Structural pounding between adjacent buildings subjected to strong ground motions: Part I: The effect of different structures arrangement

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 42, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1509-1528

  Efraimiadou, Sofia ^a   Hatzigeorgiou, George D ^b   Beskos, Dimitri E ^c,d  

^a ASAnastasiadis Associate   (Greece)

^b DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

^d BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (Greece)

Author keywords

Different building configurations; Non linear seismic behaviour; Structural pounding

Indexed keywords

SEISMIC RESPONSE;

ADJACENT BUILDINGS; BUILDING CONFIGURATION; DIFFERENT STRUCTURE; MAXIMUM DISPLACEMENT; PERMANENT DISPLACEMENTS; SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR; STRONG GROUND MOTION; STRUCTURAL POUNDING;

EARTHQUAKES;

BUILDING; CONCRETE STRUCTURE; GROUND MOTION; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRONG MOTION;

EID: 84880302975     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2285     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bertero VV, Collins RG. Investigation of the failures of the Olive View stair-towers during the San Fernando earthquake and their implications on seismic design. Report No. EERC 73-26, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1973.
2. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. Impressions of the Guerrero-Michoacan, Mexico earthquake of 19 September 1985. EERI Preliminary Reconnaissance Report, 1985.
3. Moehle JP, Mahin SA. Observations on the behavior of reinforced concrete buildings during earthquakes. Earthquake-resistant Concrete Structures Inelastic Response and Design, Ghosh SK (ed.). American Concrete Institute: Detroit, MI, 1991.
4. Kasai K, Jagiasi AR, Jeng V. Inelastic vibration phase theory for seismic pounding mitigation. Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE 1996; 122(10):1136-1146.
5. Penzien J. Evaluation of building separation distance required to prevent pounding during strong earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996; 26(8):849-858.
6. Rosenblueth E, Meli R. The 1985 Earthquake: causes and effects in Mexico City. Concrete International 8(5):23-34.
7. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance; Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, EN 1998-1, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2005.
8. Abdullah M, Hanif J, Sobanjo J, Richardson A. Use of a shared tuned mass damper (STMD) to reduce vibration and pounding in adjacent structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:1185-1201.
9. Zhang WS, Xu YL. Dynamic characteristics and seismic response of adjacent buildings linked by discrete dampers. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28:1163-1185.
10. Anagnostopoulos SA, Karamaneas CE. Use of collision shear walls to minimize seismic separation and to protect adjacent buildings from collapse due to earthquake-induced pounding. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2008; 37:1371-1388.
11. Anagnostopoulos SA. Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1988; 16:443-456.
12. Anagnostopoulos SA, Spiliopoulos KV. An investigation of earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21:289-302.
13. Anagnostopoulos SA. Earthquake induced pounding: state of the art. Proceedings, 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, AA. Balkema: Rotterdam, 1995; 897-905.
14. Spiliopoulos KV, Anagnostopoulos SA. Measures against earthquake pounding between adjacent buildings. Proc. 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Elsevier: Acapulco, Mexico, 1996.
15. Anagnostopoulos SA. Equivalent viscous damping for modeling inelastic impacts in earthquake pounding problems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33:897-902.
16. Papadrakakis M, Apostolopoulou C, Zacharopoulos A, Bitzarakis S. Three-dimensional simulation of structural pounding during earthquakes. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1996; 122:423-431.
17. Papadrakakis M, Mouzakis H. Earthquake simulator testing of pounding between adjacent buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1995; 24:811-834.
18. Jankowski R, Wilde K, Fujino Y. Pounding of superstructure segments in isolated elevated bridge during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27:487-502.
19. Jankowski R. Earthquake-induced pounding between equal height buildings with substantially different dynamic properties. Engineering Structures 2008; 30:2818-2829.
20. Jankowski R, Wilde K, Fujino Y. Reduction of pounding effects in elevated bridges during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29:195-212.
21. Jankowski R. Non-linear viscoelastic modelling of earthquake-induced structural pounding. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:595-611.
22. Jankowski R. Pounding force response spectrum under earthquake excitation. Engineering Structures 2006; 28:1149-1161.
23. Jankowski R. Analytical expression between the impact damping ratio and the coefficient of restitution in the non-linear viscoelastic model of structural pounding. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35:517-524.
24. Liolios A. A linear complementarity approach for the non-convex seismic frictional interaction between adjacent structures under instabilizing effects. Journal of Global Optimization 2000; 17:259-266.
25. Karayannis CG, Favvata MJ. Inter-story pounding between multistory reinforced concrete structures. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 2005; 20:505-526.
26. Karayannis CG, Favvata MJ. Earthquake induced interaction between adjacent reinforced concrete structures with non equal heights. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:1-20.
27. Pant DR, Wijeyewickrema AC. Structural performance of a base-isolated reinforced concrete building subjected to seismic pounding. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2012; 41(12):1709-1716.
28. Polycarpou PC, Komodromos P, Polycarpou AC. A nonlinear impact model for simulating the use of rubber shock absorbers for mitigating the effects of structural pounding during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2013; 42(1):81-100.
29. Barbato M, Tubaldi E. A probabilistic performance-based approach for mitigating the seismic pounding risk between adjacent buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Article in Press, 2013.
30. Cole GL, Dhakal RP, Carr AJ, Bull DK. Building pounding state of the art: Identifying structures vulnerable to pounding damage. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Conference-NZSEE, Wellington, New Zealand, 2010, paper P11.
31. Anagnostopoulos SA. Building pounding re-examined: how serious a problem is it? Invited paper. Proc. 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Elsevier: Acapulco, Mexico, 1996.
32. Carr AJ. RUAUMOKO-Inelastic Dynamic Analysis Program. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury: Christchurch, New Zealand, 2008.
33. EN 1991-1-1 Eurocode 1: actions on structures-part 1-1: general actions-densities, self-weight, imposed loads for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2002.
34. EN 1992-1-1 Eurocode 2: design of concrete structure-part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2004.
35. Paulay T, Priestley MJN. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. Wiley: New York, 1992.
36. Chopra A. Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering, (3rd edn), Prentice Hall Inc.: New Jersey, 2006.
37. Anagnostopoulos SA. Inelastic beams for seismic analyses of structures. Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 1981; 107(7):1297-1311.
38. Anagnostopoulos SA. Post-yield flexural properties of tubular members. Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 1979; 105(9):1757-1768.
39. Banon H, Veneziano D. Seismic safety of reinforced concrete members and structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1982; 10:179-193.
40. Vidic T, Fajfar P, Fischinger M. Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1994; 23:502-521.
41. Tso WK, Zhu TJ, Heidebrecht HC. Seismic energy demands on reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1993; 22(5):533-545.
42. Fardis MN. Guidelines for Displacement-based Design of Buildings and Bridges. IUSS Press: Pavia, 2007.
43. Anagnostopoulos SA. Nonlinear dynamic response and ductility requirements of building structures subjected to earthquakes. Res. Report R72-54, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1972.
44. Takeda T, Sozen M, Nielsen N. Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes. Journal of Structural Division ASCE 1970; 96(12):2557-2573.
45. Otani S. Hysteretic models for reinforced concrete for earthquake analysis. Journal of Faculty of Architecture 1981; XXXVI(2):125-159.
46. Komodromos P. Simulation of the earthquake-induced pounding of seismically isolated buildings. Computers and Structures 2008; 86:618-626.
47. Karabalis DL, Cokkinides GJ, Rizos DC. Seismic Record Processing Program, Version 1.03. Report of the College of Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, 1992.
48. Greek Seismic Code. EAK 2000. Technical Chamber of Greece, Greek Government Journal-FEK 2184/B/99, Athens, Greece, 2000.
49. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA, Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:491-514.
50. SEAOC. Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary, Seismology Committee, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA, 1999.
51. Hatzigeorgiou GD, Papagiannopoulos GA, Beskos DE. Evaluation of maximum seismic displacements of SDOF systems from their residual deformation. Engineering Structures 2011; 33(12):3422-3431.
52. Erochko J, Christopoulos C, Tremblay R, Choi H. Residual drift response of SMRFs and BRB frames in steel buildings designed according to ASCE 7-05. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 2011; 137(5):589-599.
53. Rodriguez ME, Restrepo JI, Carr AJ. Earthquake-induced floor horizontal accelerations in buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(3):693-718.
54. Chaudhuri SR, Hutchinson TC. Distribution of peak horizontal floor acceleration for estimating nonstructural element vulnerability. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004.
55. Park YJ, Ang AHS. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. Structural Division Journal ASCE 1985; 111(4):722-739.
56. Bertero RD, Bertero VV. Performance-based seismic engineering: the need for a reliable conceptual comprehensive approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:627-652.
57. Vasilopoulos AA, Beskos DE. Seismic design of plane steel frames using advanced methods of analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2006; 26:1077-1100.
58. Kamaris GS, Hatzigeorgiou GD, Beskos DE. A new damage index for plane steel frames exhibiting strength and stiffness degradation under seismic motion. Engineering Structures 2013; 46:727-736.
59. Li Z, Hatzigeorgiou GD. Seismic damage analysis of RC structures using fiber beam-column elements. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2012; 32(1):103-110.
60. Ang AHS. Seismic damage assessment and basis for damage-limiting design. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 1988; 3:146-150.