A topological route choice model for metro

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 138-147

  Raveau, Sebastián ^a   Muñoz, Juan Carlos ^a   de Grange, Louis ^b  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES   (Chile)

Author keywords

Angular cost; Model specification; Network topology; Perceptions; Route choice

Indexed keywords

SENSORY PERCEPTION; SPECIFICATIONS; TRAVEL TIME; URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS; INFORMATION GATHERING; MODEL SPECIFICATIONS; NETWORK TOPOLOGY; PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS; PUBLIC TRANSIT NETWORKS; ROUTE CHOICE; TOPOLOGICAL VARIABLES;

TOPOLOGY;

DEMOGRAPHIC TREND; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; TOPOLOGY; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 78751581599     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2010.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ben-Akiva M.E., Walker J., Bernardino A.T., Gopinath D.A., Morikawa T., Polydoropoulou A. Integration of choice and latent variable models. In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behaviour Research Opportunities and Challenges 2002, 431-470. Pergamon, Amsterdam. H.S. Mahmassani (Ed.).
2. Conroy-Dalton R. The secret is to follow your nose: route path selection and angularity. Environment and Behavior 2003, 35:107-131.
3. Daganzo C.F., Sheffi Y. On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transportation Science 1977, 11:253-274.
4. Dial R.B. A probabilistic multipath traffic assignment model which obviates path enumeration. Transportation Research 1971, 5:83-113.
5. Montello D.R. Spatial orientation and the angularity of urban routes: a field study. Environment and Behavior 1991, 23:47-69.
6. Ortúzar J.de.D., Willumsen L. Modelling Transport 2001, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
7. Papinski D., Scott D.M., Goherty S.T. Exploring the route choice decision-making process: a comparison of planned and observed routes obtained using person-based GPS. Transportation Research Part F 2009, 12:347-358.
8. Prato, C.G., Bekhor, S., Pronello, C., 2009. Latent variables and route choice behavior. In: 12th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Jaipur, India.
9. Prashker J.N., Bekhor S. Route choice models used in the stochastic user equilibrium problem: a review. Transport Reviews 2004, 24:437-463.
10. Ramming, M.S., 2001. Network knowledge and route choice. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
11. Raveau S., Álvarez-Daziano R., Yáñez M.F., Bolduc D., Ortúzar J.deD. Sequential and simultaneous estimation of hybrid discrete choice models: some new findings. Transportation Research Record 2010, 2156:131-139.
12. Turner, A., 2001. Angular analysis. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Space Syntax, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, pp. 30.1-30.11.
13. Tversky B. Distortions in cognitive maps. Geoforum 1992, 23:131-138.