Conceptual relations between expanded rank data and models of the unexpanded rank data

Journal of Choice Modelling

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 38-80

  Marley, A A J ^a,b   Islam, T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Best worst choice; Choice models; Micro generation; Probabilistic choice; Rank expansions; Ranking; Renewable energy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880544693     PISSN: 17555345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70052-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Agarwal, S., C. Burgess, and K. Crammer (2009) Advances in Ranking. Work-shop, Twenty-Third Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Whistler, BC, December 11, 2009.
2. Bateman, H., T. Islam, J. Louviere, S. Satchell and S. Thorp (2011) Retire- ment investor risk tolerance in tranquil and crisis periods: experimental survey evidence. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 12 201-218.
3. Collins, A. T. and J. M. Rose (2011) Estimation of stochastic scale with best-worst data. Manuscript, University of Sydney.
4. Doignon, J.-P., A. Pekeč, and R. Regenwetter (2004) The repeated insertion model for rankings: missing link between two subset choice models. Psychome-trika, 69 33-54. (Pubitemid 39436522)
5. Ebling, C., B. Frischknecht and J. Louviere (2010) Keep it simple: Easy ways to estimate choice models for single consumers. In P. Ballantine and J. Finsterwalder (Eds.) Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, pp. 1-7. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
6. Fiebig, D. G., M. P. Keane, J. Louviere, J. and N. Wasi (2010) The general- ized multinomial logit model: Accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 29 393-421.
7. Finn, A. and Louviere, J. J. (1992) Determining the appropriate response to evidence of public concern: The case of food safety. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 11 12-25.
8. Huber, P. J. (1963) Pairwise comparison and ranking: optimum properties of the row sum procedure. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34 511-520.
9. Garcia-Lapresta, J. L., A. A. J. Marley and M. Martinez-Panero (2010) Char- acterizing best-worst voting systems in the scoring context. Social Choice and Welfare, 34 487-496.
10. Islam, T., J. Louviere, J. and Pihlens, D. (2009) Aggregate choice and individ-ual models: A comparison of top-down and bottom-up approaches. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Conference, March 2009. Sawtooth Software Inc.
11. Lam, K. Y., A. J. Koning and P. H. Franses, (2011) Estimating independent locally shifted ranking utility models of ranking data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46 756-778.
12. Lancsar, E. and J. J.Louviere (2009) Estimating individual level discrete choice models and welfare measures using best worst choice experiments, CenSoC Working Paper No. 08-003, University of Technology, Sydney.
13. J. Louviere, T.N. Flynn and A. A. J. Marley (2012) Best-worst scaling: Theory, methods and applications. Manuscript, University of Technology, Sydney.
14. Louviere, J. J. and Islam, T. (2008) A Comparison of importance weights/measures derived from choice-based conjoint, constant sum scales and best worst scaling. Journal of Business Research, 61 903-911.
15. Louviere, J. J. and G. Woodworth (1990) Best-worst scaling: A model for largest difference judgments. Working Paper, Faculty of Business, University of Alberta.
16. Louviere, J. J., D. Street, L. Burgess, N. Wasi, T. Islam and A. A. J. Marley, A. A. J. (2008) Modeling the choices of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference information. Journal of Choice Modelling,1 126-163.
17. Luce, R. D. and P. Suppes (1965) Preference, utility, and subjective proba-bility. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush and E. Galanter. (Eds.). Handbook of Mathe-matical Psychology, Vol. III. New Youk, NY: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 235-406.
18. Magidson, J. and Vermunt, J. K. (2007) Removing the scale factor confound in multinomial logit choice models to obtain better estimates of preference.Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings.
19. Marley, A. A. J. (1968) Some probabilistic models of simple choice and rank-ing. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 5 311-332.
20. Marley, A. A. J., and J. J. Louviere (2005) Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best-worst choices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 49 464-480. (Pubitemid 43046070)
21. Marley, A. A. J., and D. Pihlens (2012) Models of best-worst choice and ranking among, and in, multiattribute options (profiles). Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56 24-34.
22. Saari, D. G. (2008) Disposing dictators, demystifying voting paradoxes. Cam-bridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
23. Scarpa, R. and A. A. J. Marley (2011) Exploring the consistency of alternative best and/or worst ranking procedures. Presentation, Second International Choice Conference, Leeds, July 4-6, 2011.
24. Scarpa, R., S. Notaro, R. Raffelli, D, Pihlens and J. Louviere (2011) Exploring scale effects of best/worst rank ordered choice data to estimate visitors's benefits from alpine transhumance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93 809-824.
25. Shafir, E. (1993) Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse. Memory and Cognition, 21 546-556. (Pubitemid 23191412)
26. Vermut, J. K. and J. Magidson (2005) Technical Guide for Latent GOLD Choice 4.0: Basic and Advanced. Belmont Massachusetts: Statistical Innova-tions.