Two-dimensional simulation of organic bulk heterojunction solar cell: Influence of the morphology

Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 5164-5169

  Raba, Adam ^a   Cordan, Anne Sophie ^a   Leroy, Yann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

Efficiency and Performance; Finite Element; Modeling; Morphology; Organic Photovoltaics

Indexed keywords

DRIFTDIFFUSION EQUATIONS; EFFICIENCY AND PERFORMANCE; EXPERIMENTAL OBSERVATION; ORGANIC BULK-HETEROJUNCTION SOLAR CELLS; ORGANIC PHOTOVOLTAICS; POWER CONVERSION EFFICIENCIES; TWO DIMENSIONAL MODEL; TWO-DIMENSIONAL SIMULATIONS;

EXCITONS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; HETEROJUNCTIONS; MODELS; MORPHOLOGY; SOLAR CELLS; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

INTERFACE STATES;

NANOMATERIAL; ORGANIC COMPOUND;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; POWER SUPPLY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SOLAR ENERGY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLIES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; NANOSTRUCTURES; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; SOLAR ENERGY;

EID: 84880536574     PISSN: 15334880     EISSN: 15334899     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2013.7501     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. M. Green, K. Emery, and Y. Hishikawa, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 20, 12 (2012).
2. R. Sokel, J. Appl. Phys. 53, 7414 (1982).
3. M. Limpinsel, A. Wagenpfahl, M. Mingebach, and C. Deibel, Phys. Rev. B 81, 1 (2010).
4. C. Groves, J. C. Blakesley, and N. C. Greenham, Nano Lett. 10, 1063 (2010).
5. W. Pasveer, J. Cottaar, C. Tanase, R. Coehoorn, P. Bobbert, P. Blom, D. de Leeuw, and M. Michels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 1 (2005).
6. L. Koster, E. Smits, V. Mihailetchi, and P. Blom, Phys. Rev. B 72, 1 (2005).
7. COMSOL, Multiphysics Reference Manual, version 4.2a, Comsol AB (2011).
8. G. A. Buxton and N. Clarke, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 15, 13 (2007).
9. Y. Min Nam, J. Huh, and W. Ho Jo, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 94, 1118 (2010).
10. B. Ray, P. R. Nair, and M. A. Alam, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 95, 3287 (2011).
11. J. Williams and A. B. Walker, Nanotechnology 19, 424011 (2008).
12. J. Barker, C. Ramsdale, and N. Greenham, Phys. Rev. B 67, 1 (2003).
13. C. Falco, M. Porro, R. Sacco, and M. Verri, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 245-246, 102 (2012).
14. H. K. Kodali and B. Ganapathysubramanian, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 20, 035015 (2012).
15. J. Guo, H. Ohkita, H. Benten, and S. Ito, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 6154 (2010).
16. M. Langevin, Journal de Physique Théorique et Appliquée 4, 322 (1905).
17. A. Raba, A.-S. Cordan, and Y. Leroy, The Theoretical Details Concerning the Implementation of CT State Model Will be Found in a Forthcoming 9 Publication, Manuscript in Preparation.
18. N. D. Treat, M. A. Brady, G. Smith, M. F. Toney, E. J. Kramer, C. J. Hawker, and M. L. Chabinyc, Advanced Energy Materials 1, 82 (2011).
19. T. J. Prosa, M. J. Winokur, J. Moulton, P. Smith, and A. J. Heeger, Macromolecules 25, 4364 (1992).
20. F. Monestier, J.-J. Simon, P. Torchio, L. Escoubas, F. Flory, S. Bailly, R. de Bettignies, S. Guillerez, and C. Defranoux, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 91, 405 (2007).
21. D. Chen, A. Nakahara, D. Wei, D. Nordlund, and T. P. Russell, Nano Lett. 11, 561 (2011).
22. M. Scharber, D. Mühlbacher, M. Koppe, P. Denk, C. Waldauf, A. Heeger, and C. Brabec, Adv. Mater. 18, 789 (2006).
23. P. E. Shaw, A. Ruseckas, and I. D. W. Samuel, Adv. Mater. 20, 3516 (2008).