Efficient annotation with the jena annotation environment (JANE)

ACL 2007: The LAW - Proceedings of The Linguistic Annotation Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 9-16

  Tomanek, Katrin ^a   Wermter, Joachim ^a   Hahn, Udo ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINGUISTICS;

ACTIVE LEARNING; LANGUAGE RESOURCES; REAL-WORLD;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 84880254838     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1642059.1642061     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Lynn Carlson, Daniel Marcu, and Mary E. Okurowski. 2003. Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory. In J. van Kuppevelt and R. Smith, editors, Current Directions in Discourse and Dialogue, pp. 85-112. Kluwer.
2. Sean Engelson and Ido Dagan. 1996. Minimizing manual annotation cost in supervised training from corpora. In Proc. of ACL 1996, pp. 319-326.
3. B. Hachey, B. Alex, and M. Becker. 2005. Investigating the effects of selective sampling on the annotation task. In Proc. of CoNLL-2005, pp. 144-151.
4. Rebecca Hwa. 2000. Sample selection for statistical grammar induction. In Proc. of EMNLP/VLC-2000, pp. 45-52.
5. Jin-Dong Kim and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2006. Corpora and their annotation. In S. Ananiadou and J. McNaught, editors, Text Mining for Biology and Biomedicine, pp. 179-211. Artech.
6. M. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. A. Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The PENN TREEBANK. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
7. C. M̈uller and M. Strube. 2003. Multi-level annotation in MMAX. In Proc. of the 4th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, pp. 198-207.
8. Grace Ngai and David Yarowsky. 2000. Rule writing or annotation: Cost-efficient resource usage for base noun phrase chunking. In Proc. of ACL 2000, pp. 117-125.
9. Tomoko Ohta, Yuka Tateisi, and Jin-Dong Kim. 2002. The GENIA corpus: An annotated research abstract corpus in molecular biology domain. In Proc. of HLT 2002, pp. 82-86.
10. Martha Palmer, Daniel Gildea, and Paul Kingsbury. 2005. The Proposition Bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1):71-106.
11. David Pierce and Claire Cardie. 2001. Limitations of cotraining for natural language learning from large datasets. In Proc. of EMNLP 2001, pp. 1-9.
12. James Pustejovsky, Patrick Hanks, Roser Sauŕi, Andrew See, Robert Gaizauskas, Andrea Setzer, Dragomir Radev, Beth Sundheim, David Day, Lisa Ferro, and Marcia Lazo. 2003. The TIMEBANK corpus. In Proc. of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference, pp. 647-656.
13. Burr Settles. 2004. Biomedical named entity recognition using conditional random fields and rich feature sets. In Proc. of JNLPBA 2004, pp. 107-110.
14. H. Sebastian Seung, Manfred Opper, and Haim Sompolinsky. 1992. Query by committee. In Proc. of COLT 1992, pp. 287-294.
15. Erik Tjong Kim Sang and Fien DeMeulder. 2003. Introduction to the CONLL-2003 shared task: Language-independent named entity recognition. In Proc. of CoNLL 2003, pp. 142- 147.
16. Katrin Tomanek, Joachim Wermter, and Udo Hahn. 2007. An approach to downsizing annotation costs and maintaining corpus reusability. In Proc of EMNLP-CoNLL 2007.
17. Kees van Deemter and Rodger Kibble. 2000. On coreferring: Coreference in MUC and related annotation schemes. Computational Linguistics, 26(4):629-637.
18. Janyce Wiebe, Theresa Wilson, and Claire Cardie. 2005. Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation, 39(2/3):165-210.