Non-linear viscoelastic modelling of earthquake-induced structural pounding

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 595-611

  Jankowski, Robert ^a  

^a GDANSK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Earthquakes; Hertz contact law; Impact force; Non linear model; Structural pounding

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; VISCOELASTICITY;

COLLIDING STRUCTURES; NON-LINEAR VISCOELASTIC MODELING; STRUCTURAL POUNDING; STRUCTURAL RESPONSES;

NONLINEAR SYSTEMS;

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EID: 18744392529     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.434     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Rosenblueth E, Meli R. The 1985 earthquake: causes and effects in Mexico City. Concrete International 1986; 8:23-34.
2. Anagnostopoulos SA. Building pounding re-examined: how serious a problem is it? Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, 23-28 June 1996, paper no. 2108.
3. Kasai K, Maison BF. Building pounding damage during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Engineering Structures 1997; 19:195-207.
4. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Northridge Earthquake of 17 January 1994-Reconnaissance Report. EERI Report 95-03, Vol. 1, Oakland, USA, 1995.
5. Otsuka H, Unjoh S, Terayama T, Hoshikuma J, Kosa K. Damage to highway bridges by the 1995 Hyogoken Nanbu earthquake and the retrofit of highway bridges in Japan. Third U.S.-Japan Workshop on Seismic Retrofit of Bridges, Osaka, Japan, 10-11 December 1996.
6. Anagnostopoulos SA. Earthquake induced pounding: State of the art. Proceedings of 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, Austria, September 1994, 897-905.
7. Anagnostopoulos SA, Spiliopoulos KV. An investigation of earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21:289-302.
8. Maison BF, Kasai K. Dynamics of pounding when two buildings collide. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21:771-786.
9. Papadrakakis M, Mouzakis H, Plevris N, Bitzarakis S. A Lagrange multiplier solution method for pounding of buildings during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1991; 20 :981-998.
10. Jankowski R, Wilde K, Fujino Y. Pounding of superstructure segments in isolated elevated bridge during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27:487-502.
11. Zanardo G, Hao H, Modena C. Seismic response of multi-span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31 :1325-1345.
12. Jeng V, Kasai K. Spectral relative motion of two structures due to seismic travel waves. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1996; 122:1128-1135.
13. Jankowski R, Wilde K. A simple method of conditional random field simulation of ground motions for long structures. Engineering Structures 2000; 22:552-561.
14. Anagnostopoulos SA. Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1988;16 :443-456.
15. Jankowski R, Wilde K, Fujino Y. Reduction of pounding effects in elevated bridges during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29:195-212.
16. Jing H-S, Young M. Impact interactions between two vibration systems under random excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1991; 20:667-681.
17. Pantelides CP, Ma X. Linear and nonlinear pounding of structural systems. Computers and Structures 1998; 66:79-92.
18. Chan KT, Wei XX. Pounding of structures modelled as non-linear impacts of two oscillators. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:633-651.
19. Penzien J. Evaluation of building separation distance required to prevent pounding during strong earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1997; 26:849-858.
20. Westermo BD. The dynamics of interstructural connection to prevent pounding. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1989; 18:687-699.
21. Goldsmith W. Impact: The Theory and Physical Behaviour of Colliding Solids, 1st edn, Edward Arnold: London, U.K., 1960.
22. DesRoches R, Muthukumar S. Effect of pounding and restrainers on seismic response of multiple-frame bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2002; 128:860-869.
23. Ruangrassamee A, Kawashima K. Relative displacement response spectra with pounding effect. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:1511-1538.
24. Azevedo J, Bento R. Design criteria for buildings subjected to pounding. Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, 23-28 June 1996, paper no. 1063.
25. Zhu P, Abe M, Fujino Y. Modelling three-dimensional non-linear seismic performance of elevated bridges with emphasis on pounding of girders. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31 :1891-1913.
26. van Mier JGM, Pruijssers AF, Reinhardt HW, Monnier T. Load-time response of colliding concrete bodies. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1991; 117:354-374.
27. Goland M, Wickersham PD, Dengler MA. Propagation of elastic impact in beams in bending. Journal of Applied Mechanics 1955; 22:1-7.
28. Filiatrault A, Wagner P, Cherry S. Analytical prediction of experimental building pounding. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1995; 24:1131-1154.
29. Kim S-H, Shinozuka M. Effects of seismically induced pounding at expansion joints of concrete bridges. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2003; 129:1225-1234.
30. Valles RE, Reinhorn AM. Evaluation, prevention and mitigation of pounding effects in building structures. Technical Report NCEER-97-0001, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, U.S.A., 1997.
31. Chau KT, Wei XX, Guo X, Shen CY. Experimental and theoretical simulations of seismic poundings between two adjacent structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32 :537-554. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.231.
32. Anagnostopoulos SA. Equivalent viscous damping for modeling inelastic impacts in earthquake pounding problems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33:897-902. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.377.
33. Bendat JS, Piersol AG. Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures; Wiley-Interscience: New York, U.S.A., 1971.