In vitro analysis of resistance to cyclic load and preload distribution of two implant/abutment screwed connections

Journal of Oral Implantology

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 293-301

  Murmura, Giovanna ^a   Di Iorio, Donato ^a   Cicchetti, Angelo Raffaele ^a   Sinjari, Bruna ^a   Caputi, Sergio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Abutment fixture connection; Cyclic load; Implant

Indexed keywords

DENTAL MATERIAL; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTAL SURGERY; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE;

DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; TORQUE;

EID: 84880320090     PISSN: 01606972     EISSN: 15481336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00144     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Longterm follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5: 347-359.
2. Schwarz M. A retrospective analysis of single tooth replacement with Branemark type implants. Paper presented at: Academy of Osteointegration 1991 Annual Meeting; March 2, 1991, Boston, Mass.
3. Ekfeldt A, Carlsson GE, Borjesson G. Clinical evaluation of single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:179-183.
4. Jemt T, Pettersson P. A 3-year follow-up study on single implant treatment. J Dent. 1993;21:203-208.
5. Haas, R, Mensdorff-Puilly N, Mailath G, Watzek G. Branemark single tooth implants: a preliminary report of 76 implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:274-279.
6. Worthington P, Bolender CL, Taylor TD. The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants: Problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1987;2:77-84.
7. Jemt T. Consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:270-276.
8. McGlumphy EA, Mendel DA, Holloway JA. Implant screw mechanics. Dent Clin North Am. 1998;42:71-89.
9. Perriard J, Wiskott WA, Mellal A, Scherrer SS, Botsis J, Belser UC. Fatigue resistance of ITI implant-abutment connectors - a comparison of the standard cone with a novel internally keyed design. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:542-549.
10. Cibirka RM, Nelson SK, Lang BR, Rueggeberg FA. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:268-275.
11. Cho SC, Small PN, Elian N, Tarnow D. Screw loosening for standard and wide diameter implants in partially edentulous cases: 3- to 7-year longitudinal data. Implant Dent. 2004;13:245-250.
12. Haack JE, Sakaguchi RL, Sun T, Coffey JP. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:529-536.
13. Lang LA, Kang B, Wang RF, Lang BR. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:539-546.
14. Bickford JH. An Introduction to the Design and Behavior of Bolted Joints. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1995:56-71.
15. Guda T, Ross TA, Lang LA, Millwater HR. Probabilistic analysis of preload in the abutment screw of a dental implant complex. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:183-193.
16. Sakaguchi RL, Borgersen SE. Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:295-302.