States monitoring assisted reproductive technology (SMART) collaborative: Data collection, linkage, dissemination, and use

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 571-577

  Mneimneh, Allison S ^a   Boulet, Sheree L ^a   Sunderam, Saswati ^a   Zhang, Yujia ^a   Jamieson, Denise J ^a   Crawford, Sara ^a   McKane, Patricia ^b   Copeland, Glenn ^b   Mersol Barg, Michael ^c   Grigorescu, Violanda ^a   Cohen, Bruce ^d   Steele, Joann ^e   Sappenfield, William ^f   Diop, Hafsatou ^d   Kirby, Russell S ^f   Kissin, Dmitry M ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH   (United States)

^c Center for Reproductive Medicine and Surgery   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^e FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; BIRTH DEFECT; CANCER RISK; DISEASE REGISTRY; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATERNAL CARE; MONITORING; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PERINATAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP;

ADULT; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; FLORIDA; HEALTH CARE COALITIONS; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MASSACHUSETTS; MICHIGAN; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; STATE HEALTH PLANS;

EID: 84880099067     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: 1931843X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4452     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Chandra A, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, Abma JC, Jones J. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: Data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 23;2005: 1-160.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Assisted Reproductive Technology. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Health and Human Services. Available at: www.cdc.gov/art. Accessed 6/21/13.
3. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy: an American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012;97: 825-834.
4. Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, Rebar RW, Tasca RJ. Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109: 967-977.
5. Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2012;18: 485-503.
6. Wen J, Jiang J, Ding C, et al. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2012;97:1331-1337. e1331-1334.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance-United States, 2009. MMWR 2012;61(SS7);1-23.
8. Sunderam S, Schieve LA, Cohen B, et al. Linking birth and infant death records with assisted reproductive technology data: Massachusetts, 1997-1998. Matern Child Health J 2006;10: 115-125.
9. Zhang Y, Cohen B, Macaluso M, Zhang Z, Durant T, Nannini A. Probabilistic linkage of assisted reproductive technology information with vital records, Massachusetts 1997-2000. Matern Child Health J 2012;16: 1703-1708.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Registry plus -Software programs for cancer registries. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2010. Available at: www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/tools/ registryplus Accessed 3/12/2013.
11. McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, et al. High gestational weight gain and the risk of preterm birth and low birth weight: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JObstet Gynaecol Can 2011;33: 1223-1233.
12. Pinborg A, Henningsen AK, Malchau SS, Loft A. Congenital anomalies after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2013;99: 327-332.
13. Schieve LA, Cohen B, Nannini A, et al. A population-based study of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology in Massachusetts. Matern Child Health J 2007;11: 517-525.
14. Boulet SL, Schieve LA, Nannini A, et al. Perinatal outcomes of twin births conceived using assisted reproduction technology: A population-based study. Hum Reprod 2008;23: 1941-1948.
15. McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Beyene J, Knowledge Synthesis Group. Overweight and obesity in mothers and risk of preterm birth and low birth weight infants: Systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ 2010;341:c3428.
16. Sauber-Schatz EK, Sappenfield W, Grigorescu V, et al. Obesity, assisted reproductive technology, and early preterm birth-Florida, 2004-2006. American J Epidemiol 2012; 176: 886-896.
17. Wellons MF, Fujimoto VY, Baker VL, et al. Race matters: A systematic review of racial/ethnic disparity in Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology reported outcomes. Fertil Steril 2012;98: 406-409.
18. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, de Klerk N, Bower C. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19: 330-353.
19. Belva F, Henriet S, Van den Abbeel E, et al. Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles. Hum Reprod 2008;23: 2227-2238.
20. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. New Engl J Med 2012;366: 1803-1813.
21. Zhu JL, Basso O, Obel C, Bille C, Olsen J. Infertility, infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish national birth cohort. BMJ 2006;333:679.
22. Brinton LA, Trabert B, Shalev V, Lunenfeld E, Sella T, Chodick G. In vitro fertilization and risk of breast and gynecologic cancers: A retrospective cohort study within the Israeli Maccabi Healthcare Services. Fertil Steril 2013;99: 1189-1196.
23. Calderon-Margalit R, Friedlander Y, Yanetz R, et al. Cancer risk after exposure to treatments for ovulation induction. Am J Epidemiol 2009;169: 365-375.
24. Jensen A, Sharif H, Kjaer SK. Use of fertility drugs and risk of uterine cancer: Results from a large Danish populationbased cohort study. American J Epidemiol 2009;170:1408-1414.
25. Stewart LM, Holman CD, Finn JC, Preen DB, Hart R. In vitro fertilization is associated with an increased risk of borderline ovarian tumours. Gynecol Oncol 2013;129: 372-376.
26. Stewart LM, Holman CD, Hart R, Bulsara MK, Preen DB, Finn JC. In vitro fertilization and breast cancer: Is there cause for concern? Fertil Steril 2012;98: 334-340.
27. Yli-Kuha AN, Gissler M, Klemetti R, Luoto R, Hemminki E. Cancer morbidity in a cohort of 9175 Finnish women treated for infertility. Hum Reprod 2012;27: 1149-1155.
28. Finnstrom O, Kallen B, Lindam A, Nilsson E, Nygren KG, Olausson PO. Maternal and child outcome after in vitro fertilization-A review of 25 years of population-based data from Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90: 494-500.
29. Kallen B, Finnstrom O, Lindam A, Nilsson E, Nygren KG, Olausson PO. Cancer risk in children and young adults conceived by in vitro fertilization. Pediatrics 2010;126: 270-276.
30. Petridou ET, Sergentanis TN, Panagopoulou P, et al. In vitro fertilization and risk of childhood leukemia in Greece and Sweden. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012;58: 930-936.
31. Henne MB, Bundorf MK. Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments. Fertil Steril 2008;89: 66-73.
32. Bitler MP, Schmidt L. Utilization of infertility treatments: The effects of insurance mandates. Demography 2012;49: 125-149.
33. Hamilton BH, McManus B. The effects of insurance mandates on choices and outcomes in infertility treatment markets. Health Econ 2012;21: 994-1016.
34. Martin JR, Bromer JG, Sakkas D, Patrizio P. Insurance coverage and in vitro fertilization outcomes: A U.S. perspective. Fertil Steril 2011;95: 964-969.
35. Reynolds MA, Schieve LA, Jeng G, Peterson HB. Does insurance coverage decrease the risk for multiple births associated with assisted reproductive technology? Fertil Steril 2003;80: 16-23.
36. Lain SJ, Hadfield RM, Raynes-Greenow CH, et al. Quality of data in perinatal population health databases: A systematic review. Med Care 2012;50:e7-20.
37. Zhang Z, Macaluso M, Cohen B, et al. Accuracy of assisted reproductive technology information on the Massachusetts birth certificate, 1997-2000. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 1657-1661.
38. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Assurance of confidentiality. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: www.cdc.gov/od/science/ integrity/confidentiality Accessed 3/12/2013.
39. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Research data center. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: www.cdc.gov/rdc Accessed 3/12/2013.