Protocol understanding and anxiety in perioperative clinical trial patients approached for consent on the day of surgery

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Volumn 88, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 446-454

  Chludzinski, Alexandra ^a   Irani, Crissy ^a   Mascha, Edward J ^a   Kurz, Andrea ^a   Devereaux, P J ^b   Sessler, Daniel I ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; CLONIDINE; PLACEBO;

AGED; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL PATIENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COMPREHENSION; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STATISTICS; TIME;

AGED; ANXIETY; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; TIME FACTORS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84880162811     PISSN: 00256196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.12.014     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Protection of human subjects; Belmont Report: notice of report for public comment. Fed Regist. 1979;44(76):23191-23197.
2. Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of extendedrelease metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9627):1839-1847.
3. Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Report. 2009;28(11): 1-25.
4. Marteau TM, Bekker H. The development of a six-item shortform of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol. 1992;31(pt 3):301-306.
5. McCarthy FP, Khashan AS, North RA, et al. A prospective cohort study investigating associations between hyperemesis gravidarum and cognitive, behavioural and emotional wellbeing in pregnancy. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27678.
6. van den Bergh K, Essink-Bot M, van Klaveren R, de Koning H. Informed decision making does not affect health-related quality of life in lung cancer screening (NELSON trial). Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(18):3300-3306.
7. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A. Presenting research risks and benefits to parents. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(3):718-723.
8. Sessler DI, Sigl JC, Manberg PJ, Kelley SD, Schubert A, Chamoun NG. Broadly applicable risk stratification system for predicting duration of hospitalization and mortality. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(5):1026-1037.
9. Wilson EB. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 1927;22(158):209-212.
10. Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensityscore matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28(25):3083-3107.
11. Berger R. Multiparameter hypothesis testing and acceptance sampling. Technometrics. 1982;24(4):295-300.
12. Mascha EJ, Turan A. Joint hypothesis testing and gatekeeping procedures for studies with multiple endpoints. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(6):1304-1317.
13. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S. Do they understand? (part I): parental consent for children participating in clinical anesthesia and surgery research. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(3):603-608. (Pubitemid 36262584)
14. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A. The effect of format on parents' understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: a comparison between text, tables, and graphics. J Health Commun. 2010;15(5):487-501.
15. Miller CK, O'Donnell DC, Searight HR, Barbarash RA. The Deaconess Informed Consent Comprehension Test: an assessment tool for clinical research subjects. Pharmacotherapy. 1996; 16(5):872-878. (Pubitemid 26322190)
16. Treschan TA, Scheck T, Kober A, et al. The influence of protocol pain and risk on patients' willingness to consent for clinical studies: a randomized trial. Anesth Analg. 2003;96(2):498-506. (Pubitemid 36125772)
17. Goldberger JJ, Kruse J, Kadish AH, Passman R, Bergner DW. Effect of informed consent format on patient anxiety, knowledge, and satisfaction. Am Heart J. 2011;162(4):780-785.e1.
18. Myles PS, Fletcher HE, Cairo S, et al. Randomized trial of informed consent and recruitment for clinical trials in the immediate preoperative period. Anesthesiology. 1999;91(4): 969-978. (Pubitemid 29466531)
19. Aaronson NK, Visser-Pol E, Leenhouts GH, et al. Telephonebased nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(3):984-996. (Pubitemid 26085547)
20. Kass NE, Sugarman J, Faden R, Schoch-Spana M. Trust, the fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research. Hastings Cent Rep. 1996;26(5):25-29.