What are they talking about? Findings from an analysis of the discourse in Peer-Led Team Learning in general chemistry

Learning in the Disciplines: ICLS 2010 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 773-777

  Brown, Patrick ^a   Sawyer, Keith R ^a   Frey, Regina ^a   Luesse, Sarah ^a   Gealy, Daniel ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE CONVERSATION; GENERAL CHEMISTRY; PEER LEADERS; STRUCTURED METHOD; STUDENT LEARNING; TEAM LEARNING; UNDERGRADUATE CHEMISTRY;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84880549219     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Beals, D. E., & Tabors, P. O. (1995). Arboretum, bureaucratic, and carbohydrates: Preschoolers' exposure to rare vocabulary at home. First Language, 15, 57-76.
3. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Brown, P., Sawyer, K. R., Frey, R. (2009a, Oct). Peer-led team learning in general chemistry: Investigating the discourse of peer leaders and students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-western educational Research Association Conference, St. Louis, MO.
5. Brown, P., Sawyer, K. R., Frey, R. (2009b, April). Investigating peer-leader discourse in peer-led team learning in general chemistry. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
6. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition & Instruction, 20(4), 399.
7. Gafney, L., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2008). Peer-led team learning: Evaluation, dissemination, and institutionalization of a college level initiative. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
8. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
9. Gosser, D. K., Cracolice, M., Kampmeier, J., Roth, V., Strozak, V., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2001). Peer-Led Team Learning: A guidebook. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Gosser, D. K., & Roth, V. (1998). The workshop chemistry project: Peer-led team learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(2), 185-187.
11. Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in Activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79-96). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Hockings, S. C., DeAngelis, K. J., & Frey, R. F. (2008). Peer-led team learning in general chemistry: Implementation and evaluation. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(7), 990-996.
13. Lunn, M. (1998). Applying simple k-sample tests to conditional probabilities for competition risks in a clinical trial. Biometrics, 54, 1662-1672.
14. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Rogoff, B., Matusov, E., & White, C. (1996). Models of teaching and learning: participating in a community of learners. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Handbook of education and human development (pp. 338-414). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
16. Sarquis, J. L., Dixon, L. J., Gosser, D. K., Kampmeier, J. A., Roth, V., Strozak, V. S., et al. (2001). The workshop project: Peer-led team learning in chemistry. In J. E. Miller, J. E. Groccia & M. S. Miller (Eds.), Student-Assisted Teaching (pp. 150-156). Boston: Anker.
17. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Analyzing collaborative discourse. In K. R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Science (pp. 187-204). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.