On interaction effects: The case of heckit and two-part models

Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik

Volumn 233, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 22-38

  Frondel, Manuel ^a   Vance, Colin ^a  

^a RWI LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880226864     PISSN: 00214027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/jbnst-2013-0104     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ai, C., E. C. Norton (2003), Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters 80:123-129.
2. Dow, W. H., E. C. Norton (2003), Choosing Between and Interpreting the Heckit and Two-Part Models for Corner Solutions. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology 4:5-18.
3. Duan, N., W. Manning, C. Morris, J. Newhouse (1984), Choosing between the Sample-Selection Model and the Multi-Part Model. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2:283-289.
4. Frondel, M., J. Peters, C. Vance (2008), Identifying the Rebound: Evidence from a German Household Panel. The Energy Journal 29(4):154-163.
5. Frondel, M., C. Vance (2009), Do High Oil Prices Matter? Evidence on the Mobility Behavior of German Households. Environmental and Resource Economics 43(1):81-94.
6. Frondel, M., C. Vance (2010), Driving for Fun? Comparing the Effect of Fuel Prices on Weekday and Weekend Fuel Consumption. Energy Economics 32(1):102-109.
7. Greene, W. H. (2007), Limdep version 9.0, Econometric modeling guide. Plainview, New York: Econometric Software Inc.
8. Greene, W. H. (2010), Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in non-linear models. Economics Letters 107:291-296.
9. Heckman, J. (1979), Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153-161.
10. KBA (Kraftfahrt Bundesamt) (2012), Stock of private cars. http://www.kba.de/nn-268956/DE/Statistik/Fahrzeuge/Bestand/Halter/z-b-halter. html, retrieved March 24, 2012.
11. Lee, B., J. McDonald (2003), Determinants of commuting time and distance for Seoul residents: The impact of family status on the commuting of women. Urban Studies 40(7):1283-1302.
12. McDonald, N. (2005), Does the Built Environment Affect the Travel 'Gender Gap'? Conference Proceedings 35: Research on Women's Issues in Transportation; Volume 2: Technical Papers. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
13. MOP (2012), German Mobility Panel. http://www.ifv. uni-karlsruhe.de/MOP. html, retrieved March 24, 2012.
14. Norton, E. C., H. Wang, C. Ai (2004), Computing Interaction Effects and Standard Errors in Logit and Probit Models. The Stata Journal 4(2):103-116.
15. STABUA (Federal Statistical Office) (2006), Germany's Population by 2050: Results of the 11th coordinated population projection. http://www.destatis.de, retrieved March 24, 2012.
16. Vance, C. (2009), Marginal effects and significance testing with Heckman's sample selection model: A methodological note. Applied Economics Letters 16:1415-1419.
17. White, M. (1986), Sex differences in urban commuting patterns. American Economic Review 76(2):368-372.