A comparison of computer-aided detection (CAD) effectiveness in pulmonary nodule identification using different methods of bone suppression in chest radiographs

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 651-656

  Novak, Ronald D ^a,b   Novak, Nicholas J ^c   Gilkeson, Robert ^a,b   Mansoori, Bahar ^b   Aandal, Gunhild E ^b  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

^c CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer aided detection; Digital chest radiography; Dual energy subtraction; Image analysis method; Pulmonary nodule

Indexed keywords

CHEST RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; DUAL-ENERGY SUBTRACTION; IMAGE ANALYSIS METHOD; PULMONARY NODULES;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL TESTS;

BONE;

AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LUNG NODULE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES;

AGED; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PILOT PROJECTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULE; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84880174377     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9565-4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kobayashi T, Xu XW, MacMahon H, Metz CE, Doi K: Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. Radiology. 199(3):843-848, 1996
2. Bley TA, Baumann T, Saueressig U, Pache G, Treier M, Schaefer O, et al: Comparison of radiologist and CAD performance in the detection of CT-confirmed subtle pulmonary nodules on digital chest radiographs. Invest Radiol. 43(6):343-348, 2008
3. Kasai S, Li F, Shiraishi J, Doi K: Usefulness of computer-aided diagnosis schemes for vertebral fractures and lung nodules on chest radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 191(1):260-265, 2008
4. Meziane M, Obuchowski NA, Lababede O, Lieber ML, Philips M, Mazzone P: A comparison of follow-up recommendations by chest radiologists, general radiologists, and pulmonologists using computer-aided detection to assess radiographs for actionable pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 196(5):W542-W549, 2011
5. De Boo DW, Uffmann M, Weber M, Bipat S, Boorsma EF, Scheerder MJ, et al: Computer-aided detection of small pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs: an observer study. Acad Radiol 18(12):1507-1514, 2011. LID-10.1016/j.a
6. Eadie LH, Taylor P, Gibson AP: A systematic review of computer-assisted diagnosis in diagnostic cancer imaging. Eur J Radiol. 81(1):e70-e76, 2012
7. Shah PK, Austin JH, White CS, Patel P, Haramati LB, Pearson GD, et al: Missed non-small cell lung cancer: radiographic findings of potentially resectable lesions evident only in retrospect. Radiology. 226(1):235-241, 2003
8. Monnier-Cholley L, Carrat F, Cholley BP, Tubiana JM, Arrive L: Detection of lung cancer on radiographs: receiver operating characteristic analyses of radiologists', pulmonologists', and anesthesiologists' performance. Radiology. 233(3):799-805, 2004
9. Oda S, Awai K, Funama Y, Utsunomiya D, Yanaga Y, Kawanaka K, et al: Effects of dual-energy subtraction chest radiography on detection of small pulmonary nodules with varying attenuation: receiver operating characteristic analysis using a phantom study. Jpn J Radiol. 28(3):214-219, 2010
10. Li F, Hara T, Shiraishi J, Engelmann R, MacMahon H, Doi K: Improved detection of subtle lung nodules by use of chest radiographs with bone suppression imaging: receiver operating characteristic analysis with and without localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 196(5):W535-W541, 2011
11. Balkman JD, Mehandru S, DuPont E, Novak RD, Gilkeson RC: Dual energy subtraction digital radiography improves performance of a next generation computer-aided detection program. J Thorac Imaging. 25(1):41-47, 2010
12. Szucs-Farkas Z, Patak MA, Yuksel-Hatz S, Ruder T, Vock P: Improved detection of pulmonary nodules on energy-subtracted chest radiographs with a commercial computer-aided diagnosis software: comparison with human observers. Eur Radiol. 20(6):1289-1296, 2010
13. Freedman MT, Lo SC, Seibel JC, Bromley CM: Lung nodules: improved detection with software that suppresses the rib and clavicle on chest radiographs. Radiology. 260(1):265-273, 2011
14. Meziane M, Mazzone P, Novak E, Lieber ML, Lababede O, Phillips M, et al: A comparison of four versions of a computer-aided detection system for pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs. J Thorac Imaging. 27(1):58-64, 2012
15. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. The Measurement of Interrater Agreement. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2003. p. 598-626. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471445428. ch18
16. Kuhlman JE, Collins J, Brooks GN, Yandow DR, Broderick LS: Dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: what to look for beyond calcified nodules. Radiographics. 26(1):79-92, 2006
17. Gilkeson RC, Novak RD, Sachs P: Digital radiography with dual-energy subtraction: improved evaluation of cardiac calcification. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 183(5):1233-1238, 2004
18. Mafi JN, Fei B, Roble S, Dota A, Katrapati P, Bezerra HG, et al: Assessment of coronary artery calcium using dual-energy subtraction digital radiography. J Digit Imaging. 25(1):129-136, 2012
19. Zompatori M, Mascalchi M, Ciccarese F, Sverzellati N, Pastorino U: Screening for lung cancer using low-dose spiral CT: 10 years later, state of the art. Radiol Med. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10278-012-9565-4
20. Greenberg AK, Lu F, Goldberg JD, Eylers E, Tsay JC, Yie TA, et al: CT scan screening for lung cancer: risk factors for nodules and malignancy in a high-risk urban cohort. PLoS One 7(7):e39403, 2012