Endorsement of sexist ideology in Taiwan and the United States: Social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, and deferential family norms

International Journal of Psychology

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 254-262

  Lee, I Ching ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Ambivalent sexism theory; Deferential family norms; Right wing authoritarianism; Social dominance orientation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUTHORITY; BENEFICENCE; CULTURAL FACTOR; FAMILY; FEMALE; HOSTILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SEXISM; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; TAIWAN; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ANIMALS; AUTHORITARIANISM; BENEFICENCE; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; FAMILY; FEMALE; HOSTILITY; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SEXISM; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; TAIWAN; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84880574926     PISSN: 00207594     EISSN: 1464066X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207594.2011.645485     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adorno, TW, Frenkel-Brunswik, E, Levenson, DJ and Sanford, RN. 1950. The authoritarian personality, New York, NY: Norton.
2. Allport, G. 1954. The nature of prejudice, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Altemeyer, B. 1996. The authoritarian specter, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Begany, JJ and Milburn, JA. 2002. Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: Authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myth. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 3: 119 - 126.
5. Christopher, AN and Mull, MS. 2006. Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30: 223 - 230.
6. Duckitt, J. 2001. " A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice ". In Advances in experimental social psychology, Edited by: Zanna, MP. Vol. 33, 41 - 113. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7. Duckitt, J. 2006. Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32: 684 - 696.
8. Gaertner, SL, Dovidio, JF and Bachman, BA. 1996. Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20: 271 - 290.
9. Glick, P and Fiske, ST. 1996. The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 491 - 512.
10. Glick, P and Fiske, ST. 1997. Hostile and benevolent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21: 119 - 135.
11. Glick, P, Fiske, ST, Mladinic, A, Saiz, JL, Abrams, D Masser, B. 2000. Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79: 763 - 775.
12. Lee, IC, Pratto, F and Li, MC. 2007. Social relationships and sexism in the United States and Taiwan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38: 595 - 612.
13. Markus, HR and Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98: 224 - 253.
14. Masser, BM and Abrams, D. 2004. Reinforcing the glass ceiling: The consequences of hostile sexism for female managerial candidates. Sex Roles, 51: 609 - 615.
15. Pratto, F, Sidanius, J, Stallworth, LM and Malle, BF. 1994. Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67: 741 - 763.
16. Preston, CC and Colman, AM. 2000. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104: 1 - 15.
17. Sakall, N. 2001. Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: The effects of patriarchy, sexism, and sex differences. Sex Roles, 44: 599 - 610.
18. Sherif, M and Sherif, CW. 1966. Groups in harmony and tension: An integration of studies on intergroup relations, New York, NY: Octagon Books.
19. Sibley, CG, Overall, NC and Duckitt, J. 2007a. When women become more hostilely sexist toward their gender: The system-justifying effect of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 57: 743 - 754.
20. Sibley, CG, Wilson, MS and Duckitt, J. 2007b. Antecedents of men's hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33: 160 - 172.
21. Trandis, HC, McCusker, C and Hui, CH. 1990. Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 1006 - 1020.
22. Viki, GT, Abrams, D and Hutchison, P. 2003. The "true" romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49: 533 - 537.
23. Viki, GT, Abrams, D and Masser, B. 2004. Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length. Law and Human Behavior, 28: 295 - 303.
24. Wright, EO, Baxter, J and Birkelund, GE. 1995. The gender gap in workplace authority: A cross-national study. American Sociological Review, 60: 407 - 435.
25. Zhang, YB, Lin, MC, Nonaka, A and Beom, K. 2005. Harmony, hierarchy, and conservatism: A cross-cultural comparison of Confucian values in China, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. Communication Research Report, 22: 107 - 115.