voter: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 192-212.
2. Achen, C. (1975) 'Mass political attitudes and the survey response', American Political Science Review, Vol. 69, pp. 1218-1231.
3. Ahuvia, A. (2008) 'Traditional, interpretive, and reception based content analyses: improving the ability of content analysis to address issues of pragmatic and theoretical concern', in Franzosi, R. (Ed.): Content Analysis. What is Content Analysis? Defining the Methodological Playing Field, Vol. 1, Sage Benchmarks in Social Research Methods, London, pp. 185-209.
4. Alwin, D. (1992) 'Information transmission in the survey interview: number of response categories and the reliability of attitude measurement', Sociological Methodology, Vol. 22, pp. 83-118.
5. Armstrong, R.L. (1987) 'The mid-point on a Likert-type scale', Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 64, pp. 359-362.
6. Ayidiya, S. and McClendon, M. (1990) 'Response effects in mail surveys', Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 54, pp. 229-247.
7. Billig, M. (1991) Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology, Sage, London.
8. Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D. and Radley, A. (1988) Ideological Dilemmas, Sage, London.
9. Bishop, G. (1987) 'Experiments with the middle response alternative in survey questions', Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 51, pp. 220-232.
10. Blasius, J. and Thiessen, V. (2000) 'Methodological artifacts in measures of political efficacy and trust: a multiple correspondence analysis', Political Analysis, Vol. 9, pp. 1-20.
11. Cedroni, L. and Garzia, D. (2010) Voting Advice Applications in Europe: The State of the Art, Scripta Web, Napoli.
12. Condor, S. (2007) 'Informational and normative aspects of political attitude avowals: the case of English attitudes towards UK constitutional change', Paper presented at the ISPP Conference, July 2007, Portland, Oregon.
13. Converse, J. M. (1976) 'Predicting no opinion in the polls', Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 515-530.
14. Converse, P. (1964) 'The nature of belief systems in mass publics', in Apter, D. (Ed.): Ideology and Discontent, Free Press, New York, pp. 206-261.
15. Coombs, C.H. and Coombs, L.C. (1976) '"Don't know": item ambiguity or respondent uncertainty?', Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 497-514.
16. Cronbach, L.J. (1946) 'Response sets and test validity', Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 475-494.
17. Curtice, J. and Sandford, M. (2004) 'Does England want devolution too?', in Park, J. et al. (Eds): British Social Attitudes: The 21st Report, Sage, London, pp. 201-219.
18. Dalton, R. and Wattenberg, M. (2000) Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19. Danziger, K. (1997) Naming the Mind: How Psychology Found its Language, Sage, London.
20. Downs, A. (1957) 'An economic theory of political action in a democracy', The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 135-150.
21. DuBois, B. and Burns, J.A. (1975) 'An analysis of the meaning of the question mark response category in attitude scales', Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 35, pp. 869-884.
22. Falkenberry, G.D. and Mason, R. (1978) 'Characteristics of non-opinion and no opinion response groups', Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 42, pp. 533-545.
23. Edwards, D. (1997) Discourse and Cognition, Sage, London.
24. Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992) Discursive Psychology, Sage, London.
25. Figgou, L. (2002) Social psychological and lay understandings of prejudice, racism and discrimination: An exploration of their dilemmatic aspects, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
26. Fivaz, J. and Nadig, G. (2010) 'Impact of Voting Advice Applications (VAAs) on voter turnout and their potential use for civic education', Policy & Internet, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 167-200.
27. Garzia, D. (2010) 'The effects of VAAs on users' voting behaviour: an overview', in Cedroni, L. and Garzia, D. (Eds): Voting Advice Applications in Europe: The State of the Art, Napoli, Scriptaweb, pp. 13-33.
28. Gemenis, K. (2012) 'Estimating parties' policy positions through voting advice applications: some methodological considerations', Acta Politica (forthcoming).
29. George, A. (2008) 'Quantitative and qualitative approaches to content analysis', in Franzosi, R. (Ed.): Content Analysis. What is Content Analysis? Defining the Methodological Playing Field, Vol. 1, Sage Benchmarks in Social Research Methods, London, pp. 222-244.
30. Goldberg, M.E. (1971) 'A cognitive model of innovative behavior: the interaction of product and self-attitudes', Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research, pp. 313-330.
31. Hernández, A., Espejo, B., González-Romá, V. and Gómez-Benito, J. (2001) 'Escalas de respuesta tipo Likert: ¿es relevante la alternativa ≪indiferente≫?', Metodología de Encuestas, Vol. 2, pp. 135-150.
32. Johns, R. (2005) 'One size doesn't fit all: selecting response scales for attitude items', Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 237-264.
33. Kalton, G., Roberts, J. and Holt, T. (1980) 'The effects of offering a middle response opinion with opinion questions', The Statistician, Vol. 29, pp. 65-78.
34. Kaplan, K.J. (1972) 'On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: a suggested modification of the semantic differential technique', Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 77, pp. 361-372.
35. Kleinnijenhuis, J. and van Hoof, A. (2008) 'The influence of internet consultants', Paper Presented at the Voting Advice Applications (VAAs): Between Charlatanism and Political Science Conference, 16 May, Antwerp, Belgium.
36. Klopfer, F.J. and Madden, T.M. (1980) 'The middlemost choice on attitude items: ambivalence, neutrality or uncertainty?', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 6, pp. 97-101.
37. Krosnick, J. (1991) 'Response strategies for coping with the demands of attitude measures in surveys', Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 5, pp. 214-236.
38. Kulas, J.T., Stachowski, A.A. and Haynes, B.A. (2008) 'Middle response functioning in Likertresponses to personality items', Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 22, pp. 251-260.
39. Ladner, A., Felder, G. and Fivaz, J. (2008) 'Are Voting Advice Applications more than toys? First findings on impact and accountability of VAAs', Paper Presented at the Voting Advice Applications (VAAs): Between Charlatanism and Political Science Conference, 16 May, Antwerp, Belgium.
40. Lam, T., Allen, G. and Green, K. (2010) 'Is "neutral" on a Likert scale the same as "Don't know" for informed and uninformed respondents? Effects of serial position and labeling on selection of response options', Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, May 2010, Denver, CA.
41. Likert, R. (1932) 'A technique for the measurement of attitudes', Archives of Psychology, Vol. 140, pp. 1-55.
42. Marschall, S. and Schmidt, C. (2008) 'Preaching to the converted or making a difference? Mobilizing effects of an internet application at the German General Election 2005', in Farrell, D. and Schmitt-Beck, R. (Eds): Non-party Actors in Electoral Politics, pp. 259-278, Nomos, Baden-Baden.
43. Marschall, S. and Schmidt, C. (2010) 'The impact of voting indicators: the case of the German Wahl-O-Mat', in Cedroni, L. and Garzia, D. (Eds): Voting Advice Applications in Europe: The State of the Art, pp. 65-90, Scriptaweb, Napoli.
44. Masters, J.R. (1974) 'The relationship between number of response categories and reliability of Likert-type questionnaires', Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol. 11, pp. 49-53.
45. Moors, G. (2008) 'Exploring the effect of a middle response category on response style in attitude measurement', Quality and Quantity, Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 779-794.
46. Potter, J. and Litton, I. (1985) 'Some problems underlying the theory of social representations', British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 24, pp. 81-90.
47. Presser, S. and Schuman, H. (1980) 'The measurement of a middle position in attitude surveys', Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 44, pp. 70-85.
48. Rabinowitz, G. and Macdonald, S.E. (1989) 'A directional theory of issue voting', The American Political Science Review, Vol. 83, No. 1, pp. 93-121.
49. Ramonait?, A. (2010) 'Voting advice applications in Lithuania: promoting programmatic competition or breeding populism?', Policy & Internet, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 117-147.
50. Rojas, A.J. and Fernández, J.S. (2000) 'Análisis de las alternativas de respuestas intermedias mediante el modelo de escalas de clasificación', Metodología de Encuestas, Vol. 2, pp. 171-183.
51. Ruusuvirta, O. and Rosema, M. (2009) 'Do online vote selectors influence electoral participation and the direction of the vote?', ECPR General Conference, September 2009, Potsdam, Germany.
52. Schuman, H. and Presser, S. (1981) Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys, Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA.
53. Schuman, H. and Presser, S. (1996) Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording and Context, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
54. Shaw, M.E. and Wright, J.M. (1967) Scales for the Measurement of Attitudes, McGraw-Hill, New York.
55. Smith, J. (1995) 'Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis', in Smith, J. et al. (Eds): Rethinking Methods in Psychology, Sage, London, pp. 9-26.
56. Sturgis, P. and Roberts, C. (2011) 'Middle alternatives revisited: How the neither/nor response acts as a way of saying "I don't know"', Sociological Methods and Research. Available online at: http://eprints.soton.ac. uk/197457/1/SMRrevised4.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2012).
57. Sturgis, P. and Smith, P. (2010) 'Fictitious issues revisited: political interest, knowledge and the generation of non-attitudes', Political Studies, Vol. 58, pp. 66-84.
58. Sudman, S. and Bradburn, N. (1974) Response Effects in Surveys, Aldine, Chicago.
59. Thiessen, V. and Blasius, J. (1998) 'Using multiple correspondence analysis to distinguish between substantive and non-substantive responses', in Blasius, J. and Greenacre, M. (Eds): Visualization of Categorical Data, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 239-252.
60. Thurstone, L.L. (1928) 'Attitudes can be measured', American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 33, pp. 529-554.
61. Vassil, K. (2011) 'Role of self-selection in estimating the effects of voting advice applications. Empirical evidence on the basis of Swiss Smartvote data', Paper Presented at the 6th ECPR General Conference, 25-27 August, Reykjavik, Iceland.
62. Velez, P. and Ashworth, S. (2007) 'The impact of item readability on the endorsement of the midpoint response in surveys', Survey Research Methods, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 69-74.
63. Walgrave, S., Van Aelst, P. and Nuytemans, M. (2008a) "'Do the vote test": the electoral effects of a popular vote advice application at the 2004 Belgian elections', Acta Politica, Vol. 43, pp. 50-70.
64. Walgrave, S., Van Aelst, P. and Nuytemans, M. (2008b) 'Vote Advice Applications as new campaign players? The electoral effects of the "Do the Vote Test" during the 2004 regional elections in Belgium', in Farrell, D. and Schmitt-Beck, R. (Eds): Non Party Actors in Electoral Politics. The Role of Interest Groups and Independent Citizens in Contemporary Election Campaigns, Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp. 237-258.
65. Walgrave, S., Nuytemans, M. and Pepermans, K. (2009) 'Voting Aid Applications and the effect of statement selection', West European Politics, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 1161-1180.
66. Wall, M., Sudulich, M., Costello, R. and Leon, E. (2009) 'Picking your party online - an investigation of Ireland's first online voting advice application', Information Polity, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 203-218.
67. Weltman, D. and Billig, M. (2001) 'The political psychology of contemporary anti-politics: a discursive approach to the end-of-ideology era', Political Psychology, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 367-382.