The ozone hole indirect effect: Cloud-radiative anomalies accompanying the poleward shift of the eddy-driven jet in the Southern Hemisphere

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 40, Issue 14, 2013, Pages 3688-3692

  Grise, Kevin M ^a   Polvani, Lorenzo M ^a,b   Tselioudis, George ^b,c   Wu, Yutian ^d   Zelinka, Mark D ^e  

^a International Research Institute for Climate and Society   (United States)

^b Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences   (United States)

^c NASA GODDARD INSTITUTE FOR SPACE STUDIES   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

cloud radiative processes; ozone hole

Indexed keywords

ANTARCTIC OZONE HOLE; MODEL INTEGRATION; OZONE HOLE; RADIATION RESPONSE; SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS; SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE; STRATOSPHERIC OZONE DEPLETION; TROPOSPHERIC CIRCULATION;

EARTH SCIENCES; GEOPHYSICS;

OZONE;

CLOUD RADIATIVE FORCING; FRACTIONATION; OZONE; RADIATION BALANCE; SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE; STRATOSPHERE; TROPOSPHERE;

ANTARCTICA; SOUTHERN OCEAN;

EID: 84880216867     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: 19448007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/grl.50675     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bender, F. A.-M., et al. (2012), Changes in extratropical storm track cloudiness 1983-2008: Observational support for a poleward shift, Clim. Dyn., 38, 2037-2053.
2. Ceppi, P., et al. (2012), Southern Hemisphere jet latitude biases in CMIP5 models linked to shortwave cloud forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L19708, doi: 10.1029/2012GL053115.
3. Cionni, I., et al. (2011), Ozone database in support of CMIP5 simulations: Results and corresponding radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11,267-11,292.
4. Collins, W. D., et al. (2006), The formulation and atmospheric simulation of CAM3, J. Clim., 19, 2144-2161.
5. Dee, D. P., et al. (2011), The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 137, 553-597.
6. Forster, P., et al. (2007), Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing, in IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, edited by, S. Solomon, et al., pp. 129-234, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K.
7. Kay, J., et al. (2012), Exposing global cloud biases in CAM using satellite observations and their corresponding instrument simulators, J. Clim., 25, 5190-5207.
8. Klein, S. A., and, C. Jakob, (1999), Validation and sensitivities of frontal clouds simulated by the ECMWF model, Mon. Weather Rev., 127, 2514-2531.
9. Klein, S. A., et al. (2013), Are climate model simulations of clouds improving? An evaluation using the ISCCP simulator, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 1329-1342, doi: 10.1002/jgrd.50141.
10. Polvani, L. M., et al. (2011), Stratospheric ozone depletion: The main driver of twentieth century atmospheric circulation changes in the Southern Hemisphere, J. Clim., 24, 795-812.
11. Rossow, W. B., and, R. A. Schiffer, (1999), Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 2261-2287.
12. Thompson, D. W. J., et al. (2011), Signatures of the Antarctic ozone hole in Southern Hemisphere surface climate change, Nat. Geosci., 4, 741-749.
13. Tselioudis, G., and, W. B. Rossow, (2006), Climate feedback implied by observed radiation and precipitation changes with midlatitude storm strength and frequency, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L02704, doi: 10.1029/2005GL024513.
14. Tsushima, Y., et al. (2006), Importance of the mixed-phase cloud distribution in the control climate for assessing the response of clouds to carbon dioxide increase: A multi-model study, Clim. Dyn., 27, 113-126.
15. Wu, Y., et al. (2013), The importance of the Montreal Protocol in protecting Earth's hydroclimate, J. Clim., 26, 4049-4068, doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00675.1.
16. Zelinka, M. D., et al. (2012), Computing and partitioning cloud feedbacks using cloud property histograms. Part I: Cloud radiative kernels, J. Clim., 25, 3715-3735.