Use of three types of synthetic mesh material in sling surgery: A prospective randomized clinical trial evaluating effectiveness and complications

Scandinavian Journal of Urology

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 217-224

  Okulu, Emrah ^a   Kayigil, Onder ^a   Aldemir, Mustafa ^a   Onen, Efe ^a  

^a ATATURK TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Incontinence; Mixed mesh; Sling surgery; Synthetic mesh; Ultrapro mesh

Indexed keywords

POLYGLACTIN; POLYPROPYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DE NOVO URGENCY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRANULOMA; HUMAN; ICIQ (INCONTINENCE); INCONTINENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MESH SLING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POLYPROPYLENE SUTURE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STRESS INCONTINENCE; URETHRA INJURY; URINE RETENTION; VAGINAL INJURY;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; POLYGLACTIN 910; POLYPROPYLENES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SUBURETHRAL SLINGS; SURGICAL MESH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS;

EID: 84880382137     PISSN: 21681805     EISSN: 21681813     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00365599.2012.733962     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Rodriguez LV, Blander DS, Raz S. New millennium, new slings. Curr Urol Rep 2001;2:399-406
2. Gomelsky A, Dmochowski RR. Biocompatibility assessment of synthetic sling materials for female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 2007;178:1171-81
3. Roth CC, Holley TD, Winters JC. Synthetic slings: Which material, which approach. Curr Opin Urol 2006;16:234-9
4. Deval B, Haab F. Management of the complications of the synthetic slings. Curr Opin Urol 2006;16:240-3
5. Atmaca AF, Serefoglu EC, Eroglu M, Gürdal M, Metin A, Kayigil O. Time-dependent changes in biomechanical properties of four different synthetic materials in a rabbit model and the importance in respect to sling surgery. Urol Int 2008; 81:456-61
6. Hijaz A, Daneshgari F, Sievert KD, Damaser MS. Animal models of female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 2008; 179:2103-10
7. Bazi TM, Hamade RF, Abdallah Hajj Hussein I, Abi Nader K, Jurjus A. Polypropylene midurethral tapes do not have similar biologic and biomechanical performance in the rat. Eur Urol 2007;51:1364-73
8. Niknejad K, Plzak LS, Staskin DR, Loughlin KR. Autologous and synthetic slings for female incontinence. Urol Clin North Am 2002;29:597-611
9. Atis G, Arisan S, Ozagari A, Caskurlu T, Dalkilinc A, Ergenekon E. Tissue reaction of the rat urinary bladder to synthetic mesh materials. ScientificWorld J 2009;9:1046-51
10. O'Sullivan R, Karantanis E, Stevermuer TL, Allen W, Moore KH. Definition of mild, moderate and severe incontinence on the 24-hour pad test. BJOG 2004;111:859-62
11. Sirls LT, Keoleian CM, Korman HJ, Kirkemo AK. The effect of study methodology on reported success rates of the modified Pereyra bladder neck suspension. J Urol 1995;154:1732-5
12. Giberti C, Siracusano S, Gallo F, Cortese P, Ciciliato S. Transvaginal bone-anchored sling procedure: 4 years of follow-up on more than 200 consecutive patients. Urology 2008;72:313-17
13. Cetinel B, Ozkan B, Can G. The validation study of ICIQ-SF. Turkish version. Turkish J Urol 2004;30:332-8
14. Haylen BT, De Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 2010;21:5-26
15. Kennelly MJ, Moore R, Nguyen JN, Lukban JC, Siegel S. Prospective evaluation of a single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 2010;184:604-9
16. Tsivian A, Kessler O, Mogutin B, Rosenthal J, Korczak D, Levin S, et al. Tape related complications of the TVT procedure. J Urol 2004;171:762-4
17. Sajadi KP, Vasavada SP. Overactive bladder after sling surgery. Curr Urol Rep 2010;11:366-71
18. Amundsen CL, Flynn BJ, Webster GD. Urethral erosion after synthetic and non synthetic pubovaginal slings: Differences in management and continence outcome. J Urol 2003; 170:134-7
19. Clemens JQ, DeLancey JO, Faerber GJ, Westney OL, Mcquire EJ. Urinary tract erosions after synthetic pubovaginal slings: Diagnosis and management strategy. Urology 2000;56:589-94
20. Kobashi KC, Govier FE. Management of vaginal erosion of polypropylene mesh slings. J Urol 2003;169:2242-3
21. Lord HE, Taylor JD, Finn JC, Tsokos N, Jeffery JT, Atherton MJ, et al. A randomized controlled equivalence trial of short-Term complications and efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape and suprapubic urethral support sling for treating stress incontinence. BJU Int 2006;98:367-76
22. Vassallo BJ, Kleeman SD, Segal J, Karram MM. Urethral erosion of a tension free vaginal tape. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101:1055-8
23. Leach GE, Dmochowski RR, Appell RA, Blaivas JG, Hadley HR, Luber KM, et al. Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. The American Urological Association. J Urol 1997;158: 875-80
24. Kayigil O, Biri A. Double forced sling by combining in situ vaginal wall and in fast pubic bone suburethral stabilization techniques: A new method. J Urol 2002;167: 2481-3
25. Shah DK, Paul EM, Amukele S, Eisenberg ER, Badlani GH. Broad based tension-free synthetic sling for stress urinary incontinence: 5-year outcome. J Urol 2003; 170:849-51