Effects of the audiovisual conflict on auditory early processes

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 115-122

  Scannella, Sébastien ^a   Causse, Mickaël ^a   Chauveau, Nicolas ^a   Pastor, Josette ^a   Dehais, Frédéric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

Audiovisual conflict; Aviation safety; Early gating; N100

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; REACTION TIME; VISUAL INFORMATION;

AUDIOVISUAL CONFLICT; AVIATION SAFETY; EARLY GATING; N100;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AVIATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SOFTWARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84880371912     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: 18727697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Besle J., Bertrand O., Giard M.H. Electrophysiological (EEG, sEEG, MEG) evidence for multiple audiovisual interactions in the human auditory cortex. Hearing Research 2009, 258(1-2):143.
2. Bliss J.P. Investigation of alarm-related accidents and incidents in aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 2003, 13(3):249-268.
3. Bliss J.P., Dunn M.C. Behavioural implications of alarm mistrust as a function of task workload. Ergonomics 2000, 43(9):1283-1300. 10.1080/001401300421743.
4. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 2001, 108(3):624-652.
5. Boutros N.N., Belger A. Midlatency evoked potentials attenuation and augmentation reflect different aspects of sensory gating. Biological Psychiatry 1999, 45(7):917-922.
6. Breznitz S. Cry Wolf: The Psychology of False Alarms 1984, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Colavita F.B., Weisberg D. A further investigation of visual dominance. Perception & Psychophysics 1979, 25(4):345-347.
8. Dehais F., Causse M., Regis N., Menant E., Labedan P., Vachon F., Tremblay S. Missing critical auditory alarms in aeronautics: evidence for inattentional deafness. Paper Presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Conference, Boston, USA 2012.
9. Di Russo F., Martínez A., Sereno M.I., Pitzalis S., Hillyard S.A. Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping 2002, 15(2):95-111.
10. Doll T.J., Folds D., Leiker L.A. Auditory information systems in military aircraft: current configurations versus the state of the art. Final Report, 1 May-30 Sep. 1983 Georgia Inst. of Tech., Atlanta. Systems Engineering Lab., 1 1984.
11. Edworthy J., Loxley S., Dennis I. Improving auditory warning design: relationship between warning sound parameters and perceived urgency. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 1991, 33(2):205-231.
12. Fedota J.R., Parasuraman R. Neuroergonomics and human error. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 2010, 11(5):402-421.
13. Feng T., Qiu Y., Zhu Y., Tong S. Attention rivalry under irrelevant audiovisual stimulation. Neuroscience Letters 2008, 438(1):6-9.
14. Fort A., Delpuech C., Pernier J., Giard M. Dynamics of cortico-subcortical cross-modal operations involved in audio-visual object detection in humans. Cerebral cortex (New York, NY: 1991) 2002, 12(10):1031.
15. Hink R.F., Van Voorhis S.T., Hillyard S.A., Smith T.S. The division of attention and the human auditory evoked potential. Neuropsychologia 1977, 15(4-5):597-605.
16. Jacoby O., Hall S., Mattingley J. A crossmodal crossover: opposite effects of visual and auditory perceptual load on steady-state evoked potentials to irrelevant visual stimuli. NeuroImage 2012, 61(4):1050.
17. Kramer A.F., Trejo L.J., Humphrey D. Assessment of mental workload with task-irrelevant auditory probes. Biological Psychology 1995, 40(1-2):83-100.
18. Lebib R., Papo D., de Bode S., Baudonniere P.M. Evidence of a visual-to-auditory cross-modal sensory gating phenomenon as reflected by the human P50 event-related brain potential modulation. Neuroscience Letters 2003, 341(3):185-188.
19. Lee Y.H., Liu B.S. Inflight workload assessment: comparison of subjective and physiological measurements. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 2003, 74(10):1078-1084.
20. Lijffijt M., Lane S.D., Meier S.L., Boutros N.N., Burroughs S., Steinberg J.L., Swann A.C. P50, N100, and P200 sensory gating: relationships with behavioral inhibition, attention, and working memory. Psychophysiology 2009, 46(5):1059-1068.
21. Macdonald J.S., Lavie N. Visual perceptual load induces inattentional deafness. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2011, 73(6):1780-1789. 10.3758/s13414-011-0144-4.
22. Molholm S., Ritter W., Murray M., Javitt D., Schroeder C., Foxe J. Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 2002, 14(1):115.
23. Moura G.S., Trinanes-Pego Y., Carrillo-de-la-Pena M.T. Effects of stimuli intensity and frequency on auditory p50 and n100 sensory gating. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 2010, 657:5-17. 10.1007/978-0-387-79100-5_1.
24. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113.
25. Orasanu J., Martin L. Errors in aviation decision making: a factor in accidents and incidents. Paper Presented at the Human Error Safety System Development (HESSD), Seattle, Washington, USA 1998.
26. Oray S., Lu Z.L., Dawson M.E. Modification of sudden onset auditory ERP by involuntary attention to visual stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2002, 43(3):213-224.
27. Parasuraman R. Event-related brain potentials and intermodal divided attention. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 1985.
28. Parasuraman R., Riley V. Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 1997, 39(2):230-253.
29. Parasuraman R., Rizzo M. Neuroergonomics. The Brain at Work 2006, vol. 195177614. Oxford University Press, USA.
30. Parks N., Hilimire M., Corballis P. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23(5):1113.
31. Peryer G., Noyes J., Pleydell-Pearce K., Lieven N. Auditory alert characteristics: a survey of pilot views. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 2005, 15(3):233-250.
32. Reale R., Calvert G., Thesen T., Jenison R., Kawasaki H., Oya H., Brugge J. Auditory-visual processing represented in the human superior temporal gyrus. Neuroscience 2007, 145(1):162-184.
33. Sarter N., Sarter M. Neuroergonomics: opportunities and challenges of merging cognitive neuroscience with cognitive ergonomics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 2003, 4(1-2):142-150.
34. Senkowski D., Molholm S., Gomez-Ramirez M., Foxe J.J. Oscillatory beta activity predicts response speed during a multisensory audiovisual reaction time task: a high-density electrical mapping study. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16(11):1556-1565.
35. Senkowski D., Saint-Amour D., Kelly S., Foxe J. Multisensory processing of naturalistic objects in motion: a high-density electrical mapping and source estimation study. NeuroImage 2007, 36(3):877.
36. Singhal A., Doerfling P., Fowler B. Effects of a dual task on the N100-P200 complex and the early and late Nd attention waveforms. Psychophysiology 2002, 39(2):236-245.
37. Sinnett S., Spence C., Soto-Faraco S. Visual dominance and attention: the Colavita effect revisited. Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69(5):673-686.
38. Song L., Kuchar J.K. Describing, predicting, and mitigating dissonance between alerting systems. Paper Presented at the 4th International Workshop on Human Error, Safety, and System Development, Linköping, Sweden 2001.
39. Sorkin R.D. Why are people turning off our alarms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1988, 84(3):1107-1108.
40. Stephan K.L., Smith S.E., Parker S.P.A., Martin R.L., McAnally K.I. Auditory warnings in the cockpit: an evaluation of potential sound types. Innovation and Consolidation in Aviation 2003, 231-241.
41. Wang Y., Wang H., Cui L., Tian S., Zhang Y. The N270 component of the event-related potential reflects supramodal conflict processing in humans. Neuroscience Letters 2002, 332(1):25-28.
42. Wheale J.L. The speed of response to synthesized voice messages. British Journal of Audiology 1981, 15(3):205-212.
43. Wickens C.D., Rice S., Keller D., Hutchins S., Hughes J., Clayton K. False alerts in air traffic control conflict alerting system: is there a "cry wolf" effect?. Human Factors 2009, 51(4):446-462.
44. Yuval-Greenberg S., Deouell L.Y. The dog's meow: asymmetrical interaction in cross-modal object recognition. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 193(4):603-614. 10.1007/s00221-008-1664-6.
45. Zouridakis G., Simos P., Papanicolaou A. Multiple bilaterally asymmetric cortical sources account for the auditory N1m component. Brain Topography 1998, 10(3):183.