Summary report of the first international workshop on PET/MR imaging, March 19-23, 2012, Tübingen, Germany

Molecular Imaging and Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 361-371

  Bailey, Dale L ^a   Barthel, Henryk ^b   Beyer, Thomas ^c   Boellaard, Ronald ^d   Gückel, Brigitte ^e   Hellwig, Dirk ^f   Herzog, Hans ^g   Pichler, Bernd J ^e   Quick, Harald H ^h   Sabri, Osama ^b   Scheffler, Klaus ^e,i   Schlemmer, Heinz P ^j   Schwenzer, Nina F ^e   Wehrl, Hans F ^e  

^a ROYAL NORTH SHORE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c Christian Doppler Laboratory for Innovative Optical Imaging and its Translation to Medicine   (Austria)

^d VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^f SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^g FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

ⁱ MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^j GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

Artifacts; Combined imaging; Molecular imaging; MR based attenuation correction; PET CT; PET MRI; Quantification; Standardization; Workflow

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE COURSE; GERMANY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REVIEW; SIGNAL DETECTION; SOLID TUMOR; STANDARDIZATION; TREATMENT RESPONSE; WORKSHOP;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; GERMANY; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; REFERENCE STANDARDS; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84880333573     PISSN: 15361632     EISSN: 18602002     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-013-0623-1     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Pichler BJ, Kolb A, Nägele T et al (2010) PET/MRI: paving the way for the next generation of clinical multimodality imaging applications. J Nucl Med 51(3):333-6
2. Beyer T, Freudenberg LS, Czernin J et al (2011) The future of hybrid imaging-part 3: PET/MR, small-animal imaging and beyond. Insights Imaging 2(3):235-246
3. Martinez-Möller A, Souvatzoglou M, Delso G et al (2009) Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data. J Nucl Med 50(4):520-6
4. Zenge MO, Vogt FM, Brauck K et al (2006) High-resolution continuously acquired peripheral MR angiography featuring partial parallel imaging GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med 56(4):859-65
5. Delso G, Fürst S, Jakoby B et al (2011) Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner. J Nucl Med 52(12):1914-22
6. Schulz V, Torres-Espallardo I, Renisch S et al (2011) Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38(1):138-52
7. Shao Y, Cherry SR, Farahani K et al (1997) Simultaneous PET and MR imaging. Phys Med Biol 42(10):1965-70
8. Slates RB, Farahani K, Shao Y et al (1999) A study of artefacts in simultaneous PET and MR imaging using a prototype MR compatible PET scanner. Phys Med Biol 44(8):2015-27
9. Marsden PK, Strul D, Keevil SF et al (2002) Simultaneous PET and NMR. Br J Radiol 75(Spec No):S53-9
10. Wehrl HF, Judenhofer MS, Wiehr S et al (2009) Pre-clinical PET/MR: technological advances and new perspectives in biomedical research. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36(Suppl 1):56-68
11. Pichler B, Lorenz E, Mirzoyan R et al. (1997) Performance test of a LSO-APD PET module in a 9.4 tesla magnet. Nuclear Science Symposium, 1997. IEEE Date of Conference: 9-15 Nov 1997, Volume: 2 Page(s): 1237-1239
12. Boone JM, Velazquez O, Cherry SR (2004) Small-animal X-ray dose from micro-CT. Mol Imaging 3(3):149-58
13. Badea CT, Drangova M, Holdsworth DW et al (2008) In vivo small animal imaging using micro-CT and digital subtraction angiography. Phys Med Biol 53(19):319-350
14. Funk T, Sun M, Hasegawa BH (2004) Radiation dose estimate in small animal SPECT and PET. Med Phys 31(9):2680-6
15. Hofmann M, Pichler B, Schölkopf B et al (2009) Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36(Suppl 1):S93-104
16. Defrise M, Rezaei A, Nuyts J (2012) Time-of-flight PET data determine the attenuation sinogram up to a constant. Phys Med Biol 57(4):885-99
17. Therasse P, Eisenhauer EA, Verweij J (2006) RECIST revisited: a review of validation studies on tumour assessment. Eur J Cancer 42(8):1031-9
18. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228-47
19. Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U et al (1999) Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18 F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer 35(13):1773-82
20. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y et al (2009) From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J of Nucl Med 50(5):122S-50S
21. Boellaard R (2009) Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med 50(Suppl 1):11S-20S
22. Boellaard R (2011) Need for standardization of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for treatment response assessments. J Nucl Med 52(Suppl 2):93S-100S
23. Beyer T, Czernin J, Freudenberg LS (2011) Variations in clinical PET/CT operations: results of an international survey of active PET/CT users. J Nucl Med 52(2):303-10
24. Herder GJ, Kramer H, Hoekstra OS et al (2006) Traditional versus up-front [18 F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: a Dutch cooperative randomized study. J Clin Oncol 24(12):1800-6
25. Delso G, Martinez-Möller A, Bundschuh RA et al (2010) The effect of limited MR field of view in MR/PET attenuation correction. Med Phys 37(6):2804-12