A polarized logit model

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 53, Issue , 2013, Pages 1-9

  De Grange, Louis ^a   González, Felipe ^a   Vargas, Ignacio ^a   Muñoz, Juan Carlos ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES   (Chile)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Endogeneity; Fixed point; Logit model; Maximum entropy; Prediction; Quadratic constraint

Indexed keywords

ENTROPY; FORECASTING; MAXIMUM ENTROPY METHODS;

DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS; ENDOGENEITY; FIXED POINTS; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES; LOGIT MODELING; OPTIMALITY CONDITIONS; PROBABILITY FUNCTIONS; QUADRATIC CONSTRAINT;

LOGISTIC REGRESSION;

DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; LOGIT ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM ENTROPY ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDICTION;

EID: 84880311289     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abrahamsson T., Lundqvist L. Formulation and estimation of combined network equilibrium models with applications to Stockholm. Transportation Science 1999, 33:80-100.
2. Anas A. Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models. Transportation Research 1983, 17B:13-23.
3. Berry S., Levinsohn J., Pakes A. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 1995, 63:841-889.
4. Bierlaire, M., 2003. BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland.
5. Blundell R., Powell J.L. Endogeneity in semiparametric binary response models. The Review of Economic Studies 2004, 71:655-679.
6. Boyce D., Bar-Gera H. Validation of multiclass urban travel forecasting models combining origin-destination, mode, and route choices. Journal of Regional Science 2003, 43:517-540.
7. Boyce D., LeBlanc L.J., Chon K., Lee Y., Lin K. Implementation and computational issues for combined models of location, destination, mode and route choice. Environment and Planning 1983, 15A:1219-1230.
8. Boyce D., LeBlanc L., Chon K. Network equilibrium models of urban location and travel choices: a retrospective survey. Journal of Regional Science 1988, 28:159-183.
9. Brice S. Derivation of nested transport models within a mathematical programming framework. Transportation Research 1989, 23B:19-28.
10. Brock W., Durlauf S. Discrete choice with social interactions. Review of Economic Studies 2001, 68:235-260.
11. Brock W., Durlauf S. Multinomial choice with social interactions. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System 2006, vol. 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Brouwer L. Uber abbildungen von Mannigfaltigkeiten. Mathematische Annalen 1912, 71:97-115.
13. Cohon J.L. Multi-Objective Programming and Planning 1978, Academic Press Inc., London.
14. De Cea J., Fernández J.E., De Grange L. Combined models with hierarchical demand choices: a multi-objective entropy optimization approach. Transport Reviews 2008, 28:415-438.
15. De Grange L., Fernández J.E., De Cea J. A consolidated model of trip distribution. Transportation Research 2010, 46E:61-75.
16. Donoso P., De Grange L. A microeconomic interpretation of the maximum entropy estimator of multinomial logit models and its equivalence to the maximum likelihood estimator. Entropy 2010, 12:2077-2084.
17. Donoso P., De Grange L., González F. A maximum entropy estimator for the aggregate hierarchical logit model. Entropy 2011, 13:1425-1445.
18. Dugundji E.R., Gulyás L. Socio-dynamic discrete choice on networks: impacts of agent heterogeneity on emergent outcomes. Environment and Planning 2008, 35B:1028-1054.
19. Dugundji E.R., Gulyás L. Socio-dynamic discrete choice on networks in space: the role of utility parameters and connectivity. Procedia Computer Science 2012, 10:827-832.
20. Dugundji E.R., Gulyás L. Socio-dynamic discrete choice on networks in space: impact of initial conditions, network size and connectivity on emergent outcomes in a simple nested logit model. Studies in Computational Intelligence Series 2013, 424:149-160.
21. Fang S.C., Tsao H. Linearly-constrained entropy maximization problem with quadratic cost and its applications to transportation planning problems. Transportation Science 1995, 29:353-365.
22. Fang S., Rasajekera J., Tsao H. Entropy Optimization and Mathematical Programming 1997, Kluwer Academic Publisher, (2nd Printing).
23. Fernández J.E., De Cea J., Florian M., Cabrera E. Network equilibrium models with combined modes. Transportation Science 1994, 28:182-192.
24. Florian M., Wu J.H., He S. A multi-class multi-mode variable demand network equilibrium model with hierarchical logit structures. Transportation and Network Analysis: Current Trends 2002, 119-133. Kluwer, Dordrecht. M. Gendreau, P. Marcotte (Eds.).
25. Fotheringham A.S. Modeling hierarchical destination choice. Environment and Planning 1986, 18A:401-418.
26. García R., Marín A. Network equilibrium with combined modes: models and solution algorithms. Transportation Research 2005, 39B:223-254.
27. Gaudry M., Degenais M. The dogit model. Transportation Research 1979, 13B:105-111.
28. Greene W. Econometric Analysis 2011, Prentice Hall. seventh ed.
29. Ham H., Tschangho J.K., Boyce D. Implementation and estimation of a combined model of interregional, multimodal commodity shipments and transportation network flows. Transportation Research 2005, 39B:65-79.
30. Horowitz J.H. Statistical comparison of non-nested probabilistic discrete choice models. Transportation Science 1983, 17:319-350.
31. Lee L., Li J., Lin X. Binary Choice Models with Social Interactions under Heterogeneous Rational Expectations 2007, Unpublished Working Paper.
32. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics 1974, Academic Press, New York. P. Zarembka (Ed.).
33. Oppenheim N. Urban Travel Demand Modeling 1995, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
34. de D.Ortúzar J., Willumsen L.G. Modelling Transport 2011, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
35. Petrin A., Train K. A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. Journal of Marketing Research 2010, 47:370-379.
36. Raveau S., Muñoz J.C., De Grange L. A topological route choice model for metro. Transportation Research 2011, 45A:138-147.
37. Safwat K., Magnanti T. A combined trip generation, trip distribution, modal split and traffic assignment model. Transportation Science 1988, 22:14-30.
38. SECTRA, 2011. Actualización y Diagnóstico del Sistema de Transporte Urbano de la Ciudad de Antofagasta, Etapa I. http://www.sectra.cl.
39. Soetevent A., Kooreman P. A disecrete-choice model with social interaction: with an application to hight school teen behaviour. Journal of Applied Econometric 2007, 22:599-624.
40. Thorsen I., Gitlesen J.P. Empirical evaluation of alternative model specifications to predict commuting flows. Journal of Regional Science 1998, 38:273-292.
41. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. second ed.
42. Walker J.L., Ehlers E., Banerjee I., Dugundji E.R. Correcting for endogeneity in behavioral choice models with social influence variables. Transportation Research 2011, 45A:362-374.
43. Williams H.C.W.L. On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment and Planning 1977, 9A:285-344.
44. Wilson A.G. Entropy in Urban and Regional Modeling 1970, Pion, London.