The dimension of time: Historiography in information systems research

Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 1-10

  Bannister, Frank ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Historiography; History; Information systems; Interpretive research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880142559     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alvesson M. and Sköldberg, K(2000) Reflexive Methodology. Sage publications. London.
2. Avison DE, Baskerville R and Myers M (2001) Controlling action research projects. Information Technology and People. Vol. 14. No. 1. pp28-45.
3. Avison, D.E., Lau, F., Myers, M., Nielsen, P.A. (1999), Action Research. Communications of the ACM. January 1999.Vol.42.No.1.pp 94-97.
4. Baskerville, R.L.and Wood-Harper, A.T. (1996), A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology. Vol.11.p 235-246.
5. Baskerville, R.L.and Wood-Harper, A.T. (1998), Diversity in information systems action research methods. European Journal of Information Systems.
6. Bourdieu P and Wacquant LJD (1992) An invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge:Polity Press.
7. Calás M and Smircich L (1992) Rewriting gender into organisational theorising: directions from feminist perspectives. In M Reed and M Hughes (eds), Re-thinking Organisation: new directions in Organisational Theory and Analysis. London:Sage.
8. Checkland, P.(1981), Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley. Chichester.
9. Checkland P (1991) From framework through experience to learning: the essential nature of action research in Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions (Nissen, H E., Klein, H.K and Hirschheim, R (eds) North Holland, Amsterdam) p397- 403.
10. Checkland, P. and Scholes J.(1990), Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, Chichester.
11. Checkland, P. and Holwell, S.(1998a), Information, Systems and Information Systems: making sense of the field. Wiley, Chichester.
12. Checkland, P. and Holwell, S.(1998b), Action Research: Its Nature and Validity.
13. Systemic Practice and Action Research. Vol.11. No.1. p9-21.
14. Chiasson M and Dexter AS (2001) Systems development conflict during the use of an information systems prototyping method of action research: implications for practice and research. Information Technology and People. Vol. 14. No. 1. pp91-108.
15. Clark, P (1972) Action Research and Organisational Change. Harper and Row. London.
16. Coghlan D and Brannick T (2001) Doing Action Research in your own organisation. Sage Publications. London
17. Dash, D.P. (1999) Current Debates in Action Research. Systemic Practice and Action Research. Vol.12. No.5. October. 1999.
18. Davison, R and Vogel D (2000) Group Support systems in Hong Kong: an action research project. Information Systems Journal.10.p3-20.
19. Flood, R.L. and Romm, N.R.A. (1996), Emancipatory Practice: Some contributions from Social Theory and Practice. Systems Practice, 9, 2. p.113- 128.
20. Gherardi, S and Turner, B (1987) Real men don't collect soft data. Quaderno 13. Dipartmento di Politica Sociale.Universita di Trento.
21. Jaggar, AM (1989) Love and Knowledge. Inquiry. Vol.32. pp 51-176.
22. Jonsson, S. (1991) ,'Action Research' in Nissen H E, Klein H K, Hirschheim R (eds). Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions.1991. Elsevier Science Publishers. North Holland.p371-396.
23. Kemmis S and McTaggert, R (1990) The Action Research Planner. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
24. Lander, R and Adam A (1997) We'll teach you to go into computing, in: Women in Computing. Lander,R and Adam A (eds),p113-123. Intellect. Exeter.
25. Lau, F.A. (1997), Review of action research in information systems studies in Information Systems and Qualitative Research. eds. Lee, A., Liebenau, J., DeGross , J. Chapman and Hall. London. UK. p 31-68.
26. Lau, F.A (1999) Towards a framework for action research in information studies. Information Technology and People. Vol. 12, No.2. p148-175.
27. Maranhão T (1991) Reflection, dialogue, and the subject. In F Steier (ed). Research and Reflexivity. London Sage.
28. Mavin, S. (2001) Life through a gender lens: Identities and place. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of Northumbria at Newcastle.
29. McKernan, J (1991) Curriculum Action research. A handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner. London. Cogan Page.
30. Miller, N (1994) Participatory action research: principles, politics and possibilities, in A. Brooks and KE Watkins, The Emerging Power of Action Inquiry Technologies. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass.
31. Moggridge, A. and Reason, P. (1996), Human Inquiry: Steps Towards Emancipatory Practice. Systems Practice, Vol. 9, No. 2. p.159-175.
32. Mumford, E. (2001) Advise for an action researcher. Information Technology and People. Vol. 14. No. 1. pp91-108.
33. Rapoport, R. N. (1970), Three Dilemmas in Action Research: With Special Reference to the Tavistock Experience. Human Relations, 23, 6. p.499-513.
34. Reason, P. (1994), Three Approaches to Participative Inquiry. In Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
35. Reason, P. (2001) Learning and change through Action Research. In J Henry (ed). Creative Management. London. Sage.
36. Reason, P. and Bradbury, H (2000) Handbook of Action Research. Thousand Oaks. CA. Sage.
37. Robertson, M, Newell S, Swan J, Mathiassen L, Bjerknes G (2001) The issue of gender within computing: reflections from the UK and Scandinavia. Information Systems Journal,11. p111-126.
38. Sköldberg, K (1998) Heidegger and organisation. Notes towards a new research program. Scandinavian Journal of Management. Vol.14 (1/2).pp 77-102.
39. Stringer, E. T.(1999), Action Research. 2nd Edition. Sage Publications.
40. Stowell F and West D (1994) Client-led Design. McGraw-Hill. London.
41. Susman, G. and Evered, R. (1978,) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 23. p 582-603.
42. Wainwright DW (2000) Consultancy, Learning and Research: The On-going debate over rigour versus relevance in Information Systems Research. 10th Annual BIT Conference. November 1st -2nd , 2000.
43. Waring, T S (2000) The Systems Analyst and Emancipatory Practice: An exploratory study in three NHS Hospitals. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Northumbria. 2000.
44. Warren, CAB and Hackney, JK (2000) Gender Issues in Ethnography. Sage Publications.
45. Wilson F (1997) Computing, computer science, and computer scientists: how they are perceived. In: Women in Computing, Lander, R and Adam,A (eds),pp149-162.