Unknown-parent groups in single-step genomic evaluation

Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics

Volumn 130, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 252-258

  Misztal, I ^a   Vitezica, Z G ^b   Legarra, A ^c   Aguilar, I ^d   Swan, A A ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

^d INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA INIA   (Uruguay)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bias; Genomic evaluation; Genomic relationships; Unknown parent groups

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FEMALE; GENOMICS; MALE; PEDIGREE;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENOMICS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE;

EID: 84880511270     PISSN: 09312668     EISSN: 14390388     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12025     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aguilar I., Misztal I. (2008) Technical note: Recursive algorithm for inbreeding coefficients assuming nonzero inbreeding of unknown parents. J. Dairy Sci., 91, 1669-1672.
2. Aguilar I., Misztal I., Johnson D.L., Legarra A., Tsuruta S., Lawlor T.J. (2010) Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J. Dairy Sci., 93, 743-752.
3. Brøndum R.F., Rius-Vilarrasa E., Strandén I., Su G., Guldbrandtsen B., Fikse W.F., Lund M.S. (2011) Reliabilities of genomic prediction using combined reference data of the Nordic Red dairy cattle populations. J. Dairy Sci., 94, 4700-4707.
4. Chen C.Y., Misztal I., Aguilar I., Legarra A., Muir W.M. (2011) Effect of different genomic relationship matrices on accuracy and scale. J. Anim. Sci., 89, 2673-2679.
5. Christensen O., (2012) Compatibility of pedigree-based and marker-based relationship matrices for single-step genetic evaluation. Genet. Sel. Evol., 44, 37.
6. Christensen O., Lund M. (2010) Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped. Genet. Sel. Evol., 42, 2.
7. Christensen O.F., Madsen P., Nielsen B., Ostersen T., Su G. (2012) Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs. Animal, 10, 1565-1571.
8. Colleau J.J., Sargolzaei M. (2011) MIM: An indirect method to assess inbreeding and coancestry in large incomplete pedigrees of selected dairy cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 128, 163-173.
9. Forni S., Aguilar I., Misztal I. (2011) Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information. Genet. Sel. Evol., 43, 1.
10. Harris B.L., Johnson D.L. (2010) Genomic predictions for New Zealand dairy bulls and integration with national genetic evaluation. J. Dairy Sci., 93, 1243-1252.
11. Harris B.L., Winkelman A.M, Johnson D.L. (2012) Large-scale single-step genomic evaluation for milk production traits. Interbull Bull., 46, 20-24.
12. Hayes B.J., Bowman P.J., Chamberlain A.C., Verbyla K., Goddard M.E. (2009) Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Genet. Sel. Evol., 41, 51.
13. Ibáñez-Escriche N., Fernando R.L., Toosi A., Dekkers J.C.M. (2009) Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance. Genet. Sel. Evol., 41, 12.
14. Legarra A., Ducrocq V. (2012) Computational strategies for national integration of phenotypic, genomic, and pedigree data in a single-step best linear unbiased prediction. J. Dairy Sci., 95, 4629-4645.
15. Legarra A., Bertrand J.K., Strabel T., Sapp R.L., Sanchez J.P., Misztal I. (2007) Multi-breed genetic evaluation in a Gelbvieh population. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 124, 286-295.
16. Legarra A., Aguilar I., Misztal I. (2009) A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. J. Dairy Sci., 92, 4656-4663.
17. Lutaaya E., Misztal I., Bertrand J.K., Mabry J.W. (1999) Inbreeding in populations with incomplete pedigrees. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 116, 475-480.
18. Misztal I., Aguilar I., Legarra A., Lawlor T.J. (2010) Choice of parameters for single-step genomic evaluation for type. J. Dairy Sci., 93(suppl. 1), 533.
19. Patry C., Ducrocq V. (2011) Accounting for genomic pre-selection in national BLUP evaluations in dairy cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol., 43, 30.
20. Phocas F., Laloë D. (2004) Should genetic groups be fitted in BLUP evaluation? Practical answer for the French AI beef sire evaluation. Genet. Sel. Evol., 36, 325-345.
21. Pryce J.E., Gredler B., Bolormaa S., Bowman P.J., Egger-Danner C., Fuerst C., Emmerling R., Sölkner J., Goddard M.E., Hayes B.J. (2011) Short communication: Genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population. J. Dairy Sci., 94, 2625-2630.
22. Quaas R.L. (1988) Additive genetic model with groups and relationships. J. Dairy Sci., 71, 1338-1345.
23. Quaas R.L., Pollak E.J. (1981) Modified equations for sire models with groups. J. Dairy Sci., 64, 1868-1872.
24. Simeone R., Misztal I., Aguilar I., Vitezica Z.G. (2012) Evaluation of a multi-line broiler chicken population using a single-step genomic evaluation procedure. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 129, 3-10.
25. Sullivan P.G., Schaeffer L.R. (1994). Fixed versus random genetic groups. In: Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Dept. of Animal & Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, 7-12 August 1994. Vol. 18, pp. 483-486.
26. Theron H.E., Kanfer F.H.J., Rautenbach L. (2002) The effect of phantom parent groups on genetic trend estimation. S. Afric. J. Anim. Sci., 32, 130-135.
27. Thompson R. (1979) Sire evaluation. Biometrics, 39, 339-353.
28. Tsuruta S., Misztal I., Aguilar I., Lawlor T.J. (2011) Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci., 94, 4198-4204.
29. VanRaden P.M. (1992) Accounting for inbreeding and crossbreeding in genetic evaluation of large populations. J. Dairy Sci., 75, 3136-3144.
30. VanRaden P.M. (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci., 91, 4414-4423.
31. VanRaden P.M. (2012) Avoiding bias from genomic pre-selection in converting daughter information across countries. Interbull Bull., 45, 5.
32. VanRaden P.M., Van Tassell C.P., Wiggans G.R., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Schenkel F.S. (2009) Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci., 92, 16-24.
33. VanRaden P.M., Olson K.M., Wiggans G.R., Cole J.B., Tooker M.E. (2011) Genomic inbreeding and relationships among Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss. J. Dairy Sci., 94, 5673-5682.
34. Vitezica Z.G., Aguilar I., Misztal I., Legarra A. (2011) Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection. Genet. Res., 93, 357-366.