What the top asymmetries tell us about single top production and Higgs decays

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Huang, Wei Chih ^a,b   Urbano, Alfredo ^a  

^a SISSA   (Italy)

^b SEZIONE DI TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Phenomenological Models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876269090     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2013)079     Document Type: Article

References (138)

1. ATLAS collaboration, F. Gianotti, Latest results from ATLAS Higgs search, talk given at CERN, Geneva Switzerland July 4 2012.
2. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [ arXiv:1207.7214 ] [ INSPIRE ].
3. CMS collaboration, J. Incandela, Observation of a new particle with a mass of 125 GeV, talk given at CERN, Geneva Switzerland July 4 2012.
4. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [ arXiv:1207.7235 ] [ INSPIRE ].
5. F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 321 [ INSPIRE ].
6. P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 508 [ INSPIRE ].
7. P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields, Phys. Lett. 12 (1964) 132 [ INSPIRE ].
8. D0 collaboration, S. Abachi et al., Observation of the top quark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 2632 [ hep-ex/9503003 ] [ INSPIRE ].
9. CDF collaboration, F. Abe et al., Observation of top quark production in \overline{p}p collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 2626 [ hep-ex/9503002 ] [ INSPIRE ].
10. Particle Data Group collaboration, C. Amsler et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Lett. B 667 (2008) 1 [ INSPIRE ].
11. ATLAS collaboration, M. Jimenez, Search for the Higgs boson in the di-photon decay channel with ATLAS detect, talks given at HCP2012, Kyoto Japan November 14 2012.
12. CMS collaboration, N. Marinelli, Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson decaying in two photons, talks given at HCP2012, Kyoto Japan November 14 2012.
13. A. Djouadi, Squark effects on Higgs boson production and decay at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 435 (1998)101 [ hep-ph/9806315 ] [ INSPIRE ].
14. A. Akeroyd and S. Moretti, Enhancement of H → γγ from doubly charged scalars in the Higgs triplet model, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 035015 [ arXiv:1206.0535 ] [ INSPIRE ].
15. L. Wang and X.-F. Han, 130 GeV gamma-ray line and enhancement of h → γγ in the Higgs triplet model plus a scalar dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015015 [ arXiv:1209.0376 ] [ INSPIRE ].
16. M. Carena, S. Gori, I. Low, N.R. Shah and C.E. Wagner, Vacuum stability and Higgs diphoton decays in the MSSM, JHEP 02 (2013) 114 [ arXiv:1211.6136 ] [ INSPIRE ].
17. E.J. Chun, H.M. Lee and P. Sharma, Vacuum stability, perturbativity, EWPD and Higgs-to-diphoton rate in type II seesaw models, JHEP 11 (2012) 106 [ arXiv:1209.1303 ] [ INSPIRE ].
18. R. Sato, K. Tobioka and N. Yokozaki, Enhanced diphoton signal of the Higgs boson and the muon g-2 in gauge mediation models, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 441 [ arXiv:1208.2630 ] [ INSPIRE ].
19. A. Joglekar, P. Schwaller and C.E. Wagner, Dark matter and enhanced Higgs to di-photon rate from vector-like leptons, JHEP 12 (2012) 064 [ arXiv:1207.4235 ] [ INSPIRE ].
20. E. Bertuzzo, P.A. Machado and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Can new colored particles illuminate the Higgs?, JHEP 02 (2013) 086 [ arXiv:1209.6359 ] [ INSPIRE ].
21. L.G. Almeida, E. Bertuzzo, P.A. Machado and R.Z. Funchal, Does H → γγ taste like vanilla new physics?, JHEP 11 (2012) 085 [ arXiv:1207.5254 ] [ INSPIRE ].
22. H. Davoudiasl, I. Lewis and E. Ponton, Electroweak phase transition, Higgs diphoton rate and new heavy fermions, arXiv:1211.3449 [ INSPIRE ].
23. B. Batell, S. Jung and H.M. Lee, Singlet assisted vacuum stability and the Higgs to diphoton rate, JHEP 01 (2013) 135 [ arXiv:1211.2449 ] [ INSPIRE ].
24. H.M. Lee, M. Park and W.-I. Park, Axion-mediated dark matter and Higgs diphoton signal, JHEP 12 (2012) 037 [ arXiv:1209.1955 ] [ INSPIRE ].
25. M. Voloshin, CP violation in Higgs diphoton decay in models with vectorlike heavy fermions, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 093016 [ arXiv:1208.4303 ] [ INSPIRE ].
26. A. Alves et al., Probing 3-3-1 models in diphoton Higgs boson decay, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011)115004 [ arXiv:1109.0238 ] [ INSPIRE ].
27. A. Urbano, Higgs decay into photons through a spin-2 loop, arXiv:1208.5782 [ INSPIRE ].
28. CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Evidence for a mass dependent forward-backward asymmetry in top quark pair production, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 112003 [ arXiv:1101.0034 ] [ INSPIRE ].
29. CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Study of the top quark production asymmetry and its mass and rapidity dependence in the full run II Tevatron dataset, CDF note 10807, Fermilab, Batavia U.S.A. (2012).
30. D0 collaboration, V.M. Abazov et al., Forward-backward asymmetry in top quark-antiquark production, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 112005 [ arXiv:1107.4995 ] [ INSPIRE ].
31. L. Sehgal and M. Wanninger, Forward-backward asymmetry in two jet events: signature of axigluons in proton-anti-proton collisions, Phys. Lett. B 200 (1988) 211 [ INSPIRE ].
32. P.H. Frampton, J. Shu and K. Wang, Axigluon as possible explanation for p\overline{p} → t\overline{t} forward-backward asymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 683 (2010) 294 [ arXiv:0911.2955 ] [ INSPIRE ].
33. R.S. Chivukula, E.H. Simmons and C.-P. Yuan, Axigluons cannot explain the observed top quark forward-backward asymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 094009 [ arXiv:1007.0260 ] [ INSPIRE ].
34. A.R. Zerwekh, The axigluon, a four-site model and the top quark forward-backward asymmetry at the Tevatron, Phys. Lett. B 704 (2011) 62 [ arXiv:1103.0956 ] [ INSPIRE ].
35. O. Antunano, J.H. Kuhn and G. Rodrigo, Top quarks, axigluons and charge asymmetries at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 014003 [ arXiv:0709.1652 ] [ INSPIRE ].
36. FB, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 114027 [ arXiv:1103.3501 ] [ INSPIRE ].
37. J. Shu, K. Wang and G. Zhu, A revisit to top quark forward-backward asymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 034008 [ arXiv:1104.0083 ] [ INSPIRE ].
38. J. Aguilar-Saavedra and M. Pérez-Victoria, No like-sign tops at Tevatron: constraints on extended models and implications for the t\overline{t} asymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011) 93 [ arXiv:1104.1385 ] [ INSPIRE ].
39. jj excess at CDF, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 094007 [ arXiv:1104.2030 ] [ INSPIRE ].
40. jj excess at CDF, Phys. Lett. B 703 (2011) 142 [ arXiv:1104.3227 ] [ INSPIRE ].
41. jj excess at CDF from gauged flavor symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 061802 [ arXiv:1104.4782 ] [ INSPIRE ].
42. Y. Cui, Z. Han and M.D. Schwartz, Top condensation as a motivated explanation of the top forward-backward asymmetry, JHEP 07 (2011) 127 [ arXiv:1106.3086 ] [ INSPIRE ].
43. J. Aguilar-Saavedra and M. Pérez-Victoria, Simple models for the top asymmetry: constraints and predictions, JHEP 09 (2011) 097 [ arXiv:1107.0841 ] [ INSPIRE ].
44. s decay, the top forward-backward asymmetry and the CDF dijet excess, JHEP 10 (2011) 003 [ arXiv:1107.2933 ] [ INSPIRE ].
45. J. Shu, T.M. Tait and K. Wang, Explorations of the top quark forward-backward asymmetry at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 034012 [ arXiv:0911.3237 ] [ INSPIRE ].
46. B. Grinstein, A.L. Kagan, M. Trott and J. Zupan, Forward-backward asymmetry in t\overline{t} production from flavour symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 012002 [ arXiv:1102.3374 ] [ INSPIRE ].
47. K.M. Patel and P. Sharma, Forward-backward asymmetry in top quark production from light colored scalars in SO(10) model, JHEP 04 (2011) 085 [ arXiv:1102.4736 ] [ INSPIRE ].
48. Z. Ligeti, G. Marques Tavares and M. Schmaltz, Explaining the t\overline{t} forward-backward asymmetry without dijet or flavor anomalies, JHEP 06 (2011) 109 [ arXiv:1103.2757 ] [ INSPIRE ].
49. J. Aguilar-Saavedra and M. Pérez-Victoria, Probing the Tevatron t\overline{t} asymmetry at LHC, JHEP 05 (2011) 034 [ arXiv:1103.2765 ] [ INSPIRE ].
50. L. Wang, L. Wu and J.M. Yang, Top quark forward-backward asymmetry and charge asymmetry in left-right twin Higgs model, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075017 [ arXiv:1111.4771 ] [ INSPIRE ].
51. ′ bosons, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 094027 [ arXiv:1203.4489 ] [ INSPIRE ].
52. ′ to conciliate the apparent disagreement between top-antitop Tevatron forward-backward asymmetry and LHC charge asymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 114034 [ arXiv:1209.4354 ] [ INSPIRE ].
53. ′ models at linear colliders, arXiv:1108.2908 [ INSPIRE ].
54. ′ couplings, Phys. Rev. D 84(2011)054018[ arXiv:1106.5982 ][ INSPIRE ].
55. ′ model at O\left({\alpha-s 2{\alpha-X}} \right) Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 034026 [ arXiv:1006.2510 ] [ INSPIRE ].
56. ′ -boson with general couplings, JHEP 10 (2012) 103 [ arXiv:1205.3311 ] [ INSPIRE ].
57. K. Blum, Y. Hochberg and Y. Nir, Scalar-mediated t\overline{t} forward-backward asymmetry, JHEP 10 (2011)124 [ arXiv:1107.4350 ] [ INSPIRE ].
58. N. Cabibbo, Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10 (1963) 531 [ INSPIRE ].
59. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, CP violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49 (1973) 652 [ INSPIRE ].
60. J.H. Kuhn and G. Rodrigo, Charge asymmetry in hadroproduction of heavy quarks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 49 [ hep-ph/9802268 ] [ INSPIRE ].
61. J.H. Kuhn and G. Rodrigo, Charge asymmetry of heavy quarks at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 054017 [ hep-ph/9807420 ] [ INSPIRE ].
62. J.H. Kuhn and G. Rodrigo, Charge asymmetries of top quarks at hadron colliders revisited, JHEP 01 (2012) 063 [ arXiv:1109.6830 ] [ INSPIRE ].
63. W. Hollik and D. Pagani, The electroweak contribution to the top quark forward-backward asymmetry at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 093003 [ arXiv:1107.2606 ] [ INSPIRE ].
64. W. Bernreuther and Z.-G. Si, Top quark and leptonic charge asymmetries for the Tevatron and LHC, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 034026 [ arXiv:1205.6580 ] [ INSPIRE ].
65. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: going beyond, JHEP 06 (2011) 128 [ arXiv:1106.0522 ] [ INSPIRE ].
66. Generate processes online using MadGraph 5 webpage, http://madgraph.hep. uiuc.edu/.
67. S. Kretzer, H. Lai, F. Olness and W. Tung, CTEQ6 parton distributions with heavy quark mass effects, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 114005 [ hep-ph/0307022 ] [ INSPIRE ].
68. P.M. Nadolsky et al., Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 013004 [ arXiv:0802.0007 ] [ INSPIRE ].
69. CTEQ6 parton distribution functions webpage, http://hep.pa.msu.edu/cteq/ public/cteq6.html.
70. A. Martin, W. Stirling, R. Thorne and G. Watt, Parton distributions for the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 63 (2009) 189 [ arXiv:0901.0002 ] [ INSPIRE ].
71. J. Shu, T.M. Tait and K. Wang, Explorations of the top quark forward-backward asymmetry at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 034012 [ arXiv:0911.3237 ] [ INSPIRE ].
72. J. Campbell, K. Ellis and C. Williams, MCFM - Monte Carlo for FeMtobarn processes webpage, http://mcfm.fnal.gov/.
73. -1, conf. note 9913, Fermilab, Batavia U.S.A. (2009).
74. ′ bosons, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 094027 [ arXiv:1203.4489 ] [ INSPIRE ].
75. M. Jezabek and J.H. Kuhn, QCD corrections to semileptonic decays of heavy quarks, Nucl. Phys. B 314 (1989) 1 [ INSPIRE ].
76. D0 collaboration, V.M. Abazov et al., Determination of the width of the top quark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 022001 [ arXiv:1009.5686 ] [ INSPIRE ].
77. FB versus LHC top physics, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 014022 [ arXiv:1107.4364 ] [ INSPIRE ].
78. FB, arXiv:1209.4899 [ INSPIRE ].
79. ATLAS collaboration, R. Calkins, Top quark production measurements at ATLAS, AIP Conf. Proc. 1441 (2012) 738 [ arXiv:1110.1027 ] [ INSPIRE ].
80. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the t\overline{t} production cross section and the top quark mass in the dilepton channel in pp collisions at = 7 TeV, JHEP 07 (2011) 049 [ arXiv:1105.5661 ] [ INSPIRE ].
81. U. Langenfeld, S. Moch and P. Uwer, Measuring the running top-quark mass, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009)054009 [ arXiv:0906.5273 ] [ INSPIRE ].
82. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the charge asymmetry in dileptonic decay of top quark pairs in pp collisions at = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2012-057, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2012).
83. CMS collaboration, Inclusive and differential measurements of the t\overline{t} charge asymmetry in proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 717 (2012) 129 [ arXiv:1207.0065 ] [ INSPIRE ].
84. A. Belyaev, N.D. Christensen and A. Pukhov, CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model, arXiv:1207.6082 [ INSPIRE ].
85. CalcHEP - a package for calculation of Feynman diagrams and integration over multi-particle phase space webpage, http://theory.sinp.msu.ru/pukhov/ calchep.html.
86. ATLAS collaboration, Search for W + t single-top events in the dileptonic channel at ATLAS, ATLAS-CONF-2011-104, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2011).
87. ATLAS collaboration, Searches for single top-quark production with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at = 7 TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2011-027, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2011).
88. CMS collaboration, Search for single top tW associated production in the dilepton decay channel in pp collisions at = 7 TeV, CMS-PAS-TOP-11-022, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2011).
89. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, JHEP 05 (2006)026 [ hep-ph/0603175 ] [ INSPIRE ].
90. PYTHIA 6.4 webpage, http://pythia6.hepforge.org/.
91. PGS 4 - Pretty Good Simulation of high energy collisions webpage, http://www.physics.ucdavis.edu/conway/research/software/pgs/pgs4-general.htm.
92. M.L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini and M. Treccani, Matching matrix elements and shower evolution for top-quark production in hadronic collisions, JHEP 01 (2007) 013 [ hep-ph/0611129 ] [ INSPIRE ].
93. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the t-channel single top quark production cross section in pp collisions at = 7 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 091802 [ arXiv:1106.3052 ] [ INSPIRE ].
94. FB with parity violation constraints, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 034029 [ arXiv:1203.1320 ] [ INSPIRE ].
95. J.R. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard and D.V. Nanopoulos, A phenomenological profile of the Higgs boson, Nucl. Phys. B 106 (1976) 292 [ INSPIRE ].
96. B.A. Kniehl, Higgs phenomenology at one loop in the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 240 (1994)211 [ INSPIRE ].
97. A. Djouadi, V. Driesen, W. Hollik and A. Kraft, The Higgs-photon-Z-boson coupling revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 1 (1998) 163 [ hep-ph/9701342 ] [ INSPIRE ].
98. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: the Higgs boson in the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 457 (2008) 1 [ hep-ph/0503172 ] [ INSPIRE ].
99. M. Carena, I. Low and C.E. Wagner, Implications of a modified Higgs to diphoton decay width, JHEP 08 (2012) 060 [ arXiv:1206.1082 ] [ INSPIRE ].
100. I. Low, J. Lykken and G. Shaughnessy, Have we observed the Higgs (imposter)?, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 093012 [ arXiv:1207.1093 ] [ INSPIRE ].
101. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Is the resonance at 125 GeV the Higgs boson?, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2012) 469 [ arXiv:1207.1347 ] [ INSPIRE ].
102. M. Montull and F. Riva, Higgs discovery: the beginning or the end of natural EWSB?, JHEP 11 (2012) 018 [ arXiv:1207.1716 ] [ INSPIRE ].
103. J. Ellis and T. You, Global analysis of the Higgs candidate with mass ∼ 125 GeV, JHEP 09 (2012)123 [ arXiv:1207.1693 ] [ INSPIRE ].
104. D. Carmi, A. Falkowski, E. Kuflik, T. Volansky and J. Zupan, Higgs after the discovery: a status report, JHEP 10 (2012) 196 [ arXiv:1207.1718 ] [ INSPIRE ].
105. J. Espinosa, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Trott, First glimpses at Higgs' face, JHEP 12 (2012)045 [ arXiv:1207.1717 ] [ INSPIRE ].
106. -1 of pp collision data at = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 49 [ arXiv:1202.1408 ] [ INSPIRE ].
107. CMS collaboration, Combined results of searches for the Standard Model Higgs boson in pp collisions at = 7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 26 [ arXiv:1202.1488 ] [ INSPIRE ].
108. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Reconstructing Higgs boson properties from the LHC and Tevatron data, JHEP 06 (2012) 117 [ arXiv:1203.4254 ] [ INSPIRE ].
109. D. Carmi, A. Falkowski, E. Kuflik and T. Volansky, Interpreting LHC Higgs results from natural new physics perspective, JHEP 07 (2012) 136 [ arXiv:1202.3144 ] [ INSPIRE ].
110. A. Azatov, R. Contino and J. Galloway, Model-independent bounds on a light Higgs, JHEP 04 (2012) 127 [ arXiv:1202.3415 ] [ INSPIRE ].
111. J. Espinosa, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Trott, Fingerprinting Higgs suspects at the LHC, JHEP 05 (2012) 097 [ arXiv:1202.3697 ] [ INSPIRE ].
112. J. Ellis and T. You, Global analysis of experimental constraints on a possible Higgs-like particle with mass ∼ 125 GeV, JHEP 06 (2012) 140 [ arXiv:1204.0464 ] [ INSPIRE ].
113. J. Baglio, A. Djouadi and R. Godbole, The apparent excess in the Higgs to di-photon rate at the LHC: new physics or QCD uncertainties?, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 203 [ arXiv:1207.1451 ] [ INSPIRE ].
114. F.J. Petriello, Kaluza-Klein effects on Higgs physics in universal extra dimensions, JHEP 05 (2002) 003 [ hep-ph/0204067 ] [ INSPIRE ].
115. T. Han, H.E. Logan, B. McElrath and L.-T. Wang, Loop induced decays of the little Higgs: H →gg, γγ, Phys. Lett. B 563(2003)191[Erratum ibid. B 603(2004)257] [ hep-ph/0302188 ] [ INSPIRE ].
116. C.-R. Chen, K. Tobe and C.-P. Yuan, Higgs boson production and decay in little Higgs models with T-parity, Phys. Lett. B 640 (2006) 263 [ hep-ph/0602211 ] [ INSPIRE ].
117. G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea and J. Llodra-Perez, Higgs → γγ beyond the Standard Model, JHEP 06 (2009) 054 [ arXiv:0901.0927 ] [ INSPIRE ].
118. J. Cao, Z. Heng, T. Liu and J.M. Yang, Di-photon Higgs signal at the LHC: a comparative study for different supersymmetric models, Phys. Lett. B 703 (2011) 462 [ arXiv:1103.0631 ] [ INSPIRE ].
119. N. Arkani-Hamed, K. Blum, R.T. D'Agnolo and J. Fan, 2: 1 for naturalness at the LHC?, JHEP 01 (2013) 149 [ arXiv:1207.4482 ] [ INSPIRE ].
120. K. Choi, S.H. Im, K.S. Jeong and M. Yamaguchi, Higgs mixing and diphoton rate enhancement in NMSSM models, JHEP 02 (2013) 090 [ arXiv:1211.0875 ] [ INSPIRE ].
121. T. Kitahara, Vacuum stability constraints on the enhancement of the h → γγ rate in the MSSM, JHEP 11 (2012) 021 [ arXiv:1208.4792 ] [ INSPIRE ].
122. M. Hashimoto and V. Miransky, Enhanced diphoton Higgs decay rate and isospin symmetric Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095018 [ arXiv:1208.1305 ] [ INSPIRE ].
123. A. Delgado, G. Nardini and M. Quirós, Large diphoton Higgs rates from supersymmetric triplets, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 115010 [ arXiv:1207.6596 ] [ INSPIRE ].
124. PQ -extended MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075030 [ arXiv:1207.2473 ] [ INSPIRE ].
125. M. Chala, h → γγ excess and dark matter from composite Higgs models, JHEP 01 (2013) 122 [ arXiv:1210.6208 ] [ INSPIRE ].
126. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rept. 459 (2008) 1 [ hep-ph/0503173 ] [ INSPIRE ].
127. T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, Infrared singularities and massive fields, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975)2856 [ INSPIRE ].
128. GFitter - constraints on the oblique parameters and related theories webpage, http://project-gfitter.web.cern.ch/project-gfitter/Oblique Parameters/.
129. L.-F. Li, Oblique electroweak corrections from heavy scalar fields, Z. Phys. C 58 (1993) 519 [ INSPIRE ].
130. H.-H. Zhang, W.-B. Yan and X.-S. Li, The oblique corrections from heavy scalars in irreducible representations, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23 (2008) 637 [ hep-ph/0612059 ] [ INSPIRE ].
131. L. Wang and X.-F. Han, LHC diphoton Higgs signal and top quark forward-backward asymmetry in quasi-inert Higgs doublet model, JHEP 05 (2012) 088 [ arXiv:1203.4477 ] [ INSPIRE ].
132. LEPSUSYWG, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3 and OPAL experiments collaboration, Combined LEP selectron/smuon/stau results, 183-208 GeV, note LEPSUSYWG/04-01.1, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2004).
133. N.G. Deshpande and E. Ma, Pattern of symmetry breaking with two Higgs doublets, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 2574 [ INSPIRE ].
134. A. Arhrib, R. Benbrik and N. Gaur, H → γγ in inert Higgs doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012)095021 [ arXiv:1201.2644 ] [ INSPIRE ].
135. B.W. Lee, C. Quigg and H. Thacker, Weak interactions at very high-energies: the role of the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1519 [ INSPIRE ].
136. R. Casalbuoni, D. Dominici, R. Gatto and C. Giunti, Strong interacting two doublet and doublet singlet Higgs models, Phys. Lett. B 178 (1986) 235 [ INSPIRE ].
137. R. Casalbuoni, D. Dominici, F. Feruglio and R. Gatto, Tree level unitarity violation for large scalar mass in multi-Higgs extensions of the Standard Model, Nucl. Phys. B 299 (1988)117 [ INSPIRE ].
138. Q.-H. Cao et al., W plus two jets from a quasi-inert Higgs doublet, JHEP 08 (2011) 002 [ arXiv:1104.4776 ] [ INSPIRE ].