Do high oil prices matter? Evidence on the mobility behavior of german households

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 81-94

  Frondel, Manuel ^a   Vance, Colin ^a  

^a RWI LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automobile travel; Rebound effect; Two Part Model

Indexed keywords

COSTS; ECONOMICS; ELASTICITY; FUELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

AUTOMOBILE TRAVELS; CENSORED REGRESSION; DECISION PROCESS; FUEL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS; MOBILITY BEHAVIOR; POLICY MEASURES; REBOUND EFFECT; REDUCING EMISSIONS;

FUEL ECONOMY;

AUTOMOBILE; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FUEL CONSUMPTION; MOVEMENT; OIL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY;

EID: 67349259345     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-008-9246-4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. GS Becker 1965 A theory of the allocation of time Econ J 75 493 517
2. M Binswanger 2001 Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecol Econ 36 119 132
3. WH Dow EC Norton 2003 Choosing between and interpreting the Heckit and Two-Part Models for corner solutions Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 4 5 18
4. N Duan W Manning C Morris J Newhouse 1984 Choosing between the Sample-Selection Model and the Multi-Part Model J Bus Econ Stat 2 283 289
5. 2 emissions from passenger cars, Impact Assessment, COM(2007)865 final, SEC, 2007, p 1724
6. M Frondel J Peters C Vance 2008 Identifying the rebound: evidence from a German Household Panel Energy J 29 4 154 163
7. P Goodwin J Dargay M Hanly 2004 Elasticities of road traffic and fuel consumption with respect to price and income: a review Transp Rev 24 3 275 292
8. DL Greene JR Kahn RC Gibson 1999 Fuel economy rebound effect for U.S. household vehicles Energy J 20 3 1 31
9. Greening LA, Greene DL (1997) Energy use, technical efficiency and the rebound effect: a review of the Literature. Report to the Office of Policy Analysis and International Affairs, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC
10. J Hay R Olsen 1984 Let them eat cake: a note on comparing alternative models of the demand for medical care J Bus Econ Stat 2 279 282
11. J Heckman 1979 Sample selection bias as a specification error Econometrica 47 153 161
12. G King J Honaker A Joseph K Scheve 2001 Analyzing incomplete political science data: an alternative algorithm for multiple imputation Am Polit Sci Rev 95 49 69
13. SF Lueng S Yu 1996 On the choice between sample selection and Two-Part Models J Econom 72 197 229
14. MiD (Mobilität in Deutschland) (2008) German Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs. http://www.kontiv2002.de/publikationen. htm
15. MOP (German Mobility Panel) (2007) http://www.ifv.uni-karlsruhe.de/MOP. html
16. KA Small K Van Dender 2007 Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: the declining rebound effect Energy J 28 1 25 52
17. S Sorrell J Dimitropoulos 2008 The rebound effect: microeconomic definitions limitations, and extensions Ecol Econ 65 3 636 649
18. T Sterner 2007 Fuel taxes: an important instrument for climate policy Energy Policy 35 3194 3202
19. IO Walker F Wirl 1993 Asymmetric energy demand due to endogenous efficiencies: an empirical investigation of the transport sector Energy J 14 183 205
20. SE West 2004 Distributional effects of alternative vehicle pollution control policies J Public Econ 88 3-4 735 757