Fixing research subjects protection in the United States: Moving beyond consent

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Volumn 88, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 428-430

  Koenig, Barbara A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RESEARCH SUBJECT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SOCIAL ASPECT; UNITED STATES; VOLUNTEER; ANXIETY; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); FEMALE; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PATIENT SELECTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ANXIETY; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; PATIENT SELECTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 84880141069     PISSN: 00256196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.03.010     Document Type: Editorial

References (13)

1. Henderson GE. Is informed consent broken? Am J Med Sci. 2011;342(4):267-272.
2. Emanuel EJ, Menikoff J. Reforming the regulations governing research with human subjects. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(12): 1145-1150.
3. Abbott L, Grady C. A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: what we know and what we still need to learn. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011;6(1):3-19.
4. Yarborough MA. Increasing enrollment in drug trials: the need for greater transparency about the social value of research in recruitment efforts. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88(5):442-445.
5. Chludzinski A, Irani C, Mascha EJ, Kurz A, Devereaux PJ, Sessler DI. Protocol understanding and anxiety in perioperative clinical trial patients approached for consent on the day of surgery. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88(5):446-454.
6. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. Moral science: protecting participants in human subjects research. http://bioethics.gov/cms/sites/default/files/Moral%20Science%20June%202012.pdf. Published December 2011. Updated June 2012. Accessed March 18, 2013.
7. Stark L. Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and the Making of Ethical Research. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 2012.
8. Griffin JM, Struve JK, Collins D, Liu A, Nelson DB, Bloomfield HE. Long term clinical trials: how much information do participants retain from the informed consent process? Contemp Clin Trials. 2006;27(5):441-448. (Pubitemid 44189276)
9. Fisher JA. Medical Research for Hire: The Political Economy of Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials. Hoboken, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2009.
10. Petryna A. When Experiments Travel: Clinical Trials and the Global Search for Human Subjects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2009.
11. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. US Department of Health and Human Services website. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont. html. Published April 18, 1979. Accessed March 18, 2013.
12. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects ('Common Rule'). US Department of Health and Human Services website. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/ humansubjects/commonrule/index.html. Accessed March 18, 2013.
13. Basken P. Federal overhaul of rules for human research hits impasse. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/Overhaul-of-Rules- for-Human/137811/. AccessedMarch 7, 2013.