-
1
-
-
0343526849
-
Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion
-
10888955 10.1097/00007632-200007150-00017 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3cvhsFKnsA%3D%3D
-
Suk K, Lee H, Kim N et al (2000) Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine 25:1843-1847
-
(2000)
Spine
, vol.25
, pp. 1843-1847
-
-
Suk, K.1
Lee, H.2
Kim, N.3
-
2
-
-
0027485491
-
The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis
-
8130395 10.1097/00002517-199306060-00001 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7ns1OgsQ%3D%3D
-
Bridwell K, Sedgewick TA, O'Brien M et al (1993) The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 6:461-472
-
(1993)
J Spinal Disord
, vol.6
, pp. 461-472
-
-
Bridwell, K.1
Sedgewick, T.A.2
O'Brien, M.3
-
3
-
-
0027960568
-
Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: A metaanalysis of literature 1970-1993
-
10.1097/00007632-199410151-00002
-
Mardjetko S, Connolly P, Shott S (1994) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a metaanalysis of literature 1970-1993. Spine 19(20):2256-2265
-
(1994)
Spine
, vol.19
, Issue.20
, pp. 2256-2265
-
-
Mardjetko, S.1
Connolly, P.2
Shott, S.3
-
4
-
-
0028036716
-
A historical cohort study of pedicle screw fixation in thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spinal fusions
-
10.1097/00007632-199410151-00005
-
Yaun H, Garfin S, Dickman C et al (1994) A historical cohort study of pedicle screw fixation in thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spinal fusions. Spine 19(20):2279-2296
-
(1994)
Spine
, vol.19
, Issue.20
, pp. 2279-2296
-
-
Yaun, H.1
Garfin, S.2
Dickman, C.3
-
5
-
-
77954886950
-
Life quality after instrumented lumbar fusion in the elderly
-
20436383 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cd656f
-
Becker P, Bretschneider W, Tuschel A et al (2010) Life quality after instrumented lumbar fusion in the elderly. Spine 35:1478-1481
-
(2010)
Spine
, vol.35
, pp. 1478-1481
-
-
Becker, P.1
Bretschneider, W.2
Tuschel, A.3
-
6
-
-
1642457395
-
The argument for instrumented decompressive posterolateral fusion for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis
-
14722410 10.1097/01.BRS.0000111142.76601.1A
-
Fischgrund J (2004) The argument for instrumented decompressive posterolateral fusion for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. Spine 29:173-174
-
(2004)
Spine
, vol.29
, pp. 173-174
-
-
Fischgrund, J.1
-
7
-
-
0026548045
-
Isolated L4-L5 fusions using the variable screw placement system: Unilateral versus bilateral
-
1571614 10.1097/00002517-199203000-00006 1:STN:280:DyaK383ktVSmuw%3D%3D
-
Kabins M, Weinstein J, Spratt K et al (1992) Isolated L4-L5 fusions using the variable screw placement system: unilateral versus bilateral. J Spinal Disord 5:39-49
-
(1992)
J Spinal Disord
, vol.5
, pp. 39-49
-
-
Kabins, M.1
Weinstein, J.2
Spratt, K.3
-
8
-
-
33847083437
-
A prospective randomized study of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis
-
17304127 10.1097/01.brs.0000255023.56466.44
-
Fernandez-Fairen M, Sala P, Ramirez H et al (2007) A prospective randomized study of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 32:395-401
-
(2007)
Spine
, vol.32
, pp. 395-401
-
-
Fernandez-Fairen, M.1
Sala, P.2
Ramirez, H.3
-
9
-
-
79955854192
-
Short-term outcome of bilateral decompression via a unilateral paramedian approach for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation
-
21598901
-
Feng ZZ, Cao YW, Jiang C et al (2011) Short-term outcome of bilateral decompression via a unilateral paramedian approach for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation. Orthopedics 34(5):364
-
(2011)
Orthopedics
, vol.34
, Issue.5
, pp. 364
-
-
Feng, Z.Z.1
Cao, Y.W.2
Jiang, C.3
-
10
-
-
84859435521
-
Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases
-
22381573 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.01.010
-
Xue H, Tu Y, Cai M (2012) Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine J 12(3):209-215
-
(2012)
Spine J
, vol.12
, Issue.3
, pp. 209-215
-
-
Xue, H.1
Tu, Y.2
Cai, M.3
-
11
-
-
33745725991
-
Clinical and radiological 2-4 year results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2
-
16816765 10.1097/01.brs.0000224530.08481.4e
-
Lauber S, Schulte T, Liljenqvist U et al (2006) Clinical and radiological 2-4 year results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Spine 31:1693-1698
-
(2006)
Spine
, vol.31
, pp. 1693-1698
-
-
Lauber, S.1
Schulte, T.2
Liljenqvist, U.3
-
12
-
-
0042568728
-
Interbody cage devices
-
10.1097/00007632-200301010-00014
-
Zdeblick T, Phillips F (2003) Interbody cage devices. Spine 28:52-57
-
(2003)
Spine
, vol.28
, pp. 52-57
-
-
Zdeblick, T.1
Phillips, F.2
-
13
-
-
15244359411
-
The indications for interbody fusion cages in the treatment of spondylolisthesis: Analysis of 120 cases
-
15767888 10.1097/01.brs.0000155578.62680.dd
-
McAfee P, DeVine J, Chaput C et al (2005) The indications for interbody fusion cages in the treatment of spondylolisthesis: analysis of 120 cases. Spine 30(6):S60-S65
-
(2005)
Spine
, vol.30
, Issue.6
-
-
McAfee, P.1
Devine, J.2
Chaput, C.3
-
14
-
-
0035336848
-
Early retropulsion of titanium-threaded cages after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A report of two cases
-
11337627 10.1097/00007632-200105010-00017 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MvitlGntw%3D%3D
-
Uzi E, Dabby D, Tolessa E et al (2001) Early retropulsion of titanium-threaded cages after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a report of two cases. Spine 26:1073-1075
-
(2001)
Spine
, vol.26
, pp. 1073-1075
-
-
Uzi, E.1
Dabby, D.2
Tolessa, E.3
-
15
-
-
37849049353
-
Biomechanics of unilateral compared with bilateral lumbar pedicle screw fixation for stabilization of unilateral vertebral disease
-
18173346 10.3171/SPI-08/01/044
-
Yucesoy K, Yuksel KZ, Baek S et al (2008) Biomechanics of unilateral compared with bilateral lumbar pedicle screw fixation for stabilization of unilateral vertebral disease. J Neurosurg Spine 8:44-51
-
(2008)
J Neurosurg Spine
, vol.8
, pp. 44-51
-
-
Yucesoy, K.1
Yuksel, K.Z.2
Baek, S.3
-
16
-
-
33645506888
-
Biomechanical analysis of unilateral fixation with interbody cages
-
15706329 10.1097/01.brs.0000153703.80747.16
-
Chen H, Cheung H, Wang W et al (2005) Biomechanical analysis of unilateral fixation with interbody cages. Spine 30:E92-E96
-
(2005)
Spine
, vol.30
-
-
Chen, H.1
Cheung, H.2
Wang, W.3
-
17
-
-
0031050235
-
Biomechanical analysis of multilevel fixation methods in the lumbar spine
-
9122797 10.1097/00007632-199701150-00008 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7otFGgsQ%3D%3D
-
Glazer P, Colliou O, Klisch S et al (1997) Biomechanical analysis of multilevel fixation methods in the lumbar spine. Spine 22:171-182
-
(1997)
Spine
, vol.22
, pp. 171-182
-
-
Glazer, P.1
Colliou, O.2
Klisch, S.3
-
18
-
-
0031911788
-
Interbody cage stabilization in the lumbar spine: Biomechanical evaluation of cage design, posterior instrumentation and bone density
-
9546475 10.1302/0301-620X.80B2.7693 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3gs1Gmsw%3D%3D
-
Lund T, Oxland T, Jost B et al (1998) Interbody cage stabilization in the lumbar spine: biomechanical evaluation of cage design, posterior instrumentation and bone density. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:351-359
-
(1998)
J Bone Joint Surg Br
, vol.80
, pp. 351-359
-
-
Lund, T.1
Oxland, T.2
Jost, B.3
-
19
-
-
13444272952
-
Posterior instrumentation reduces differences in spine stability as a result of different cage orientations an in vitro study
-
15626983 10.1097/01.brs.0000174559.13749.83
-
Wang S, Goel V, Fu C et al (2005) Posterior instrumentation reduces differences in spine stability as a result of different cage orientations an in vitro study. Spine 30:62-67
-
(2005)
Spine
, vol.30
, pp. 62-67
-
-
Wang, S.1
Goel, V.2
Fu, C.3
-
20
-
-
26444505918
-
Cage migration in spondylolisthesis treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using BAK cages
-
16205342 10.1097/01.brs.0000180402.50500.5b
-
Chen L, Yang H, Tang T (2005) Cage migration in spondylolisthesis treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using BAK cages. Spine 30:2171-2175
-
(2005)
Spine
, vol.30
, pp. 2171-2175
-
-
Chen, L.1
Yang, H.2
Tang, T.3
-
21
-
-
61749103065
-
Posterior migration of fusion cages in degenerative lumbar disease treated with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
-
19127150 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181918aae
-
Aoki Y, Yamagata M, Nakajima F et al (2009) Posterior migration of fusion cages in degenerative lumbar disease treated with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 34:E54-E58
-
(2009)
Spine
, vol.34
-
-
Aoki, Y.1
Yamagata, M.2
Nakajima, F.3
-
22
-
-
77956399612
-
Examining risk factors for posterior migration of fusion cages following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A possible limitation of unilateral pedicle screw fixation
-
20809734 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09590
-
Aoki Y, Yamagata M, Nakajima F et al (2010) Examining risk factors for posterior migration of fusion cages following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a possible limitation of unilateral pedicle screw fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 13:381-387
-
(2010)
J Neurosurg Spine
, vol.13
, pp. 381-387
-
-
Aoki, Y.1
Yamagata, M.2
Nakajima, F.3
-
23
-
-
84872190604
-
Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
-
(epub ahead of print)
-
Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, Soeharno H, Tan SB (2012) Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J (epub ahead of print)
-
(2012)
Eur Spine J
-
-
Lee, K.H.1
Yue, W.M.2
Yeo, W.3
Soeharno, H.4
Tan, S.B.5
-
24
-
-
84859351024
-
Commentary: Is bilateral pedicle screw fixation necessary when performing a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion? An analysis of clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and cost
-
22469304 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.03.001
-
Rihn JA (2012) Commentary: is bilateral pedicle screw fixation necessary when performing a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion? An analysis of clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and cost. Spine J 12(3):216-217
-
(2012)
Spine J
, vol.12
, Issue.3
, pp. 216-217
-
-
Rihn, J.A.1
-
25
-
-
33646559889
-
Unilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
-
16599420
-
Beringer W, Mobasser J (2006) Unilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus 20:E4
-
(2006)
Neurosurg Focus
, vol.20
, pp. 4
-
-
Beringer, W.1
Mobasser, J.2
-
26
-
-
29444449943
-
Biomechanical analysis of posterior fixation techniques in a 360 arthrodesis model
-
16371900 10.1097/01.brs.0000190814.11514.5e
-
Burton D, McIff T, Fox T et al (2005) Biomechanical analysis of posterior fixation techniques in a 360 arthrodesis model. Spine 30:2765-2771
-
(2005)
Spine
, vol.30
, pp. 2765-2771
-
-
Burton, D.1
McIff, T.2
Fox, T.3
-
27
-
-
79955057396
-
Osteoloysis in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bone morphogenic protein-2
-
21217443 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e030e0
-
Knox J, Dai J, Orchowski J (2011) Osteoloysis in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bone morphogenic protein-2. Spine 36:672-676
-
(2011)
Spine
, vol.36
, pp. 672-676
-
-
Knox, J.1
Dai, J.2
Orchowski, J.3
-
28
-
-
77951766763
-
Complications related to osteobiologics use in spine surgery
-
20407355 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d81ef2
-
Mroz T, Wang J, Hashimoto R (2010) Complications related to osteobiologics use in spine surgery. Spine 35:S86-S104
-
(2010)
Spine
, vol.35
-
-
Mroz, T.1
Wang, J.2
Hashimoto, R.3
-
29
-
-
70450252282
-
The influence of cage positioning and cage type on cage migration and fusion rates in patients with monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation
-
19475436 10.1007/s00586-009-1036-3
-
Abbushi A, Cabraja M, Thomale UW, Woiciechowsky C, Kroppenstedt SN (2009) The influence of cage positioning and cage type on cage migration and fusion rates in patients with monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation. Eur Spine J 18(11):1621-1628
-
(2009)
Eur Spine J
, vol.18
, Issue.11
, pp. 1621-1628
-
-
Abbushi, A.1
Cabraja, M.2
Thomale, U.W.3
Woiciechowsky, C.4
Kroppenstedt, S.N.5
-
30
-
-
0033954803
-
The use of rhBMP-2 in interbody fusion cages. Definitive evidence of osteoinduction in humans: A preliminary report
-
10703113 10.1097/00007632-200002010-00020 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3c7mslOmug%3D%3D
-
Boden S, Zdeblick T, Sandhu H et al (2000) The use of rhBMP-2 in interbody fusion cages. Definitive evidence of osteoinduction in humans: a preliminary report. Spine 25:376-381
-
(2000)
Spine
, vol.25
, pp. 376-381
-
-
Boden, S.1
Zdeblick, T.2
Sandhu, H.3
-
31
-
-
11144250305
-
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages
-
15363423 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.03.025
-
Haid R, Branch C, Alexander J et al (2004) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages. Spine J 4:527-538
-
(2004)
Spine J
, vol.4
, pp. 527-538
-
-
Haid, R.1
Branch, C.2
Alexander, J.3
-
32
-
-
60849124256
-
Complications in the use of rhBMP-2 in PEEK cages for interbody spinal fusions
-
19057248 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31815ea897
-
Vaidya R, Seth A, Bartol S et al (2008) Complications in the use of rhBMP-2 in PEEK cages for interbody spinal fusions. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:557-562
-
(2008)
J Spinal Disord Tech
, vol.21
, pp. 557-562
-
-
Vaidya, R.1
Seth, A.2
Bartol, S.3
-
33
-
-
84862158765
-
Risk factors for cage retropulsion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: Analysis of 1,070 cases
-
22647991 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318257f12a
-
Kimura H, Shikata J, Odate S et al (2012) Risk factors for cage retropulsion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of 1,070 cases. Spine 37:1164-1169
-
(2012)
Spine
, vol.37
, pp. 1164-1169
-
-
Kimura, H.1
Shikata, J.2
Odate, S.3
-
34
-
-
0032101704
-
The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion: History, techniques, and 2 year follow-up results of a United States prospective, multicenter trial
-
9636981 10.1097/00007632-199806010-00019 1:STN:280:DyaK1czgtVKisg%3D%3D
-
Kuslich S, Ulstrom C, Griffith S et al (1998) The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion: history, techniques, and 2 year follow-up results of a United States prospective, multicenter trial. Spine 23:1267-1278
-
(1998)
Spine
, vol.23
, pp. 1267-1278
-
-
Kuslich, S.1
Ulstrom, C.2
Griffith, S.3
-
35
-
-
84867885642
-
Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion
-
22695245 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182458b2f
-
Le T, Baaj A, Dakwar E et al (2012) Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 37:1268-1273
-
(2012)
Spine
, vol.37
, pp. 1268-1273
-
-
Le, T.1
Baaj, A.2
Dakwar, E.3
-
36
-
-
14844363695
-
A biomechanical study of regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to structural interbody support
-
15507800 10.1097/01.brs.0000143623.18098.e5
-
Lowe T, Hashim S, Wilson L et al (2004) A biomechanical study of regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to structural interbody support. Spine 29:2389-2394
-
(2004)
Spine
, vol.29
, pp. 2389-2394
-
-
Lowe, T.1
Hashim, S.2
Wilson, L.3
-
37
-
-
0027289403
-
Mechanics of interbody spinal fusion. Analysis of critical bone graft area
-
8367768 10.1097/00007632-199306150-00010 1:STN:280:DyaK3sznslWhsw%3D%3D
-
Closkey R, Parsons J, Lee C et al (1993) Mechanics of interbody spinal fusion. Analysis of critical bone graft area. Spine 18:1011-1015
-
(1993)
Spine
, vol.18
, pp. 1011-1015
-
-
Closkey, R.1
Parsons, J.2
Lee, C.3
|