Probing charged matter through h → γγ, gamma ray lines, and EDMs

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 6, 2013, Pages

  Fan, Jiji ^a   Reece, Matthew ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CP violation; Higgs Physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880357039     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2013)004     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson with a mass near 125 GeV, CMS-PAS-HIG-12-020.
2. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of an Excess of Events in the Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2012-093.
3. N. Arkani-Hamed, K. Blum, R.T. D'Agnolo and J. Fan, 2:1 for Naturalness at the LHC?, JHEP 01 (2013) 149 [ arXiv:1207.4482 ] [ INSPIRE ].
4. B. Batell, D. McKeen and M. Pospelov, Singlet Neighbors of the Higgs Boson, JHEP 10 (2012) 104 [ arXiv:1207.6252 ] [ INSPIRE ].
5. T. Bringmann, X. Huang, A. Ibarra, S. Vogl and C. Weniger, Fermi LAT Search for Internal Bremsstrahlung Signatures from Dark Matter Annihilation, JCAP 07 (2012) 054 [ arXiv:1203.1312 ] [ INSPIRE ].
6. C. Weniger, A Tentative Gamma-Ray Line from Dark Matter Annihilation at the Fermi Large Area Telescope, JCAP 08 (2012) 007 [ arXiv:1204.2797 ] [ INSPIRE ].
7. A. Rajaraman, T.M. Tait and D. Whiteson, Two Lines or Not Two Lines? That is the Question of Gamma Ray Spectra, JCAP 09 (2012) 003 [ arXiv:1205.4723 ] [ INSPIRE ].
8. M. Su and D.P. Finkbeiner, Strong Evidence for Gamma-ray Line Emission from the Inner Galaxy, arXiv:1206.1616 [ INSPIRE ].
9. M. Su and D.P. Finkbeiner, Double Gamma-ray Lines from Unassociated Fermi-LAT Sources, arXiv:1207.7060 [ INSPIRE ].
10. E. Tempel, A. Hektor and M. Raidal, Fermi 130 GeV gamma-ray excess and dark matter annihilation in sub-haloes and in the Galactic centre, JCAP 09 (2012) 032 [Addendum ibid. 1211 (2012) A01] [ arXiv:1205.1045 ] [ INSPIRE ].
11. W. Buchmüller and M. Garny, Decaying vs Annihilating Dark Matter in Light of a Tentative Gamma-Ray Line, JCAP 08 (2012) 035 [ arXiv:1206.7056 ] [ INSPIRE ].
12. T. Cohen, M. Lisanti, T.R. Slatyer and J.G. Wacker, Illuminating the 130 GeV Gamma Line with Continuum Photons, JHEP 10 (2012) 134 [ arXiv:1207.0800 ] [ INSPIRE ].
13. I. Cholis, M. Tavakoli and P. Ullio, Searching for the continuum spectrum photons correlated to the 130 GeV gamma-ray line, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 083525 [ arXiv:1207.1468 ] [ INSPIRE ].
14. J.M. Cline, 130 GeV dark matter and the Fermi gamma-ray line, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 015016 [ arXiv:1205.2688 ] [ INSPIRE ].
15. M.R. Buckley and D. Hooper, Implications of a 130 GeV Gamma-Ray Line for Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 043524 [ arXiv:1205.6811 ] [ INSPIRE ].
16. N. Weiner and I. Yavin, How Dark Are Majorana WIMPs? Signals from MiDM and Rayleigh Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075021 [ arXiv:1206.2910 ] [ INSPIRE ].
17. L. Bergstrom, The 130 GeV Fingerprint of Right-Handed Neutrino Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 103514 [ arXiv:1208.6082 ] [ INSPIRE ].
18. L. Wang and X.-F. Han, 130 GeV gamma-ray line and enhancement of h → γγ in the Higgs triplet model plus a scalar dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015015 [ arXiv:1209.0376 ] [ INSPIRE ].
19. N. Weiner and I. Yavin, UV Completions of Magnetic Inelastic Dark Matter and RayDM for the Fermi Line(s), Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 023523 [ arXiv:1209.1093 ] [ INSPIRE ].
20. S. Baek, P. Ko and E. Senaha, Can Zee-Babu model implemented with scalar dark matter explain both Fermi/LAT 130 GeV γ-ray excess and neutrino physics?, arXiv:1209.1685 [ INSPIRE ].
21. F. D'Eramo, M. McCullough and J. Thaler, Multiple Gamma Lines from Semi-Annihilation, JCAP 04 (2013) 030 [ arXiv:1210.7817 ] [ INSPIRE ].
22. Y. Farzan and A.R. Akbarieh, Natural explanation for 130 GeV photon line within vector boson dark matter model, arXiv:1211.4685 [ INSPIRE ].
23. K.-Y. Choi and O. Seto, A Dirac right-handed sneutrino dark matter and its signature in the gamma-ray lines, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 043515 [Erratum ibid. D 86 (2012) 089904] [ arXiv:1205.3276 ] [ INSPIRE ].
24. J. Kopp, E.T. Neil, R. Primulando and J. Zupan, From gamma ray line signals of dark matter to the LHC, Phys. Dark. Univ. 2 (2013) 22 [ arXiv:1301.1683 ] [ INSPIRE ].
25. H.M. Lee, M. Park and W.-I. Park, Fermi Gamma Ray Line at 130 GeV from Axion-Mediated Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 103502 [ arXiv:1205.4675 ] [ INSPIRE ].
26. D. Das, U. Ellwanger and P. Mitropoulos, A 130 GeV photon line from dark matter annihilation in the NMSSM, JCAP 08 (2012) 003 [ arXiv:1206.2639 ] [ INSPIRE ].
27. S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu and K.M. Zurek, Three Exceptions for Thermal Dark Matter with Enhanced Annihilation to γγ, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 036011 [ arXiv:1208.0009 ] [ INSPIRE ].
28. E. Dudas, Y. Mambrini, S. Pokorski and A. Romagnoni, Extra U(1) as natural source of a monochromatic gamma ray line, JHEP 10 (2012) 123 [ arXiv:1205.1520 ] [ INSPIRE ].
29. H.M. Lee, M. Park and W.-I. Park, Axion-mediated dark matter and Higgs diphoton signal, JHEP 12 (2012) 037 [ arXiv:1209.1955 ] [ INSPIRE ].
30. G. Chalons, M.J. Dolan and C. McCabe, Neutralino dark matter and the Fermi gamma-ray lines, JCAP 02 (2013) 016 [ arXiv:1211.5154 ] [ INSPIRE ].
31. K. Schmidt-Hoberg, F. Staub and M.W. Winkler, Enhanced diphoton rates at Fermi and the LHC, JHEP 01 (2013) 124 [ arXiv:1211.2835 ] [ INSPIRE ].
32. Y. Bai, M. Su and Y. Zhao, Dichromatic Dark Matter, JHEP 02 (2013) 097 [ arXiv:1212.0864 ] [ INSPIRE ].
33. J.-F. Fortin, J. Shelton, S. Thomas and Y. Zhao, Gamma Ray Spectra from Dark Matter Annihilation and Decay, arXiv:0908.2258 [ INSPIRE ].
34. A. Ibarra, S. Lopez Gehler and M. Pato, Dark matter constraints from box-shaped gamma-ray features, JCAP 07 (2012) 043 [ arXiv:1205.0007 ] [ INSPIRE ].
35. X. Chu, T. Hambye, T. Scarna and M.H. Tytgat, What if Dark Matter Gamma-Ray Lines come with Gluon Lines?, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 083521 [ arXiv:1206.2279 ] [ INSPIRE ].
36. J. Fan and M. Reece, A Simple Recipe for the 111 and 128 GeV Lines, arXiv:1209.1097 [ INSPIRE ].
37. M. Cvetič, J. Halverson and H. Piragua, Stringy Hidden Valleys, JHEP 02 (2013) 005 [ arXiv:1210.5245 ] [ INSPIRE ].
38. T. Bringmann, L. Bergstrom and J. Edsjo, New Gamma-Ray Contributions to Supersymmetric Dark Matter Annihilation, JHEP 01 (2008) 049 [ arXiv:0710.3169 ] [ INSPIRE ].
39. T. Bringmann, X. Huang, A. Ibarra, S. Vogl and C. Weniger, Fermi LAT Search for Internal Bremsstrahlung Signatures from Dark Matter Annihilation, JCAP 07 (2012) 054 [ arXiv:1203.1312 ] [ INSPIRE ].
40. B. Shakya, A 130 GeV Gamma Ray Signal from Supersymmetry, arXiv:1209.2427 [ INSPIRE ].
41. CMS collaboration, Updated measurements of the Higgs boson at 125 GeV in the two photon decay channel, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-001.
42. -1 of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-012.
43. M. Carena, I. Low and C.E. Wagner, Implications of a Modified Higgs to Diphoton Decay Width, JHEP 08 (2012) 060 [ arXiv:1206.1082 ] [ INSPIRE ].
44. A. Joglekar, P. Schwaller and C.E. Wagner, Dark Matter and Enhanced Higgs to Di-photon Rate from Vector-like Leptons, JHEP 12 (2012) 064 [ arXiv:1207.4235 ] [ INSPIRE ].
45. M. Reece, Vacuum Instabilities with a Wrong-Sign Higgs-Gluon-Gluon Amplitude, New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 043003 [ arXiv:1208.1765 ] [ INSPIRE ].
46. M. Carena, S. Gori, N.R. Shah and C.E. Wagner, A 125 GeV SM-like Higgs in the MSSM and the γγ rate, JHEP 03 (2012) 014 [ arXiv:1112.3336 ] [ INSPIRE ].
47. M. Carena, S. Gori, N.R. Shah, C.E. Wagner and L.-T. Wang, Light Stau Phenomenology and the Higgs γγ Rate, JHEP 07 (2012) 175 [ arXiv:1205.5842 ] [ INSPIRE ].
48. L.G. Almeida, E. Bertuzzo, P.A. Machado and R.Z. Funchal, Does H → γγ Taste like vanilla New Physics?, JHEP 11 (2012) 085 [ arXiv:1207.5254 ] [ INSPIRE ].
49. H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee and W.J. Marciano, Dark Side of Higgs Diphoton Decays and Muon g-2, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095009 [ arXiv:1208.2973 ] [ INSPIRE ].
50. K.J. Bae, T.H. Jung and H.D. Kim, 125 GeV Higgs as a pseudo-Goldstone boson in supersymmetry with vector-like matters, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015014 [ arXiv:1208.3748 ] [ INSPIRE ].
51. T. Kitahara, Vacuum Stability Constraints on the Enhancement of the h → γγ rate in the MSSM, JHEP 11 (2012) 021 [ arXiv:1208.4792 ] [ INSPIRE ].
52. A. Kobakhidze, Standard Model with a distorted Higgs sector and the enhanced Higgs diphoton decay rate, arXiv:1208.5180 [ INSPIRE ].
53. E.J. Chun, H.M. Lee and P. Sharma, Vacuum Stability, Perturbativity, EWPD and Higgs-to-diphoton rate in Type II Seesaw Models, JHEP 11 (2012) 106 [ arXiv:1209.1303 ] [ INSPIRE ].
54. I. Gogoladze, B. He and Q. Shafi, Inverse Seesaw in NMSSM and 126 GeV Higgs Boson, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2013) 1008 [ arXiv:1209.5984 ] [ INSPIRE ].
55. G. Moreau, Constraining extra-fermion(s) from the Higgs boson data, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015027 [ arXiv:1210.3977 ] [ INSPIRE ].
56. M. Chala, h → γγ excess and Dark Matter from Composite Higgs Models, JHEP 01 (2013) 122 [ arXiv:1210.6208 ] [ INSPIRE ].
57. K. Choi, S.H. Im, K.S. Jeong and M. Yamaguchi, Higgs mixing and diphoton rate enhancement in NMSSM models, JHEP 02 (2013) 090 [ arXiv:1211.0875 ] [ INSPIRE ].
58. B. Batell, S. Jung and H.M. Lee, Singlet Assisted Vacuum Stability and the Higgs to Diphoton Rate, JHEP 01 (2013) 135 [ arXiv:1211.2449 ] [ INSPIRE ].
59. H. Davoudiasl, I. Lewis and E. Ponton, Electroweak Phase Transition, Higgs Diphoton Rate and New Heavy Fermions, arXiv:1211.3449 [ INSPIRE ].
60. M. Carena, S. Gori, I. Low, N. Shah and C. Wagner, Vacuum Stability and Higgs Diphoton Decays in the MSSM, JHEP 02 (2013) 114 [ arXiv:1211.6136 ] [ INSPIRE ].
61. R. Huo, G. Lee, A.M. Thalapillil and C.E. Wagner, SU(2) SU(2) Gauge Extensions of the MSSM Revisited, arXiv:1212.0560 [ INSPIRE ].
62. W.-C. Huang and A. Urbano, What the top asymmetries tell us about single top production and Higgs decays, JHEP 03 (2013) 079 [ arXiv:1212.1399 ] [ INSPIRE ].
63. M. Berg, I. Buchberger, D. Ghilencea and C. Petersson, Higgs diphoton rate enhancement from supersymmetric physics beyond the MSSM, arXiv:1212.5009 [ INSPIRE ].
64. PQ -Extended MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075030 [ arXiv:1207.2473 ] [ INSPIRE ].
65. A. Azatov and J. Galloway, Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and the Higgs Boson: Confronting Theories at Colliders, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28 (2013) 1330004 [ arXiv:1212.1380 ] [ INSPIRE ].
66. M. Voloshin, CP Violation in Higgs Diphoton Decay in Models with Vectorlike Heavy Fermions, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 093016 [ arXiv:1208.4303 ] [ INSPIRE ].
67. D. McKeen, M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Modified Higgs branching ratios versus CP and lepton flavor violation, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 113004 [ arXiv:1208.4597 ] [ INSPIRE ].
68. A.C. Vutha et al., Search for the electric dipole moment of the electron with thorium monoxide, J. Phys. B 43 (2010) 074007 [ arXiv:0908.2412 ] [ INSPIRE ].
69. Muon G-2 collaboration, G. Bennett et al., Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 072003 [ hep-ex/0602035 ] [ INSPIRE ].
70. μ and \alpha \left({M-Z2} \right) re-evaluated using new precise data, J. Phys. G 38 (2011) 085003 [ arXiv:1105.3149 ] [ INSPIRE ].
71. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the Hadronic Contributions to the Muon g - 2 and to α(M Z), Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1515 [Erratum ibid. C 72 (2012) 1874] [ arXiv:1010.4180 ] [ INSPIRE ].
72. G.F. Giudice, P. Paradisi, A. Strumia and A. Strumia, Correlation between the Higgs Decay Rate to Two Photons and the Muon g - 2, JHEP 10 (2012) 186 [ arXiv:1207.6393 ] [ INSPIRE ].
73. C. Burgess, M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, The minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: A Singlet scalar, Nucl. Phys. B 619 (2001) 709 [ hep-ph/0011335 ] [ INSPIRE ].
74. J.R. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard and D.V. Nanopoulos, A Phenomenological Profile of the Higgs Boson, Nucl. Phys. B 106 (1976) 292 [ INSPIRE ].
75. M.A. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, M. Voloshin and V.I. Zakharov, Low-Energy Theorems for Higgs Boson Couplings to Photons, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 30 (1979) 711 [ INSPIRE ].
76. D. Hooper, C. Kelso and F.S. Queiroz, Stringent and Robust Constraints on the Dark Matter Annihilation Cross section From the Region of the Galactic Center, arXiv:1209.3015 [ INSPIRE ].
77. R. Laha, K.C.Y. Ng, B. Dasgupta and S. Horiuchi, Galactic Center Radio Constraints on Gamma-Ray Lines from Dark Matter Annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 043516 [ arXiv:1208.5488 ] [ INSPIRE ].
78. J. Giedt, A.W. Thomas and R.D. Young, Dark matter, the CMSSM and lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 201802 [ arXiv:0907.4177 ] [ INSPIRE ].
79. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark Matter Results from 225 Live Days of XENON100 Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 181301 [ arXiv:1207.5988 ] [ INSPIRE ].
80. J.F. Gunion, H.E. Haber, G.L. Kane and S. Dawson, The Higgs Hunter's Guide, Front. Phys. 80 (2000) 1 [ INSPIRE ].
81. K. Griest and D. Seckel, Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 3191 [ INSPIRE ].
82. M. Gonderinger, H. Lim and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Complex Scalar Singlet Dark Matter: Vacuum Stability and Phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 043511 [ arXiv:1202.1316 ] [ INSPIRE ].
83. C. Cheung, M. Papucci and K.M. Zurek, Higgs and Dark Matter Hints of an Oasis in the Desert, JHEP 07 (2012) 105 [ arXiv:1203.5106 ] [ INSPIRE ].
84. L. Bergstrom and P. Ullio, Full one loop calculation of neutralino annihilation into two photons, Nucl. Phys. B 504 (1997) 27 [ hep-ph/9706232 ] [ INSPIRE ].
85. Z. Bern, P. Gondolo and M. Perelstein, Neutralino annihilation into two photons, Phys. Lett. B 411 (1997) 86 [ hep-ph/9706538 ] [ INSPIRE ].
86. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two Loop Renormalization Group Equations in a General Quantum Field Theory. 1. Wave Function Renormalization, Nucl. Phys. B 222 (1983)83 [ INSPIRE ].
87. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two Loop Renormalization Group Equations in a General Quantum Field Theory. 2. Yukawa Couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 236 (1984) 221 [ INSPIRE ].
88. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two Loop Renormalization Group Equations in a General Quantum Field Theory. 3. Scalar Quartic Couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 249 (1985) 70 [ INSPIRE ].
89. M.-x. Luo, H.-w. Wang and Y. Xiao, Two loop renormalization group equations in general gauge field theories, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 065019 [ hep-ph/0211440 ] [ INSPIRE ].
90. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rept. 459 (2008) 1 [ hep-ph/0503173 ] [ INSPIRE ].
91. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Giudice and A. Romanino, Aspects of split supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 709 (2005) 3 [ hep-ph/0409232 ] [ INSPIRE ].
92. J. Fan, M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, Non-relativistic effective theory of dark matter direct detection, JCAP 11 (2010) 042 [ arXiv:1008.1591 ] [ INSPIRE ].
93. S.M. Barr and A. Zee, Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron and of the Neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 21 [Erratum ibid. 65 (1990) 2920] [ INSPIRE ].
94. S. Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566 [ INSPIRE ].
95. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [ INSPIRE ].
96. G. Giudice and A. Romanino, Electric dipole moments in split supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 634 (2006) 307 [ hep-ph/0510197 ] [ INSPIRE ].
97. S. Jung and J.D. Wells, Comparison of electric dipole moments and the Large Hadron Collider for probing CP-violation in triple boson vertices, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 015009 [ arXiv:0811.4140 ] [ INSPIRE ].
98. -, Nucl. Phys. B 282 (1987) 253 [ INSPIRE ].
99. L3 collaboration, P. Achard et al., Measurement of the cross section of W-boson pair production at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 600 (2004) 22 [ hep-ex/0409016 ] [ INSPIRE ].
100. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the sum of WW and WZ production with W+dijet events in pp collisions at s=7 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2283 [ arXiv:1210.7544 ] [ INSPIRE ].
101. - production in pp collisions at s=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector and limits on anomalous WWZ and WWγ couplings, arXiv:1210.2979 [ INSPIRE ].
102. - at LEP 2, Eur. Phys. J. C 54 (2008) 345 [ arXiv:0801.1235 ] [ INSPIRE ].
103. D0 collaboration, S. Abachi et al., Limits on anomalous WWγ couplings from p\overline{p} →Wγ+X events at \sqrt{s}=1.8 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 3634 [ hep-ex/9612002 ] [ INSPIRE ].
104. J. Hudson et al., Improved measurement of the shape of the electron, Nature 473 (2011) 493 [ INSPIRE ].
105. D. Kara et al., Measurement of the electron's electric dipole moment using YbF molecules: methods and data analysis, New J. Phys. 14 (2012) 103051 [ arXiv:1208.4507 ] [ INSPIRE ].
106. C. Baker et al., An improved experimental limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 131801 [ hep-ex/0602020 ] [ INSPIRE ].
107. W. Griffith et al., Improved Limit on the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of Hg-199, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 101601 [ INSPIRE ].
108. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of Particle Physics (RPP), Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001 [ INSPIRE ].
109. Z. Han, Effective Theories and Electroweak Precision Constraints, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 23 (2008) 2653 [ arXiv:0807.0490 ] [ INSPIRE ].
110. Y. Li, S. Profumo and M. Ramsey-Musolf, Higgs-Higgsino-Gaugino Induced Two Loop Electric Dipole Moments, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 075009 [ arXiv:0806.2693 ] [ INSPIRE ].
111. D. Chang, W.-Y. Keung and A. Pilaftsis, New two loop contribution to electric dipole moment in supersymmetric theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 900 [Erratum ibid. 83 (1999) 3972] [ hep-ph/9811202 ] [ INSPIRE ].