A model of choice for public policy

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 325-351

  Jones, Bryan D ^a   Baumgartner, Frank R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25144504042     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mui018     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Arnold, Douglas. 1990. The logic of congressional action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3. Berry, William D. 1990. The confusing case of budgetary incrementalism: Too many meanings for a single concept. Journal of Politics 52:167-96.
4. Bish, Robert. 1973. The public economy of metropolitan areas. Chicago, IL: Markham.
5. Breunig, Christian. 2003. Distribution of budget changes in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Paper presented at the Western Political Science Meetings, Portland, OR, March 11-13.
6. Buchanan, James M., and Gordon Tullock. 1962. The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7. Cefis, Elena, Matteo Ciccarelli, and Luigi Orsenigo. 2001. The growth affirms: From Gibrat's legacy to Gibrat's fallacy. European Pharmaceuticals Regulation and Innovation System Working Paper.
8. Davis, Otto A., M. A. H. Dempster, and Aaron Wildavsky. 1966. A theory of the budget process. American Political Science Review 60:529-47.
9. _. 1974. Towards a predictive theory of government expenditure: US domestic appropriations. British Journal of Political Science 4:419-52.
10. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper-Row.
11. Fenno, Richard F., Jr. 1966. The power of the purse: Appropriations politics in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown.
12. Gist, John R. 1982. "Stability" and "competition" in budgetary theory. American Political Science Review 76:859-72.
13. Hall, Richard. 1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14. Hammond, Thomas, and Gary J. Miller. 1987. The core of the Constitution. American Political Science Review 81:1155-74.
15. Hayes, Michael T. 1992. Incrementalism and public policy. New York: Longman.
16. Jackson, John E., ed. 1990. Institutions in American Society. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17. John, Peter, and Helen Margetts. 2003. Policy punctuations in the UK. Public Administration 81:411-32.
18. Jones, Bryan D. 2001. Politics and the architecture of choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19. Jones, Bryan D., and Frank R. Baumgartner. 2005. The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20. Jones, Bryan D., Tracy Sulkin, and Heather Larsen. 2003. Policy punctuations in American political institutions. American Political Science Review 97:151-70.
21. Jordan, Meagan. 2003. Punctuations and agendas. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22:345-60.
22. Kiel, Douglas, and Euel Elliott. 1992. Budgets as dynamic systems: Change, variation, time, and budgetary heuristics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2:139-56.
23. Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and legislative organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
24. _. 1998. Pivotal politics: A theory of U.S. lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25. Larkey, Patrick. 1979. Evaluating public programs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Lindblom, Charles. 1959. The "science" of muddling through. Public Administration Review 19:79-88.
27. Mortensen, Peter. 2003. Policy punctuations in Danish local budgeting. Aarhus, Denmark: Institut for Statkunskab, University of Aarhus.
28. Natchez, Peter B., and Irvin C. Bupp. 1973. Policy and priority in the budgetary process. American Political Science Review 67:951-63.
29. North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge.
30. Padgett, John F. 1980. Bounded rationality in budgetary research. American Political Science Review 74:354-72.
31. _. 1981. Hierarchy and ecological control in federal budgetary decision making. American Journal of Sociology 87:75-128.
32. Robinson, Scott. 2004. Punctuated equilibrium, bureaucratization, and budgetary changes in schools. Policy Studies Journal 32:25-39.
33. Rubin, Irene. 1988. New directions in budgetary theory. Albany: State University of New York Press.
34. Schick, Allen. 1995. The federal budget: Politics, policy, process. Washington, DC: Brookings.
35. Simon, Herbert A. 1996. The sciences of the artificial. 3d ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. True, James L., Bryan D. Jones, and Frank R. Baumgartner. 1999. Punctuated equilibrium theory. In Theories of the policy process, ed. Paul Sabbatier, 97-115. Boulder, CO: Westview.
37. Wanat, John. 1974. Bases of budgetary incrementalism. American Political Science Review 68:1221-28.
38. Wildavsky, Aaron. 1964. The politics of the budgetary process. Boston: Little, Brown.