Accounting for genomic pre-selection in national BLUP evaluations in dairy cattle

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Patry, Clotilde ^a,b   Ducrocq, Vincent ^a  

^a UMR1313 GÉNÉTIQUE ANIMALE ET BIOLOGIE INTÉGRATIVE   (France)

^b UNCEIA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CATTLE; FUTURE PROSPECT; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HERITABILITY; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOTYPE;

ANIMALIA; BOS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PEDIGREE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FEMALE; GENOMICS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 80455132248     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-30     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Genomic selection. Goddard M, Hayes B, J Anim Breed Genet 2007 124 323 330 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00702.x 18076469 (Pubitemid 350231124)
2. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. VanRaden P, J Dairy Sci 2008 91 4414 4423 10.3168/jds.2007-0980 18946147
3. Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. Misztal I, Legarra A, Aguilar I, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 4648 4655 10.3168/jds.2009-2064 19700728
4. Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ, J Dairy Sci 2010 93 743 752 10.3168/jds.2009-2730 20105546
5. Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped. Christensen O, Lund M, Genet Sel Evol 2010 42 2 10.1186/1297-9686-42-2 20105297
6. Combining genomic and classical information in national BLUP evaluations. Ducrocq V, Liu Z, In Proceedings of the 2009 Interbull meeting: 21-24 August 2009; Barcelona. Edited by Interbull bulletin 2009 2009 40 172 177
7. Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection. Vitezica ZG, Aguilar I, Misztal I, Legarra A, Genet Res (Camb) 2011 1 10
8. International genomic evaluation methods for dairy cattle. VanRaden P, Sullivan P, Genet Sel Evol 2010 42 7 10.1186/1297-9686-42-7 20193071
9. Best Linear Unbiased Estimation and Prediction under a selection model. Henderson CR, Biometrics 1975 31 25
10. Evidence of biases in genetic evaluations due to genomic preselection in dairy cattle. Patry C, Ducrocq V, J Dairy Sci 2011 94 1011 1020 10.3168/jds.2010-3804 21257070
11. Genetic evaluation for herd life in Canada. Jairath L, Dekkers JC, Schaeffer LR, Liu Z, Burnside EB, Kolstad B, J Dairy Sci 1998 81 550 562 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75607-3 9532510 (Pubitemid 128444854)
12. Weighting factors of sire daughter information in international genetic evaluations. Fikse W, Banos G, J Dairy Sci 2001 84 1759 1767 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74611-5 11467826 (Pubitemid 33609739)
13. Genomic selection in New Zealand and the implications for national genetic evaluation. Harris BL, Johnson DL, Spelman RJ, Proceedings of the 36th International Committee for Animal Recording Biennial Session: 16-20 June 2008; Niagara Falls ICAR Technical series 2008 13 325 330
14. Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. Van Raden P, Van Tassell C, Wiggans G, Sonstegard T, Schnabel R, Taylor J, Schenkel F, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 16 24 10.3168/jds.2008-1514 19109259
15. Approximate Reliability of Genetic Evaluations Under an Animal Model. Harris B, Johnson D, J Dairy Sci 1998 81 2723 2728 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98) 75829-1 9812277 (Pubitemid 128444941)
16. Use of bivariate EBV-DGV model to combine genomic and conventional breeding value estimations. Mäntysaari EA, Strandén I, Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production: 1-6 August 2010; Leipzig 2010
17. Incorporation of marker scores into national genetic evaluations. Kachman S, 9th genetic prediction workshop; Kansas City, Missouri federation Bi 2008 92 98
18. Genetic evaluation of Angus cattle for carcass marbling using ultrasound and genomic indicators. MacNeil MD, Nkrumah JD, Woodward BW, Northcutt SL, Journal of Animal Science 2010 88 517 522 10.2527/jas.2009-2022 19897629
19. A modification of Van Raden's index for the blending of genomic breeding values. Edel C, Emmerling R, Götz K-U, Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production: 1-6 August 2010; Leipzig 2010