PoCoS - Potsdam coreference scheme

ACL 2007: The LAW - Proceedings of The Linguistic Annotation Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 156-163

  Krasavina, Olga ^a   Chiarcos, Christian ^b  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COARSE-GRAINED; COREFERENCE; MARK-UP; MINIMAL DESIGNS; POTSDAM;

DATA MINING;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84880300031     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. 3=Alpha (or Beta). Technical Report CSM-437, Univ. of Essex.
2. Carlson, L., D. Marcu and M. E. Okurowski. 2003.Building a Discourse-Tagged Corpus in the Framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Current directions in discourse and dialogue, Kluwer.
3. Deemter van, K. and R Kibble. 1999. What is coreference, and what should coreference annotation be? Proc. of the ACL Workshop on Coreference.
4. Ge, M, J. Hale, and E. Charniak. 1998. A statistical approach to anaphora resolution. Proc. of the Sixth Workshop on very Large Corpora.
5. Holler, A., J.F.Maas and A.Storrer. 2004. Exploiting Coreference Annotations for Text-to-Hypertext Conversion. Proc. of LREC 2004, Lissabon, Portugal.
6. Hirschman, L. 1997. MUC-7 coreference task definition. Version 3.0.
7. Karttunen, L. 1976. Discourse referents. Syntax and Semantics. J. McCawley, New York Academic Press.
8. Krasavina, O., Ch. Chiarcos and D. Zalmanov. 2007. Aspects of topicality in the use of demonstrative expressions in German, English and Russian. Proc. of DAARC-2007, Lagos, Portugal, 29-30 March.
9. Kučová, L. and E. Hajičová (2004). Prague Dependency Treebank: Enrichment of the Underlying Syntactic Annotation by Coreferential Mark-Up. The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 81.
10. Leech, G. and J. Svartvik. 2003. A communicative grammar of English. London [u.a.].
11. Leech, G. and A. Wilson. 1996. EAGLES Recommendations for the Morphosyntactic Annotation of Corpora. www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES/annotate/annotate. html.
12. Mitkov, R. 2002. Anaphora resolution. London [u.a.].
13. Naumann, K. 2006. Manual for the Annotation of indocument Referential Relations. http://www.sfs.unituebingen.de/de-tuebadz.shtml (July 2006).
14. Passonneau, R. 1996. Instructions for applying Discourse Reference Annotation for Multiple Applications (DRAMA). Unpublished document.
15. Poesio, M. 2004 The MATE/GNOME Proposals for Anaphoric Annotation, Revisited. Proc. of SIGDIAL.
16. Poesio, M. and R. Artstein, 2005. Annotating (Anaphoric) Ambiguity. Proc. of Corpus Linguistics-05.
17. Popescu-Belis, A., L. Rigouste, S. Salmon-Alt, and L Romary. 2004, Online Evaluation of Coreference Resolution. Proc. of LREC 2004.
18. Rocha de, M. 1997. Supporting anaphor resolution with a corpus-based probabilistic model. Proc. of the ACL'97 workshop on Operational factors in practical, robust anaphora resolution. Madrid, Spain.
19. Stede, M. 2004. The Potsdam Commentary Corpus. Proc. of ACL-04 Workshop on Discourse Annotation, Barcelona, July.
20. Versley, Y. 2006. Disagreement Dissected: Vagueness as a Source of Ambiguity in Nominal (Co-) Reference. Proceedings of the ESSLLI 2006 Workshop on Ambiguity in Anaphora.