Binomial confidence intervals and contingency tests: Mathematical fundamentals and the evaluation of alternative methods

Journal of Quantitative Linguistics

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 178-208

  Wallis, Sean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880318018     PISSN: 09296174     EISSN: 17445035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09296174.2013.799918     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Aarts, B., Close, J., & Wallis, S. A. (2013). Choices over time: methodological issues in investigating current change. Chapter 2. In B. Aarts, J. Close, G. Leech & S. A. Wallis (Eds), The Verb Phrase in English (pp. 14-45). Cambridge: CUP.
2. Brown, L. D., Cai, T., and, DaGupta, A. 2001. Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Statistical Science, 16: 101-133.
3. Dunning, T. 1993. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19 (1): 61-74.
4. Newcombe, R. G. 1998a. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Statistics in Medicine, 17: 857-872.
5. Sheskin, D. J. 1997. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures, Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press.
6. Wallis, S. A. (2011). Comparing tests for separability. London: Survey of English Usage. Retrieved 1 May 2013, from www.ucl.ac.uk/english-usage/ statspapers/comparing-x2-tests.pdf
7. Wallis, S. A. (2013). z-squared: The origin and use of. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 20:4.
8. Wilson, E.B. 1927. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 22: 209-212.