Comparison of gaseous oxidized Hg measured by KCl-coated denuders, and nylon and cation exchange membranes

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 47, Issue 13, 2013, Pages 7307-7316

  Huang, Jiaoyan ^a   Miller, Matthieu B ^a   Weiss Penzias, Peter ^b   Gustin, Mae Sexauer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATION EXCHANGE MEMBRANES; COLLECTION EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINANT; GASEOUS OXIDIZED MERCURIES; LABORATORY AND FIELD EXPERIMENTS; NYLON MEMBRANES; SPACE AND TIME; THERMODESORPTION;

POLYAMIDES; RAYON; TEMPERATURE PROGRAMMED DESORPTION; THERMAL DESORPTION;

POSITIVE IONS;

GASEOUS OXIDIZED MERCURY; MERCURY; NYLON; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CALIBRATION; CATION; CHLORIDE; COATING; DESORPTION; ION EXCHANGE; MEMBRANE; MERCURY (ELEMENT); OXIDATION; POLICY MAKING; POLLUTION EFFECT;

AMBIENT AIR; ARTICLE; CATION EXCHANGE; CATION EXCHANGE MEMBRANE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DESORPTION; LABORATORY; MEMBRANE; THERMODESORPTION;

ADSORPTION; AIR POLLUTANTS; BROMIDES; CATION EXCHANGE RESINS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MERCURIC CHLORIDE; MERCURY COMPOUNDS; NYLONS; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; OXIDES; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE;

EID: 84880094196     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es4012349     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Schroeder, W. H.; Munthe, J. Atmospheric mercury-An overview Atmos. Environ. 1998, 32 (5) 809-822
2. Seigneur, C.; Vijayaraghavan, K.; Lohman, K.; Karamchandani, P.; Scott, C. Global source attribution for mercury deposition in the United States Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38 (2) 555-569
3. Lindberg, S. E.; Bullock, R.; Ebinghaus, R.; Engstrom, D.; Feng, X.; Fitzgerald, W.; Pirrone, N.; Prestbo, E.; Seigneur, C. A synthesis of progress and uncertainites in attributing the sources of mercury in deposition AMBIO 2007, 36, 19-32
4. Hynes, A. J.; Donohoue, D. L.; Goodsite, M. E.; Hedgecock, I. M., Our current understanding of major chemical and physical processes affecting mercury dynamics in the atmosphere and at the air-water/terrestrial interfaces. In Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere; Mason, R.; Pirrone, N., Eds. Springer: New York, 2009.
5. Ariya, P. A.; Peterson, K.; Snider, G.; Amyot, M. Mercury chemical transformations in the gas, aqueous and heterogeneous phases: State-of-the-art science and uncertainties. In Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere; Mason, R.; Pirrone, N., Eds. Spring: New York, 2009.
6. Lin, C.-J.; Pongprueksa, P.; Lindberg, S. E.; Pehkonen, S. O.; Byun, D.; Jang, C. Scientific uncertainties in atmospheric mercury models I: Model science evaluation Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40 (16) 2911-2928
7. Subir, M.; Ariya, P. A.; Dastoor, A. P. A review of uncertainties in atmospheric modeling of mercury chemistry I. Uncertainties in existing kinetic parameters: Fundamental limitations and the importance of heterogeneous chemistry Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45 (32) 5664-5676
8. Subir, M.; Ariya, P. A.; Dastoor, A. P. A review of the sources of uncertainties in atmospheric mercury modeling II. Mercury surface and heterogeneous chemistry-A missing link Atmos. Environ. 2012, 46 (0) 1-10
9. Feng, X.; Lu, J. Y.; Grégoire, C. D.; Hao, Y.; Banic, C. M.; Schroeder, W. H. Analysis of inorganic mercury species associated with airborne particulate matter/aerosols: method development Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 380, 683-689
10. 3 and OH in the atmosphere Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39 (18) 3355-3367
11. Lindberg, S. E.; Stratton, W. J. Atmospheric mercury speciation: Concentrations and behavior of reactive gaseous mercury in ambient air Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32 (1) 49-57
12. Seigneur, C.; Abeck, H.; Chia, G.; Reinhard, M.; Bloom, N. S.; Prestbo, E.; Saxena, P. Mercury adsorption to elemental carbon (soot) particles and atmospheric particulate matter Atmos. Environ. 1998, 32, 2649-2657
13. Landis, M. S.; Stevens, R. K.; Schaedlich, F.; Prestbo, E. M. Development and characterization of an annular denuder methodology for the measurement of divalent inorganic reactive gaseous mercury in ambient air Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36 (13) 3000-3009
14. Sheu, G.-R.; Mason, R. P. An examination of methods for the measurements of reactive gaseous mercury in the atmosphere Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35 (6) 1209-1216
15. Schroeder, W.; Yarwood, G.; Niki, H. Transformation processes involving mercury species in the atmosphere-Results from a literature survey Water Air and Soil Pollution 1991, 56, 653-666
16. Wallschläger, D. Speziesanalytische Untersuchungen zur Abschätzung des Remobilisierungspotentials ban Queeksilber aus kontaminierten Elbauen; University of Bremen: Bremen, Germany, 1996.
17. Xiao, Z.; Sommar, J.; Wel, S.; Lindqvist, O. Sampling and determination of gas phase divalent mercury in the air using a KCI coated denuder Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1997, 358, 386-391
18. Feng, X.; Sommar, J.; Gårdfeldt, K.; Lindqvist, O. Improved determination of gaseous divalent mercury in ambient air using KCl coated denuders Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 2000, 366, 423-428
19. Stratton, W. J.; Lindberg, S. E. Use of a refluxing mist chamber for measurement of gas-phase mercury(II) species in the atmosphere Water Air Soil Pollut. 1995, 80 (1-4) 1269-1278
20. Ebinghaus, R.; Jennings, S. G.; Schroeder, W. H.; Berg, T.; Donaghy, T.; Guentzel, J.; Kenny, C.; Kock, H. H.; Kvietkus, K.; Landing, W.; Mühleckleck, T.; Munthe, J.; Prestbo, E. M.; Schneeberger, D.; Slemr, F.; Sommar, J.; Urba, A.; Wallschläger, D.; Xiao, Z. International field intercomparison measurements of atmospheric mercury species at Mace Head, Ireland Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33 (18) 3063-3073
21. Lyman, S. N.; Gustin, M. S.; Prestbo, E. M.; Marsik, F. J. Estimation of dry deposition of atmospheric mercury in Nevada by direct and indirect methods Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41 (6) 1970-1976
22. Lyman, S. N.; Gustin, M. S.; Prestbo, E. M.; Kilner, P. I.; Edgerton, E.; Hartsell, B. Testing and application of surrogate surfaces for understanding potential gaseous oxidized mercury dry deposition Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (16) 6235-6241
23. Lyman, S. N.; Gustin, M. S.; Prestbo, E. M. A passive sampler for ambient gaseous oxidized mercury concentrations Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44 (2) 246-252
24. Huang, J.; Choi, H.-D.; Landis, M. S.; Holsen, T. M. An application of passive samplers to understand atmospheric mercury concentration and dry deposition spatial distributions J. Environ. Monitoring. 2012, 14 (11) 2976-2982
25. Caldwell, C. A.; Swartzendruber, P.; Prestbo, E. Concentration and dry deposition of mercury species in arid south central New Mexico (2001-2002) Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (24) 7535-7540
26. Castro, M. S.; Moore, C.; Sherwell, J.; Brooks, S. B. Dry deposition of gaseous oxidized mercury in Western Maryland Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 417-418 (0) 232-240
27. Lu, J. Y.; Schroeder, W. H.; Berg, T.; Munthe, J.; Schneeberger, D.; Schaedlich, F. A device for sampling and determination of total particulate mercury in ambient air Anal. Chem. 1998, 70 (11) 2403-2408
28. Rutter, A. P.; Schauer, J. J. The impact of aerosol composition on the particle to gas partitioning of reactive mercury Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41 (11) 3934-3939
29. Rutter, A. P.; Schauer, J. J. The effect of temperature on the gas-particle partitioning of reactive mercury in atmospheric aerosols Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41 (38) 8647-8657
30. Lynam, M. M.; Keeler, G. J. Artifacts associated with the measurement of particulate mercury in an urban environment: The influence of elevated ozone concentrations Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39 (17) 3081-3088
31. Ambrose, J. L.; Lyman, S. N.; Huang, J.; Gustin, M.; Jaffe, D. A. Fast time resolution oxidized mercury measurements with the UW detector for oxidized Hg species (DOHGS) during the Reno atmospheric mercury intecomparison experiment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, DOI: 10.1021/es303916v • Publication Date (Web): 20 Feb 2013.
32. Swartzendruber, P. C.; Jaffe, D. A.; Finley, B. Development and first results of an aircraft-based, high time resolution technique for gaseous elemental and reactive (oxidized) gaseous mercury Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (19) 7484-7489
33. Lyman, S. N.; Jaffe, D. A., Formation and fate of oxidized mercury in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. Nat. Geoscience. 2011, advance online publication.
34. Gustin, M. S.; Huang, J.; Miller, M. B.; Peterson, C.; Jaffe, D. A.; Ambrose, J.; Finley, B. D.; Lyman, S. N.; Call, K.; Talbot, R.; Feddersen, D.; Mao, H.; Lindberg, S. E. Do we understand what the mercury speciation instruments are actually measuring? Results of RAMIX Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, DOI: 10.1021/es3039104, Publication Date January 10, 2013 (Article).
35. Peterson, C.; Alishahi, M.; Gustin, M. S. Testing the use of passive sampling systems for understanding air mercury concentrations and dry deposition across Florida, USA Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 424 (0) 297-307
36. Dasgupta, P. K.; McDowell, W. L.; Rhee, J.-S. Porous membrane-based diffusion scrubber for the sampling of atmospheric gases Analyst 1986, 111 (1) 87-90
37. Appel, B. R.; Tokiwa, Y.; Haik, M. Sampling of nitrates in ambient air Atmos. Environ. (1967) 1981, 15 (3) 283-289
38. Appel, B. R.; Wall, S. M.; Tokiwa, Y.; Haik, M. Simultaneous nitric acid, particulate nitrate and acidity measurements in ambient air Atmos. Environ. (1967) 1980, 14 (5) 549-554
39. Marsik, F. J.; Keeler, G. J.; Landis, M. S. The dry-deposition of speciated mercury to the Florida Everglades: Measurements and modeling Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41 (1) 136-149
40. Finley, B. D.; Jaffe, D. A.; Call, K.; Lyman, S. N.; Gustin, M., Development, testing, and deployment of an air sampling manifold for spiking elemental and oxidized mercury during RAMIX. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, DOI: 10.1021/es304185a, Publication Date (Web): 26 Feb 2013.
41. L'Vov, B. V. Kinetics and mechanism of thermal decomposition of mercuric oxide Thermochim. Acta 1999, 333 (1) 21-26
42. Lyman, S. N.; Jaffe, D. A.; Gustin, M. S. Release of mercury halides from KCl denuders in the presence of ozone Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 8197-8204
43. NADP Atmospheric Mercury Network (AMNet) Site Operations Manual. http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/amn/docs/AMNet-Operations-Manual.pdf
44. Aspmo, K.; Gauchard, P.-A.; Steffen, A.; Temme, C.; Berg, T.; Bahlmann, E.; Banic, C.; Dommergue, A.; Ebinghaus, R.; Ferrari, C.; Pirrone, N.; Sprovieri, F.; Wibetoe, G. Measurements of atmospheric mercury species during an international study of mercury depletion events at Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, spring 2003. How reproducible are our present methods? Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39 (39) 7607-7619
45. Lide, D. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2001.
46. Kotz, J. C.; Purcell, K. F. Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity; Sanders College: Philadelphia, 1987.
47. Alyssa, N., Product Applications Specialist, Cole-Parmer. In 2012.
48. Pall Scientific http://www.pall.com/main/OEM-Materials-and-Devices/ Product.page?id=3949
49. Huang, J.; Hopke, P. K.; Choi, H.-D.; Laing, J. R.; Cui, H.; Zananski, T. J.; Chandrasekaran, S. R.; Rattigan, O. V.; Holsen, T. M. Mercury (Hg) emissions from domestic biomass combustion for space heating Chemosphere 2011, 84 (11) 1694-1699
50. Engle, M. A.; Tate, M. T.; Krabbenhoft, D. P.; Kolker, A.; Olson, M. L.; Edgerton, E. S.; DeWild, J. F.; McPherson, A. K. Characterization and cycling of atmospheric mercury along the central US Gulf Coast Appl. Geochem. 2008, 23 (3) 419-437