Author misconduct: What journal editors do when they suspect and find it?

Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 453-456

  Yadav, Savita ^a   De, Dipankar ^a  

^a POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITOR; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 84880144888     PISSN: 03786323     EISSN: 09733922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.113070     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Public Health Service policies on research misconduct. Final rule. Fed Regist 2005;70: 28369-400.
2. Steen RG. Retractions in the scientific literature: Is the incidence of research fraud increasing? J Med Ethics 2011;37: 249-53.
3. Wager E, Williams P. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008. J Med Ethics 2011;37: 567-70.
4. Titus SL, Wells JA, Rhoades LJ. Repairing research integrity. Nature 2008;453: 980-2.
5. ICMJE-International Committee of Medical Journal Editors-Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Ethical Considerations in the Conduct and Reporting of Research: Editorship, Available from: http://www.icmje.org/ethical-2editor.html.[Last accessed date 2012 Nov 26].
6. Kassirer JP, Angell M. Redundant publication: A reminder. N Engl J Med 1995;333: 449-50.
7. COPE committee on publication ethics-Flow charts. Available from: http://www.publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts. [Last accessed 2012 Nov 27 2012].
8. Goldenring JR. Perspective: Innocence and due diligence: Managing unfounded allegations of scientific misconduct. Acad Med 2010;85: 527-30.
9. Department of Health and Human Services. Public health service standards for the protection of research misconduct whistleblowers. 42 CFR Part 94. 65 Fed Reg 70830 and 65 Fed Reg 82972.
10. COPE committee on publication ethics-Retraction guidelines. Available from: http://www.publicationethics.org/files/retraction guidelines.pdf.[Last accessed 2012 Nov 27].
11. Steen RG. Retractions in the scientific literature: Do authors deliberately commit research fraud? J Med Ethics 2011;37: 113-7.
12. Kornfeld DS. Perspective: Research misconduct: The search for a remedy. Acad Med 2012;87: 877-82.
13. Wright DE, Titus SL, Cornelison JB. Mentoring and research misconduct: An analysis of research mentoring in closed ORI cases. Sci Eng Ethics 2008;14: 323-36.
14. Hall PA, Wixon J, Poulsom R. The Journal of Pathology's approach to publication ethics and misconduct. J Pathol 2011;223: 447-9.