Factors affecting corporate social responsibility: An empirical study

Systems Research and Behavioral Science

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 495-505

  Kalyar, Masood Nawaz ^a   Rafi, Nosheen ^b   Kalyar, Awais Nawaz ^c  

^a GOVERNMENT COLLEGE UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF MODERN LANGUAGES   (Pakistan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Hierarchical regression; Humanistic culture; Strategic planning

Indexed keywords

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES (CSR); EMPIRICAL STUDIES; HIERARCHICAL REGRESSION; PAKISTAN; RESPONSE RATE; SOUTH ASIA;

INDUSTRY;

STRATEGIC PLANNING;

EID: 84880177263     PISSN: 10927026     EISSN: 10991743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sres.2134     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CA, Ganapathi J. 2007. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multi-level theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review 42: 836-863.
2. Aguilera RV, Williams CA, Conley JM, Rupp DE. 2006. Corporate governance and social responsibility: a comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review 14: 147-158.
3. Allaire Y, Firsirotu ME. 1984. Theories of organizational culture. Organization Studies 5: 193-226.
4. Andersen TJ. 2000. Strategic planning, autonomous actions and corporate performance. Long Range Planning 33: 184-200.
5. Beltratti A. 2005. The Complementarity between Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice 30: 373-386.
6. Boyd BK. 1991. Strategic planning and financial performance: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Management Studies 28: 353-374.
7. Burke L, Logsdon JM. 1996. How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning 29: 495-502.
8. Cambell JL. 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 32: 946-967.
9. Carroll AB, Hoy F. 1984. Integrating corporate social policy into strategic management. Journal of Business Strategy 4: 48-57.
10. Clarkson MBE. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review 20: 92-117.
11. Cooke RA, Lafferty JC. 1994. Organizational Culture Inventory. Human Synergistics: Plymouth, MI.
12. Cooke RA, Rousseau DM. 1988. Behavioral norms and expectations: a quantitative approach to the assessment of organizational culture. Group & Organization Studies 13: 245-273.
13. Covin JG, Miles MP. 2007. Strategic use of corporate venturing. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 31: 183-207.
14. Dahlsrud A. 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15: 1-13.
15. Devenish P, Fisher T. 2000. Is strategic planning worth the effort? A study of firm performance versus planning comprehensiveness in Australia. Journal of Management & Organization 6: 1-13.
16. Fineman S, Clarke K. 1996. Green stakeholders: industry interpretations and response. Journal of Management Studies 33: 715-730.
17. Frederick WC. 1994. From CSR1 to CSR2. Business & Society 33: 150-164.
18. Galbreath J. 2010. Drivers of corporate social responsibility: the role of formal strategic planning and firm culture. British Journal of Management 21: 511-525.
19. Hair-Jr JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. 1995. Multivariate Data Analysis: With Readings. Prentice-Hall, Inc.: London.
20. Herndon NC, Fraedrich JP, Yeh QJ. 2001. An investigation of moral values and the ethical content of the corporate culture: Taiwanese versus US sales people. Journal of Business Ethics 30: 73-85.
21. Hg M. 2007. An essay on social responsibility and the limits of the corporate form: a perspective on environmental protection. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice 17: 115-139.
22. Isabella LA, Waddock SA. 1994. Top management team certainty: environmental assessments, teamwork, and performance implications. Journal of Management 20: 835-858.
23. Jamali D, Safieddine AM, Rabbath M. 2008. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review 16: 443-459.
24. Kalyar MN, Chaudhry MS, Rafi N, Kalyar AN. 2011. Effects of self-leadership, knowledge management and culture on creativity. European Journal of Business and Management 3: 1-11.
25. Luke B, Verreynne ML. 2006. Exploring strategic entrepreneurship in the public sector. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 3: 4-26.
26. Maignan I, Ferrell O. 2000. Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: the case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics 23: 283-297.
27. Maignan I, Ralston DA. 2002. Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: insights from businesses self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies 33: 497-514.
28. Margolis JD, Walsh JP. 2003. Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 268-305.
29. Marsiglia E, Falautano I. 2005. Corporate social responsibility and sustainability challenges for a Bancassurance Company. The Geneva Papers 30: 485-497.
30. McKiernan P, Morris C. 1994. Strategic planning and financial performance in UK SMEs: does formality matter? British Journal of Management 5: S31-S41.
31. McWilliams A, Siegel D. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review 26: 117-127.
32. McWilliams A, Siegel DS, Wright PM. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies 43: 1-18.
33. Miles MP, Munilla LS, Darroch J. 2006. The role of strategic conversations with stakeholders in the formation of corporate social responsibility strategy. Journal of Business Ethics 69: 195-205.
34. Mintzberg H. 1994. The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harvard Business Review 72: 107-107.
35. O'Shannassy T. 2003. Modern strategic management: balancing strategic thinking and strategic planning for internal and external stakeholders. Singapore Management Review 25: 53-67.
36. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff P. 2003. Common method bias in behavioural research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 879-903.
37. Ramanujam V, Venkatraman N. 1987. Planning and performance: a new look at an old question. Business Horizons 30: 19-25.
38. Ramanujam V, Venkatraman N, Camillus JC. 1986. Multi-objective assessment of effectiveness of strategic planning: a discriminant analysis approach. Academy of Management Journal 29: 347-372.
39. Rowley T, Berman S. 2000. A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business & Society 39: 397-418.
40. Simons TL, Ingram P. 1997. Organization and ideology: kibbutzim and hired labour, 1951-1965. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 784-813.
41. Sinclair A. 1993. Approaches to organisational culture and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 12: 63-73.
42. Slater SF, Olson EM, Hult GTM. 2006. The moderating influence of strategic orientation on the strategy formation capability-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal 27: 1221-1231.
43. Snow CC, Hrebiniak LG. 1980. Strategy, distinctive competence, and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 317-336.
44. Verreynne ML. 2006. Strategy-making process and firm performance in small firms. Journal of Management & Organization 12: 209-222.
45. Waddock SA, Bodwell C, Graves SB. 2002. Responsibility: the new business imperative. The Academy of Management Executive 16: 132-148.
46. Wood DJ. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review 16: 691-719.