Towards benchmarking of domestic robotic assistants

Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics

Volumn 14, Issue , 2005, Pages 403-414

  Iossifidis, I ^a   Lawitzky, G ^b   Knoop, S ^c   Zollner R ^c  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLACK BOXES; EVALUATION CRITERIA; REPRODUCIBLE TESTS; ROBOT SYSTEM; ROBOTIC ASSISTANTS; SERVICE ROBOTICS;

BENCHMARKING; SPECIFICATIONS;

TESTING;

EID: 84880157435     PISSN: 16107438     EISSN: 1610742X     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. J. L. Barron, D. J. Fleet, and S Beauchemin, Performance of optical flow techniques, International Journal of Computer Vision 12 (1984), no. 1, 43-77.
2. V. Blanz, B. Schölkopf, H. Büthoff, V. Burges, C. Vapnik, and T. Vetter, Comparison of view-based object recognition algorithms using realistic 3d models, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1112, Springer-Verlag, 1998.
3. K. Collins, A. M. Plamer, and K. Rathmill, The development of a european benchmark for the comparison of assembly robot programming systems, Proceedings of Robots Europe Conference (Brussels), SpringerVerlag, June 1984.
4. J.-S. Gutmann, W. Burgard, and K. Fox, D. Konolige, An experimental comparison of localization methods, Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 1998.
5. Erwin Prassler, M Hägele, and R. Siegwart, International contest for cleaning robots: Fun event or a first step towards benchmarking service robots, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Field and Service Robotics (FSR), 2003.