Continuity of GP care is related to reduced specialist healthcare use: A cross-sectional survey

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 63, Issue 612, 2013, Pages

  Hansen, Anne Helen ^c   Halvorsen, Peder A ^a   Aaraas, Ivar J ^a   Førde, Olav Helge ^b  

^a National Centre of Rural Medicine   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH NORWAY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Continuity of patient care; Cross sectional study; General practitioner; Hospitalisation; Norway; Primary health care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SERVICE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; OUTPATIENT CARE; PATIENT CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW;

CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84880538318     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X669202     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, et al. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ 2003; 327(7425): 1219-1221.
2. Hjortdahl P, Lærum E. Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction. BMJ 1992; 304(6837): 1287-1290.
3. Aboulghate A, Abel G, Elliott MN, et al. Do English patients want continuity, and do they receive it? Br J Gen Pract 2012; DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X653624.
4. O'Connor PJ, Desai J, Rush WA, et al. Is having a regular provider for diabetes care related to intensity of care and glycemic control? J Fam Pract 1998; 47(4): 290-297.
5. Saultz JW, Abledaiwi W. Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2(5): 445-451.
6. Sturmberg JP, Schattner P. Personal doctoring. Its impact on continuity of care as measured by the comprehensiveness of care score. Aust Fam Physician 2001; 30(5): 513-518.
7. Wolinsky FD, Bentler SE, Liu L, et al. Continuity of care with a primary care physician and mortality in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2010; 65(4): 421-428.
8. Menec VH, Sirski M, Attawar D. Does continuity of care matter in a universally insured population? Health Serv Res 2005; 40(2): 389-400.
9. Chauhan M, Bankart MJ, Labeit A, Baker R. Characteristics of general practices associated with numbers of elective admissions. J Public Health 2012; 34(4): 584-590.
10. Cabana MD, Jee SH. Does continuity of care improve patient outcomes? J Fam Pract 2004; 53(12): 974-980.
11. Saultz JW, Lochner J. Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3(2): 159-166.
12. Freeman G, Hughes J. Continuity of care and the patient experience. GP inquiry paper. London: The King's Fund 2010. http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/ files/kf/field/field-document/continuity-care-patient-experience-gp-inquiry- research-paper-mar11.pdf (accessed 22 May 2013).
13. Vedsted P, Olesen F. Are the serious problems in cancer survival partly rooted in gatekeeper principles? An ecologic study. Br J Gen Pract 2011; DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X588484.
14. Gray DP, Evans P, Sweeney K, et al. Towards a theory of continuity of care. J R Soc Med 2003; 96: 160-166.
15. Finnvold JE, Svalund J. Kontinuitet mellom lege og pasient: blanda resultat av fastlegereforma (Continuity between doctor and patient: mixed results of the GP reform). In Samfunnsspeilet 2/2004. Tønder JK, Ellingsen D, Kirkeberg MI (eds.). Statistics Norway 2004; 2: 27-33. (In Norwegian).
16. Guthrie B, Saultz JW, Freeman GK, Haggerty JL. Continuity of care matters. BMJ 2008; 337: a867.
17. The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service (NAV). http://www.nav.no/Om+NAV/ Tall+og+analyse/Annen+statistikk/Helsetjenester/Fastlegeordningen/ Fastlegeordningen/Lister+per+31.+desember+2008%2C+etter+praksisfylke.184189.cms (accessed 22 May 2013).
18. Farbrot A. Fastlegen fortsatt på topp. (GP still on top). http://www.forskning.no/artikler/2012/juni/323777 (accessed 22 May 2013).
19. The Norwegian Directorate of Health. Fastlegestatistikken 2011. http://www.helsedirektoratet.no/finansiering/refusjonsordninger/ tall-og-analyser/fastlege/Sider/fastlegestatistikken-2011.aspx (accessed 22 May 2013).
20. Norwegian survey of living conditions 2008. http://nsddata.nsd.uib.no/ webview/index.jsp?study=http%3A%2F%2Fnsddata.nsd.uib. no%3A80%2Fobj%2FfStudy%2FNSD1327&studydoc=http%3A%2F%2Fnsddata.nsd.uib. no%3A80%2Fobj%2FfStudy%2FNSD1327&mode=documentation&submode= abstract&v=2&top=yes (accessed 18 Febr 2013).
21. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 2005; 83(3): 457-502.
22. Carlsen B, Norheim OF. Introduction of the patient-list system in general practice. Changes in Norwegian physician's perception of their gatekeeper role. Scand J Prim Health Care 2003; 21(4): 209-213.
23. Førde OH, Breidablikk HJ, Øgar P. Truar skilnadene i tilvisingsratar målet om likeverdige helsetenester? (Are the differences in referral rates a threat to the goal of equitable health services?) Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 2011; 131: 1878-1881. (In Norwegian).
24. The Tromsø Study website. The sixth Tromsø study. Norway: University of Tromsø. http://en.uit.no/ansatte/organisasjon/artikkel?p- document-id=104991&p-dimension-id=88111&p-menu=42374 (accessed 22 May 2012).
25. Eggen AE, Matiesen EB, Wilsgaard T, et al. The sixth survey of the Tromso Study (Tromso 6) in 2007-08: collaborative research in the interface between clinical medicine and epidemiology: study objectives, design, data collection procedures, and attendance in a multipurpose population-based health survey. Scand J Public Health 2013; 41(1): 65-80.
26. Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol 2007; 17(9): 643-653.
27. Hetlevik Ø, Gjesdal S. Personal continuity of care in Norwegian general practice: A national cross-sectional study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2012; 30(4): 214-221.
28. Reijneveld SA, Stronks K. The validity of self-reported use of health care across socioeconomic strata: a comparison of survey and registration data. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30(6): 1407-1414.
29. Saultz JW. Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care. Ann Fam Med 2003; 1(3): 134-143.
30. Salisbury C, Sampson F, Ridd M, Montgomery AA. How should continuity of care in primary health care be assessed? Br J Gen Pract 2009; DOI:10.3399/bjgp09X420257.
31. Jee SH, Cabana MD. Indices for continuity of care: a systematic review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 2006; 63(2): 158-188.
32. Starfield B. Continuous confusion? Am J Public Health 1980; 70(2): 117-119.
33. Cheng SH, Chen CC, Hou YF. A longitudinal examination of continuity of care and avoidable hospitalization. Evidence from a universal coverage health care system. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170(18): 1671-1677.
34. Finnvold JE, Svalund J. Pasienterfaringer i allmennlegetjenesten før og etter fastlegeordningen (Patient experiences of general practice before and after the GP scheme). Statistics Norway 2005; Report 2005/34. (In Norwegian).
35. Sweeney KG, Gray DP. Patients who do not receive continuity of care from their general practitioner-are they a vulnerable group? Br J Gen Pract 1995; 45(392): 133-135.
36. Iversen T, Kopperud GS. Befolkningens bruk av spesialisthelsetjenester. (Use of specialist health care in Norway). Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 2002; 122: 2199-2203. (In Norwegian).
37. Hjortdahl P, Borchgrevink CF. Continuity of care: influence of general practitioners' knowledge about their patients on use of resources in consultations. BMJ 1991; 303(6811): 1181-1184.
38. DeMaesener JM, DePrins L, Gosset C, Heyerick J. Provider continuity in family medicine: does it make a difference for total health care costs? Ann Fam Med 2003; 1(3): 144-148.
39. Carmody P, Whitford DL. Telephone survey of private patients' views on continuity of care and registration with general practice in Ireland. BMC Fam Pract 2007; 8: 17.
40. Heje HN, Vedsted P, Sokolowski I, Olesen F. Patient characteristics associated with differences in patients' evaluation of their general practitioner. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 178.
41. Wensing M, Grol R, Asberg J, et al. Does the health status of chronically ill patients predict their judgements of the quality of general practice care? Qual Life Res 1997; 6(4): 293-299.
42. Finnvold JE. Kommunale helsetilbud: Organisering, ulikhet og kontinuitet (Municipal health services: organisation, diversity, and continuity). Statistics Norway 1996; Report 96/6. (In Norwegian).
43. The Norwegian Health Economics Administration. http://www.helfo.no/ privatperson/fastlegeordningen/Sider/602-000-byttet-fastlege-i-2011.aspx (accessed 22 May 2012).
44. Breidablikk HJ, Meland E. Pasientenes syn på fastlegeordningen- entusiasme med forbehold (Patients' views on the GP scheme-conditional enthusiasm). Utposten 2004; 33(7): 36-38. (In Norwegian).
45. Hansen AH, Halvorsen PA, Ringberg U, Førde OH. Socio-economic inequalities in health care utilisation in Norway: a population based cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12: 336.
46. Hansen AH, Halvorsen PA, Førde OH. The ecology of medical care in Norway: wide use of general practitioners may not necessarily keep patients out of hospitals. J Public Health Res 2012; 1: e28.
47. Mainous AG 3rd, Baker R, Love MM, et al. Continuity of care and trust in one's physician: evidence from primary care in the United States and the United Kingdom. Fam Med 2001; 33(1): 22-27.