EU budgetary dynamics: incremental or punctuated equilibrium?

Journal of European Public Policy

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1157-1173

  Citi, Manuele ^a  

^a Department of Business and Politics ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

EU budget; incrementalism; policy dynamics; punctuated equilibrium

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880507966     PISSN: 13501763     EISSN: 14664429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2012.760333     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Baumgartner, F. R. 2009. Punctuated equilibrium in comparative perspective. American Journal of Political Science, 53 (2): 603 - 20. (doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00389.x)
2. Baumgartner, F. R., Foucault, M. and François, A. 2006. Punctuated equilibrium in French budgeting processes. Journal of European Public Policy, 13 (7): 1086 - 103. (doi:10.1080/13501760600924191)
3. Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D. 2002. Policy Dynamics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5. Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, B. D. and Wilkerson, J. 2002. " Studying policy dynamics ". In Policy Dynamics, Edited by: Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D. 29 - 49. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6. Berry, W. D. 1990. The confusing case of budgetary incrementalism: too many meanings for a single concept. The Journal of Politics, 52 (1): 167 - 96. (doi:10.2307/2131424)
7. Breunig, C. 2006. The more things change, the more things stay the same: a comparative analysis of budget punctuations. Journal of European Public Policy, 13 (7): 1069 - 85. (doi:10.1080/13501760600924167)
8. Davis, O. A., Dempster, A. H. and Wildavsky, A. B. 1966. A theory of the budgetary process. American Political Science Review, 60 (3): 529 - 47. (doi:10.2307/1952969)
9. Davis, O. A., Dempster, A. H. and Wildavsky, A. B. 1974. Towards a predictive theory of government expenditure: US domestic appropriations. British Journal of Political Science, 4 (4): 419 - 52. (doi:10.1017/S0007123400009650)
10. Falkner, G. 2011. The EU's Decision Traps: Comparing Policies, Edited by: Falkner, G. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Green-Pedersen, C. and Wilkerson, J. 2006. How agenda-setting attributes shape politics: basic dilemmas, problem attention and health politics developments in Denmark and the US. Journal of European Public Policy, 13 (7): 1039 - 52. (doi:10.1080/13501760600924092)
12. Héritier, A. 1999. Policy-Making and Diversity in Europe: Escape from Deadlock?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Hix, S. 2008. What's Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix it, Cambridge: Polity Press.
14. John, P. 2006. Explaining policy change: the impact of the media, public opinion and political violence on urban budgets in England. Journal of European Public Policy, 13 (7): 1053 - 68. (doi:10.1080/13501760600924118)
15. Jones, B. D., Sulkin, T. and Larsen, H. A. 2003. Policy punctuations in American political institutions. American Political Science Review, 97 (1): 151 - 69. (doi:10.1017/S0003055403000583)
16. Jones, B. D. and Baumgartner, F. R. 2005a. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17. Jones, B. D. and Baumgartner, F. R. 2005b. A model of choice for public policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15 (3): 325 - 51. (doi:10.1093/jopart/mui018)
18. Jones, B. D. 2009. A general empirical law of public budgets: a comparative analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 53 (4): 855 - 73. (doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00405.x)
19. Lindblom, C. E. 1959. The science of "muddling through". Public Administration Review, 19 (2): 79 - 88. (doi:10.2307/973677)
20. Natchez, P. B. and Bupp, I. C. 1973. Policy and priority in the budgetary process. The American Political Science Review, 67 (3): 951 - 63. (doi:10.2307/1958637)
21. Padgett, J. F. 1980. Bounded rationality in budgetary research. The American Political Science Review, 74 (2): 354 - 78. (doi:10.2307/1960632)
22. Princen, S. 2009. Agenda-Setting in the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
23. Scharpf, F. W. 1988. The joint decision trap: lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66 (3): 239 - 78. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1988.tb00694.x)
24. Scharpf, F. W. 2011. " The JDT model: contexts and extensions ". In The EU's Decision Traps: Comparing policies, Edited by: Falkner, G. 217 - 36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Simon, H. A. 1959. Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. The American Economic Review, 49 (3): 253 - 83.
26. Soroka, S., Wlezien, C. and McLean, I. 2006. Public expenditure in the UK: how measures matter. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 169, Part 2: 255-71
27. True, J. L., Jones, B. D. and Baumgartner, F. R. 2007. " Punctuated equilibrium theory: explaining stability and change in policymaking ". In Theories of the Policy Process, Edited by: Sabatier, P. 155 - 88. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
28. Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, Princeton University Press.
29. Walgrave, S., Varone, F. and Dumont, P. 2006. Policy with or without parties? A comparative analysis of policy priorities and policy change in Belgium, 1991 to 2000. Journal of European Public Policy, 13 (7): 1021 - 38. (doi:10.1080/13501760600924035)
30. Wanat, J. 1974. Bases of budgetary incrementalism. The American Political Science Review, 68 (3): 1221 - 28. (doi:10.2307/1959158)
31. Wildavsky, A. B. 1964. The Politics of the Budgetary Process, Boston, MA: Little Brown and Company.