Valuing preferences over stormwater management outcomes including improved hydrologic function

Water Resources Research

Volumn 49, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 4114-4125

  Londoño Cadavid, Catalina ^a,b   Ando, Amy W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD EIA   (Colombia)

Author keywords

aquatic habitat; choice experiment; LID; stormwater management; values; water quality

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEMS; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; FLOODS; GROUNDWATER; INVESTMENTS; RIVER POLLUTION; RUNOFF; STORM SEWERS; SURVEYS; WATER QUALITY;

AQUATIC HABITATS; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS; HYDROLOGIC FUNCTION; LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT; STORM-WATER MANAGEMENTS; VALUES;

STORMS;

EID: 84880108281     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: 19447973     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wrcr.20317     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adamowicz, W., P. Boxall, M. Williams, and, J. Louviere, (1998), Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 80 (1), 64-75. (Pubitemid 128432280)
2. Alriksson, S., and, T. Öberg, (2008), Conjoint analysis for environmental evaluation, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 15 (3), 244-257, doi: 10.1065/espr2008.02.479.
3. Bateman, I., M. Cole, S. Georgiou, and, D. Hadley, (2006), Comparing contingent valuation and contingent ranking: A case study considering the benefits of urban river water quality improvements, J. Environ. Manage., 79 (3), 221-231, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.010.
4. Bayer, P., and, C. Timmins, (2005), On the equilibrium properties of locational sorting models, J. Urban Econ., 57 (3), 462-477, doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2004.12.008. (Pubitemid 40526176)
5. Bin, O., and, S. Polasky, (2004), Effects of flood hazards on property values: Evidence before and after Hurricane Floyd, Land Econ., 80 (4), 490-500, doi: 10.3368/le.80.4.490. (Pubitemid 39594380)
6. Birol, E., K. Karousakis, and, P. Koundouri, (2006), Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: A survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application, Sci. Total Environ., 365 (1-3), 105-122, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.032. (Pubitemid 44183824)
7. Brabec, E. A., (2009), Imperviousness and land-use policy: Toward an effective approach to watershed planning, J. Hydrol. Eng., 14 (4), 425-433, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(425).
8. Braden, J. B., and, A. W. Ando, (2011), Economic costs, benefits, and achievability of low-impact development based stormwater regulations, in Economic Incentives for Stormwater Control, edited by, H. W. Thurston, p. 256, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
9. Cameron, T. A., W. D. Shaw, S. E. Ragland, J. Mac Callaway, and, S. Keefe, (1996), Using actual and contingent behavior data with differing levels of time aggregation to model recreation demand, J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 21 (1), 130-149, doi: 10.2307/40986903. (Pubitemid 126488017)
10. Carson, R. T., and, R. C. Mitchell, (1993), The value of clean water: The public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water, Water Resour. Res., 29 (7), 2445-2454, doi: 10.1029/93WR00495.
11. Clark Dietz, Inc. (2009), John Street Watershed Master Plan-Draft Report, City of Champaign, Champaign, Ill.
12. Clark, D. E., V. Novotny, R. Griffin, D. Booth, A. Bartoš ová, M. C. Daun, and, M. Hutchinson, (2002), Willingness to pay for flood and ecological risk reduction in an urban watershed, Water Sci. Technol., 45 (9), 235-242. (Pubitemid 34618563)
13. De Leeuw, E., and, W. de Heer, (2002), Trends in household survey nonresponse: A longitudinal and international comparison, in Survey Nonresponse, edited by, R. M. Groves, et al., pp. 41-54, John Wiley, New York.
14. Dietz, M. E., J. C. Clausen, and, K. K. Filchak, (2004), Education and changes in residential nonpoint source pollution, Environ. Manage., 34 (5), 684-690, doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-0238-4. (Pubitemid 41057789)
15. Englin, J., and, T. A. Cameron, (1996), Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data, Environ. Resour. Econ., 7 (2), 133-147, doi: 10.1007/BF00699288.
16. Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (1990), Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices, Natl. Tech. Inf. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Commer., Springfield, Va.
17. FitzHugh, T., (2001), Watershed Characteristics and Aquatic Ecological Integrity: A Literature Review, TNC Freshwater Initiative. Arlington, Va. [Accessed from http://conserveonline.org/library/watershed.pdf/view.html.]
18. Fitzpatrick, F., M. Diebel, M. A. Harris, T. L. Arnold, M. A. Lutz, and, K. D. Richards, (2005), Effects of urbanization on the geomorphology, habitat, hydrology, and fish index of biotic integrity of streams in the Chicago area, Illinois and Wisconsin, Am. Fish. Soc. Sympos., 47, 87-115. (Pubitemid 46101632)
19. Geography Division (2009), Tiger/Line™ Shapefiles. U.S. Census Bureau. [Available at http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/tgrshp2012/usernotes. html].
20. Groves, R. M., (2006), Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys, Public Opin. Q., 70 (5), 646-675, doi: 10.1093/poq/nfl033.
21. Harrison, D. M., G. T. Smersh, and, A. L. Schwartz Jr,. (2001), Environmental determinants of housing prices: The impact of flood zone status, J. Real Estate Res., 21 (1/2), 3-20.
22. Hensher, D., and, W. Greene, (2003), The mixed logit model: The state of practice, Transportation, 30 (2), 133-176. (Pubitemid 36405819)
23. Hindsley, P., C. E. Landry, and, B. Gentner, (2011), Addressing onsite sampling in recreation site choice models, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 62 (1), 95-110, doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2010.10.007.
24. Hole, A. R., (2007), Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood, Stata J., 7 (3), 388-401.
25. Holmes, T. P., and, W. L. Adamowicz, (2003), Attribute-based methods, in A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, edited by, P. A. Champ, K. J. Boyle, and, T. C. Brown, pp. 161-219, Kluwer Acad., Dordrecht, Netherlands.
26. Hoyos, D., (2010), The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments, Ecol. Econ., 69 (8), 1595-1603, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.011.
27. Johnston, R. J., E. Y. Besedin, R. Iovanna, C. J. Miller, R. F. Wardwell, and, M. H. Ranson, (2005), Systematic variation in willingness to pay for aquatic resource improvements and implications for benefit transfer: A meta-analysis, Can. J. Agric. Econ./Rev. Can. d'agroecon., 53 (2-3), 221-248, doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.04018.x. (Pubitemid 41215235)
28. Jorgensen, B. S., and, G. J. Syme, (2000), Protest responses and willingness to pay: Attitude toward paying for stormwater pollution abatement, Ecol. Econ., 33 (2), 251-265, doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00145-7. (Pubitemid 30247443)
29. Kuhfeld, W. F., (2009), Marketing Research Methods in SAS: Experimental Design, Choice, Conjoint, and Graphical Techniques, SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, N. C.
30. Lancaster, K. J., (1966), A new approach to consumer theory, J. Polit. Econ., 74 (2), 132-157.
31. Loomis, J., P. Kent, L. Strange, K. Fausch, and, A. Covich, (2000), Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey, Ecol. Econ., 33, 103-117. (Pubitemid 30184119)
32. Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher, and, J. D. Swait, (2000), Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K.
33. Manski, C. F., and, S. R. Lerman, (1977), The estimation of choice probabilities from choice based samples, Econometrica, 45 (8), 1977-1988, doi: 10.2307/1914121.
34. McFadden, D., and, K. Train, (2000), Mixed MNL models for discrete response, J. Appl. Econ., 15 (5), 447-470.
35. Meyerhoff, J., U. Liebe, and, V. Hartje, (2009), Benefits of biodiversity enhancement of nature-oriented silviculture: Evidence from two choice experiments in Germany, J. For. Econ., 15 (1-2), 37-58, doi: 10.1016/j.jfe.2008.03.003.
36. Moore, R., B. Provencher, and, R. C. Bishop, (2011), Valuing a spatially variable environmental resource: Reducing non-point-source pollution in Green Bay, Wisconsin, Land Econ., 87 (1), 45-59.
37. National Research Council (2009), Urban Stormwater Management in the United States, Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, D. C.
38. Novotny, V., D. Clark, R. Griffin, and, A. Bartosová, (2001), Balancing flood control and ecological preservation/restoration of urban watersheds, in Advances in Urban Stormwater and Agricultural Runoff Source Controls, edited by, J. Maršálek, et al., pp. 39-56, Kluwer Acad., Dordrecht, Netherlands.
39. Pendleton, L., and, R. Mendelsohn, (2000), Estimating recreation preferences using hedonic travel cost and random utility models, Environ. Resour. Econ., 17 (1), 89-108, doi: 10.1023/A:1008374423710.
40. Revelt, D., and, K. Train, (1998), Mixed logit with repeated choices: Households' choices of appliance efficiency level, Rev. Econ. Stat., 80 (4), 647-657, doi: 10.1162/003465398557735. (Pubitemid 128344306)
41. Steele, J., L. Bourke, A. E. Luloff, P.-S. Liao, G. L. Theodori, and, R. S. Krannich, (2001), The drop-off/pick-up method for household survey research, Community Dev., 32 (2), 238-250, doi: 10.1080/15575330109489680.
42. Street, D. J., L. Burgess, and, J. J. Louviere, (2005), Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments, Int. J. Res. Marketing, 22 (4), 459-470, doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2005.09.003. (Pubitemid 43045893)
43. Tait, P., R. Baskaran, R. Cullen, and, K. Bicknell, (2012), Nonmarket valuation of water quality: Addressing spatially heterogeneous preferences using GIS and a random parameter logit model, Ecol. Econ., 75, 15-21, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.009.
44. U.S. Census Bureau (2010), State and County QuickFacts. [Available at http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/index.html].
45. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000), Low impact development (LID): A literature review, EPA Doc. EPA-841-B-00-005. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water. Washington, D. C.
46. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2007), Reducing stormwater costs through low impact development (LID) strategies and practices, EPA Doc. EPA 841-F-07-006. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Nonpoint Source Control Branch. Washington, D. C.
47. Van Houtven, G., J. Powers, and, S. K. Pattanayak, (2007), Valuing water quality improvements in the United States using meta-analysis: Is the glass half-full or half-empty for national policy analysis?, Resour. Energy Econ., 29 (3), 206-228, doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.01.002. (Pubitemid 47315503)
48. Whitehead, J. C., (2006), Improving willingness to pay estimates for quality improvements through joint estimation with quality perceptions, South. Econ. J., 73 (1), 100-111, doi: 10.2307/20111876. (Pubitemid 44214101)
49. Wilson, M. A., and, S. R. Carpenter, (1999), Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971-1997, Ecol. Appl., 9 (3), 772-783. (Pubitemid 29388388)
50. Zhai, G., T. Sato, T. Fukuzono, S. Ikeda, and, K. Yoshida, (2006), Willingness to pay for flood risk reduction and its determinants in Japan, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 42 (4), 927-940, doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006. tb04505.x. (Pubitemid 44870389)
51. Zhai, G., T. Fukuzono, and, S. Ikeda, (2007), Multi-attribute evaluation of flood management in Japan: A choice experiment approach, Water Environ. J., 21 (4), 265-274, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2007.00072.x. (Pubitemid 350142323)
52. Zhang, Y.-K., and, K. E. Schilling, (2006), Increasing streamflow and baseflow in Mississippi River since the 1940's: Effect of land use change, J. Hydrol., 324 (1-4), 412-422, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.033. (Pubitemid 44250967)