Optimal Growth Modeling

Seminars in Perinatology

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 148-153

  Reeves, Shane ^a   Bernstein, Ira M ^a  

^a FLETCHER ALLEN HEALTH CARE   (United States)

Author keywords

fetal growth; fetal growth restriction; growth curves; IUGR; perinatal morbidity; ultrasound

Indexed keywords

BIRTH WEIGHT; FETUS GROWTH; GROWTH CURVE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; LARGE FOR GESTATIONAL AGE; MORBIDITY; NEWBORN DISEASE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; ULTRASOUND;

ANTHROPOMETRY; BIRTH WEIGHT; FEMALE; FETAL DEVELOPMENT; FETAL GROWTH RETARDATION; FETAL WEIGHT; GESTATIONAL AGE; GROWTH; HUMANS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; REFERENCE VALUES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 43149123983     PISSN: 01460005     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.11.001     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Lackman F., Capewell V., Richardson B., et al. The risks of spontaneous preterm delivery and perinatal mortality in relation to size at birth according to fetal versus neonatal growth standards. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184 (2001) 946-953
2. Bernstein I., Horbar J.D., Badger G.J., et al. Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182 (1999) 198-206
3. Hulsey T.C., Levkoff A.H., Alexander G.R., et al. Differences in black and white infant birth weights. South Med J 84 (1991) 443-446
4. Goldenberg R.L., Cliver S.P., and Cutter G.R. Black white differences in new born anthropometric measurements. Obstet Gynecol 78 (1991) 782-788
5. Yip R., Li Z., and Chong W.H. Race and birth weight: the Chinese example. Pediatrics 87 (1991) 688-693
6. Alver J., and Brooke O.G. Fetal growth in different racial groups. Arch Dis Child 53 (1978) 27-32
7. Graafmans W.C., Richardus J.H., Borsboom G.J., et al. Birth weight and perinatal mortality: a comparison of "optimal" birth weight in seven Western European countries. Epidemiology 13 (2002) 569-574
8. Hemming K., Hutton J.L., Glinianaia S.V., et al. Differences between European birth weight standards: impact on classification of "small for gestational age. " Dev Med Child Neurol 48 (2006) 906-912
9. Williams R.L., Creasy R.K., Cunningham G.C., et al. Fetal growth and prenatal viability in California. Obstet Gynecol 59 (1982) 624-632
10. Lubchenco L.O. Classification of high risk infants by birth weight and gestational age: an overview. Major Probl Clin Pediatr 14 (1976) 1-279
11. Warsof S.L., Gohari P., Berkowitz R.L., et al. The estimation of fetal weight by computer assisted analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 128 (1977) 881-892
12. Ott W.J. Intrauterine growth retardation and preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168 (1993) 1710-1715
13. Hadlock F.P., Harrist R.B., and Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology 181 (1991) 129-133
14. Bernstein I.M., Meyer M., and Capeless E. Fetal growth charts: comparison of cross-sectional ultrasound examinations with birth weight. J Matern Fetal Med 3 (1994) 182-186
15. Bernstein I.M., Mohs G., Rucquoi M., et al. Case for hybrid "fetal growth curves": a population-based estimation of normal fetal size across gestational age. J Matern Fetal Med 5 (1996) 124-127
16. Salomon L.J., Bernard J.P., and Ville Y. Estimation of fetal weight: reference range at 20-36 weeks' gestation and comparison with actual birth weight reference range. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29 (2007) 550-555
17. Arbuckle T.E., Wilikns R., and Sherman G.J. Birth weight percentiles by gestational age in Canada. Obstet Gynecol 81 (1993) 39-48
18. Zaw W., and Gagnon R. da Silva O: The risks of adverse neonatal outcome among preterm small for gestational age infants according to neonatal versus fetal growth standards. Pediatrics 111 (2003) 1273-1277
19. Romano-Zelekha O., Freedman L., Olmer L., et al. Should fetal weight growth curves be population specific?. Prenat Diagn 25 (2005) 709-714
20. Fry A.G., Bernstein I.M., and Badger G.J. Comparison of fetal growth estimates based on birth weight and ultrasound references. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 12 (2002) 247-252
21. Deter R.L., and Rossavik I.K. A simplified method for determining individual growth curve standards. Obstet Gynecol 70 (1987) 801-806
22. Shields L.E., Huff R.W., Jackson G.M., et al. Fetal growth: a comparison of growth curves with mathematical modeling. J Ultrasound Med 5 (1993) 271-274
23. Ariyuki Y., Hata T., and Kitao M. Evaluation of perinatal outcome using individualized growth assessment: comparison with conventional methods. Pediatrics 96 (1995) 36-42
24. Gardosi J., Chang A., Halyan B., et al. Customised antenatal growth charges. Lancet 339 (1992) 283-287
25. Gardosi J., Mongelli M., Wilcox M., et al. An adjustable fetal weight standard. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 6 (1995) 168-174
26. Wilcox M.A., Newton C.S., and Johnson I.R. Paternal influences on birthweight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 74 (1995) 15-18
27. Gardosi J. Customized fetal growth standards: rationale and clinical application. Semin Perinatol 28 (2004) 33-40
28. Clausson B., Gardosi J., Francis A., et al. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customized versus population-based birth weight standards. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 108 (2001) 830-834
29. Ego A., Subtil D., Gilles G., et al. Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: a French multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 (2006) 1042-1049
30. Figueras F., Figueras J., Meler E., et al. Customised birth weight standards accurately predict perinatal morbidity. Arch Dis Child Filtel Neonatal Ed 92 (2007) F277-F280