Are climate model simulations of clouds improving? An evaluation using the ISCCP simulator

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Volumn 118, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 1329-1342

  Klein, Stephen A ^a   Zhang, Yuying ^a   Zelinka, Mark D ^a   Pincus, Robert ^b   Boyle, James ^a   Gleckler, Peter J ^a  

^a LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

climate models; clouds; satellite simulator

Indexed keywords

CLOUDS; ERRORS; SATELLITE SIMULATORS;

CLIMATE MODEL SIMULATIONS; CLOUD TOP PRESSURE; COMPENSATING ERRORS; HIGHLY REFLECTIVE; INDIVIDUAL MODELS; OPTICAL THICKNESS; RADIATION BALANCE; SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS;

CLIMATE MODELS;

ANNUAL CYCLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE MODELING; ERROR ANALYSIS; OPTICAL PROPERTY; REFLECTIVITY; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SIMULATION;

EID: 84880268669     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21698996     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50141     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Andrews, T., J. M. Gregory, M. J. Webb, and, K. E. Taylor, (2012), Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L09712, doi: 10.1029/2012GL051607.
2. Bodas-Salcedo, A., et al. (2011), COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92, 1023-1043.
3. Bony, S., and, J.-L. duFresne, (2005), Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L20806, doi: 10.1029/2005GL023851.
4. Bony, S., M. Webb, C. Bretherton, S. Klein, P. Siebesma, G. Tselioudis, and, M. Zhang, (2011), CFMIP: Towards a better evaluation and understanding of clouds and cloud feedbacks in CMIP5 models, CLIVAR Exchanges, 56, International CLIVAR Project Office, Southampton, United Kingdom, 20-24.
5. Bretherton, C. S., and, S. Park, (2009), A new moist turbulence parameterization in the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Clim., 22, 3422-3448.
6. Cessana, G., and, H. Chepfer, (2012), How well do climate models simulate cloud vertical structure? A comparison between CALIPSO-GOCCP satellite observations and CMIP5 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L20803, doi: 10.1029/2012GL053153.
7. Collins, W. D., et al. (2006), The formulation and atmospheric simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model Version 3 (CAM3), J. Clim., 19, 2144-2161. (Pubitemid 43881276)
8. Collins, W. J., et al. (2008), Evaluation of the HadGEM2 model, Met Office Hadley Centre Technical Note no. HCTN 74, Met Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter EX1 3 PB, United Kingdom.
9. Curry, J. A., W. B. Rossow, D. Randall, and, J. L. Schramm, (1996), Overview of Arctic cloud and radiation characteristics, J. Clim., 9, 1731-1764.
10. Dai, A., (2006), Precipitation characteristics in eighteen coupled climate models, J. Clim., 19, 4605-4630. (Pubitemid 44541872)
11. Donner, L. J., et al. (2011), The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3, J. Clim., 24, 3484-3519.
12. Garay, M. J., S. P. de Szoeke, and, C. M. Moroney, (2008), Comparison of marine stratocumulus cloud top heights in the southeastern Pacific retrieved from satellites with coincident ship-based observations, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D18204, doi: 10.1029/2008JD009975.
13. Gates, W. L., et al. (1999), An overview of the results of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP I), Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 29-55. (Pubitemid 129568503)
14. Gent, P. R., et al. (2011), The Community Climate System Model Version 4, J. Clim., 24, 4973-4991.
15. Gettelman, A., H. Morrison, and, S. J. Ghan, (2008), A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3), Part II: Single-column and global results, J. Clim., 21, 3660-3679.
16. GFDL GAMDT (2004), The new GFDL global atmosphere and land model AM2/LM2: Evaluation with prescribed SST simulations, J. Clim., 17, 4641-4673.
17. Gleckler, P. J., K. E. Taylor, and, C. Doutriaux, (2008), Performance metrics for climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D06104, doi: 10.1029/2007JD008972.
18. Gregory, J. M., and, M. J. Webb, (2008), Tropospheric adjustment induces a cloud component in CO2 forcing, J. Clim., 21, 58-71. (Pubitemid 351395658)
19. Hourdin, F., et al. (2006), The LMDZ4 general circulation model: climate performance and sensitivity to parametrized physics with emphasis on tropical convection, Clim. Dyn., 27, 787-813. (Pubitemid 44550673)
20. IPCC (2007), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, [, Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and, H. L. Miller, (eds.)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 996 pp.
21. Jiang, J., et al. (2012), Evaluation of cloud and water vapor simulations in CMIP5 climate models using NASA "A-Train" satellite observations, J. Geophys. Res., doi: 10.1029/2011JD017237.
22. Kay, J., et al. (2012), Exposing global cloud biases in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) using satellite observations and their corresponding instrument simulators, J. Clim., 25, 5190-5207.
23. Klein, S. A., and, C. Jakob, (1999), Validation and sensitivities of frontal clouds simulated by the ECMWF model, Mon. Weather Rev., 127, 2514-2531.
24. Lauer, A., and, K. Hamilton, (2012), Simulating clouds with global climate models: A comparison of CMIP5 results with CMIP3 and satellite data, J. Clim., doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00451.1, in press.
25. Lock, A. P., A. R. Brown, M. R. Bush, G. M. Martin, and, R. N. B. Smith, (2000), A new boundary layer mixing scheme. Part I: Scheme description and single-column model tests, Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 3187-3199.
26. Ma, C.-C., C. R. Mechoso, A. W. Robertson, and, A. Arakawa, (1996), Peruvian stratus clouds and the tropical pacific circulation: A coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM study, J. Clim., 9, 1635-1645.
27. Mace, G. G., Q. Zhang, M Vaughan, R. Marchand, G. Stephens, C. Trepte, and, D. Winker, (2009), A description of hydrometeor layer occurrence statistics derived from the first year of merged Cloudsat and CALIPSO data, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00A26, doi: 10.1029/2007JD009755.
28. Mace, G. G., S. Houser, S. Benson, S. A. Klein, and, Q. Min, (2011), Critical evaluation of the ISCCP simulator using ground-based remote sensing data, J. Clim., 24, 1598-1612.
29. Marchand, R., T. Ackerman, M. Smyth, and, W. B. Rossow, (2010), A review of cloud top height and optical depth histograms from MISR, ISCCP, and MODIS, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D16206, doi: 10.1029/2009JD013422.
30. Martin, G. M., et al. (2006), The physical properties of the atmosphere in the new Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model (HadGEM1). Part I: Model description and global climatology, J. Clim., 19, 1274-1301. (Pubitemid 43670778)
31. McAvaney, B. J., and, H. Le Treut, (2003), The cloud feedback intercomparison project: (CFMIP). CLIVAR Exchanges, 26, International CLIVAR Project Office, Southampton, United Kingdom, 1-4.
32. Meehl, G., C. Covey, T. L. Delworth, M. Latif, B. McAvaney, J. F. B. Mitchell, and, R. J. Stouffer, and, K. E. Taylor, (2007), The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset: A new era in climate change research, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88, 1383-1394. (Pubitemid 47616759)
33. Morrison, H., and, A. Gettelman, (2008), A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, Version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests, J. Clim., 21, 3642-3659.
34. Nam, C., S. Bony, J.-L. Dufresne, and, H. Chepfer, (2012), The 'too few, too bright' tropical low-cloud problem in CMIP5 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L21801, doi: 10.1029/2012GL053421.
35. Neale, R. B., et al. (2011), Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5), Technical Report NCAR/TN-486 + STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, U. S. A., 268 pp.
36. Ogura, T., et al. (2008), Towards understanding cloud response in atmospheric GCMs: The use of tendency diagnostics, J. Met. Soc. Japan, 86, 69-79.
37. Park, S., and, C. S. Bretherton, (2009), The University of Washington shallow convection and moist turbulence schemes and their impact on climate simulations with the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Clim., 22, 3449-3469.
38. Pincus, R., H. W. Barker, and, J. Morcrette, (2003), A fast, flexible, approximate technique for computing radiative transfer in inhomogeneous clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 108 (D13), 4376, doi: 10.1029/2002JD003322.
39. Pincus, R., C. P. Batstone, R. J. P. Hofmann, K. E. Taylor, and, P. J. Gleckler, (2008), Evaluating the present-day simulation of clouds, precipitation, and radiation in climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D14209, doi: 10.1029/2007JD009334.
40. Pincus, R., S. Platnick, S. A. Ackerman, R. S. Hemler, R. J. P. Hoffmann, (2012), Reconciling simulated and observed views of clouds: MODIS, ISCCP, and the limits of instrument simulators, J. Clim., 25, 4699-4720.
41. Pope, V. D., M. L. Gallani, P. R. Rowntree, and, R. A. Stratton, (2000), The impact of new physical parametrizations in the Hadley Centre climate model-HadAM3, Clim. Dyn., 16, 123-146. (Pubitemid 30192426)
42. Rossow, W. B., and, R. A. Schiffer, (1991), International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) cloud data products, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 72, 2-20.
43. Rossow, W. B., and, R. A. Schiffer, (1999), Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 2261-2288.
44. Slingo, A., and, J.-M. Slingo, (1988), The response of a general circulation model to cloud longwave radiative forcing. I. Introduction and initial experiments, Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc., 114, 1027-1062.
45. Stevens, B., et al. (2013), The atmospheric component of the MPI-M Earth System Model: ECHAM6, J. Adv. Model Earth Syst., doi: 10.1002/jame.20015.
46. Stubenrauch, C., S. Kinne, and the GEWEX Cloud Assessment Team (2009), Assessment of global cloud climatologies, GEWEX Newsletter, 19, International GEWEX Project Office, Silver Spring, Maryland, Unites States of America, 6-7.
47. Stephens, G., (2010), Is there a missing low-cloud feedback in current climate models? GEWEX Newsletter, 20, International GEWEX Project Office, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America, 5-7.
48. Taylor, K. E., R. J. Stouffer, and, G. A. Meehl, (2012), An overview of CMIP5 and the experimental design, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 485-498.
49. Voldoire, et al. (2012), The CNRM-CM5.1 global climate model: description and basic evaluation, Clim. Dyn., doi:10.1007/s00382-011-1259-y.
50. von Salzen, K., N. A. McFarlane, and, M. Lazare, (2005), The role of shallow convection in the water and energy cycles of the atmosphere, Clim. Dyn., 25, 671-688, doi: 10.1007/s00382-005-0051-2. (Pubitemid 41829829)
51. von Salzen, K., et al. (2012), The Canadian Fourth Generation Atmospheric Global Climate Model (CanAM4): Part I: Representation of physical processes, Atmos.-Ocean, in press.
52. Watanabe, M., et al. (2010), Improved climate simulation by MIROC5: Mean states, variability, and climate sensitivity, J. Clim., 23, 6312-6335.
53. Webb, M., C. Senior, S. Bony, and, J. J. Morcrette, (2001), Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess clouds in the Hadley Centre, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models, Clim. Dyn., 17, 905-922. (Pubitemid 32939776)
54. Webb, M. J., F. H. Lambert, and, J. M. Gregory, (2012), Origins of differences in climate sensitivity, forcing, and feedbacks in climate models, Clim. Dyn., doi: 10.1007/s00382-012-1336-x.
55. Williams, K. D., and, M. J. Webb, (2009), A quantitative performance assessment of cloud regimes in climate models. Clim. Dyn., 33, 141-157.
56. Wilson, D. R., and, S. P. Ballard, (1999), A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the U. K. Meteorological Office Unified Model, Q. J. Roy. Met. Soc., 125, 1607-1636. (Pubitemid 29524315)
57. Winker, D., et al. (2009), Overview of the CALIPSO mission and CALIOP data processing algorithms, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 2310-2323.
58. Wu, T., et al. (2010), The Beijing Climate Center atmospheric general circulation model: description and its performance for the present-day climate, Clim. Dyn., 34, 123-147, doi: 10.1007/s00382-008-0487-2.
59. Yang, G.-Y., and, J. Slingo, (2001), The diurnal cycle in the tropics, Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 784-801. (Pubitemid 32511927)
60. Yokohata, T., et al. (2008), Comparison of equilibrium and transient responses to CO2 increase in eight state-of-the-art climate models, Tellus, 60A, 946-961.
61. Yukimoto, S., et al. (2011), Meteorological Research Institute-Earth System Model Version 1 (MRI-ESM1): Model Description, Technical Report #64, Meteorological Research Institute, Tsukuba-city, Ibaraki 305-0052, Japan, 96 pp.
62. Zelinka, M. D., S. A. Klein, and, D. L. Hartmann, (2012), Computing and partitioning cloud feedbacks using cloud property histograms. Part I: Cloud radiative kernels, J. Clim., 25, 3715-3735.
63. Zhang, M. H., et al. (2005), Comparing clouds and their seasonal variations in 10 atmospheric general circulation models with satellite measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D15S02, doi:10.1029/2004JD005021.