Dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: What to look for Beyond calcified nodules

Radiographics

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 79-92

  Kuhlman, Janet E ^a   Collins, Jannette ^a   Brooks, Gregory N ^a   Yandow, Donald R ^a   Broderick, Lynn S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALCINOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG DISEASE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CALCINOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY, DUAL-ENERGY SCANNED PROJECTION; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC;

EID: 32544454191     PISSN: 15271323     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.261055034     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Krupinski EA. Digital radiographic image presentation and display. In: Samei E, Flynn MJ, eds. RSNA categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics: advances in digital radiography. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2003; 79-89.
2. Dobbins JT, Warp RJ. Dual-energy methods for tissue discrimination in chest radiography. In: Samei E, Flynn MJ, eds. RSNA categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics: advances in digital radiography. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2003; 173-179.
3. Kamimura R, Takashima T. Clinical application of single dual-energy subtraction technique with digital storage-phosphor radiography. J Digit Imaging 1995;8:21-24.
4. MacMahon H. Dual-energy and temporal subtraction digital chest radiography. In: Samei E, Flynn MJ, eds. RSNA categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics: advances in digital radiography. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2003; 181-188.
5. Fischbach F, Freund T, Röttgen R, Engert U, Felix R, Ricke J. Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181:1519-1524.
6. Kelcz F, Zink FE, Peppier WW, Kruger DG, Ergun DL, Mistretta CA. Conventional chest radiography versus dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:271-278.
7. MacMahon H. Improvement in detection of pulmonary nodules: digital image processing and computer-aided diagnosis. RadioGraphics 2000; 20:1169-1177.
8. Hartman TE. Dual-energy radiography. Semin Roentgenol 1997;32:45-49.
9. Kido S, Ikezoe J, Naito H, et al. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with an iterative noise-reduction algorithm. Radiology 1995;194:407-412.
10. MacMahon H, Cannon W, Engelmann RM, Carlin M. Dual-energy subtraction computed chest radiography: comparison of diagnostic accuracy with conventional computed radiography [abstract]. Radiology 1998;209(P):544.
11. Ho JT, Kruger RA. Comparison of dual-energy and conventional chest radiography for nodule detection. Invest Radiol 1989;24:861-868.
12. Ishigaki T, Sakuma S, Ikeda M. One-shot dual-energy subtraction chest imaging with computed radiography: clinical evaluation of film images. Radiology 1988;168:67-72.