Dry deposition of gaseous oxidized mercury in Western Maryland

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 417-418, Issue , 2012, Pages 232-240

  Castro, Mark S ^a   Moore, Chris ^b   Sherwell, John ^c   Brooks, Steve B ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE   (United States)

^b DESERT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

^d NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Atmospheric mercury; Dry deposition; Gaseous oxidized mercury

Indexed keywords

AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION; ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY; DRY DEPOSITION; DRY DEPOSITION VELOCITIES; GASEOUS ELEMENTAL MERCURY; HIGHLY-CORRELATED; LITTERFALLS; MARYLAND; MERCURY DEPOSITIONS; OXIDIZED MERCURY; RESISTANCE MODELS; SAMPLING PERIOD; SURROGATE SURFACES; TOTAL MERCURIES; WET DEPOSITION;

DEPOSITION RATES; ION EXCHANGE; MERCURY (METAL);

DEPOSITION;

MERCURY;

ANNUAL VARIATION; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DRY DEPOSITION; ION EXCHANGE; LITTERFALL; MERCURY (ELEMENT); WET DEPOSITION;

AMBIENT AIR; ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DRY DEPOSITION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ION EXCHANGE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEASONAL VARIATION; UNITED STATES; WET DEPOSITION;

AIR POLLUTANTS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GASES; MARYLAND; MERCURY; MERCURY COMPOUNDS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; OXIDES;

MARYLAND; UNITED STATES;

MERCURIALIS ANNUA;

EID: 84857035574     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.044     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Engle M.A., Tate M.T., Krabbenhoft D.P., Kolker A., Olson M.L., Edgerton E.S., et al. Characterization and cycling of atmospheric mercury along the central US Gulf Coast. Appl Geochem 2008, 23:419-437.
2. Engle M.A., Tate M.T., Krabbenhoft D.P., Schauer J.J., Kolker A., Shanley J.B., et al. Comparison of atmospheric mercury speciation and deposition at nine sites across central and eastern North America. J Geophys Res 2010, 115.
3. EPA 2008 Biennial National Listing of Fish Advisories, EPA-823_F-09-007 2009.
4. Gabriel M.C., Williamson D.G., Brooks S., Lindberg S. Atmospheric speciation of mercury in two contrasting Southeastern US airsheds. Atmos Environ 2005, 39:4947-4958.
5. Grigal D.F. Inputs and outputs of mercury from terrestrial watersheds: a review. Environ Rev 2002, 10:1-39.
6. Gustin M., Jaffe D. Reducing the uncertainty in measurement and understanding of mercury in the atmosphere. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44:2222-2227.
7. Lai S.O., Huang J., Hopke P.K., Holsen T.M. An evaluation of direct measurement techniques for mercury dry deposition. Sci Total Environ 2011, 409:1320-1327.
8. Levin Ilan Dirty kilowatts: America's top fifty power plant mercury polluters. Environmental integrity project report 2010, March, Austin, Texas.
9. Lohman K., Seigneur C., Edgerton E., Jansen J. Modeling mercury in power plant plumes. Environ Sci Technol 2006, 40:3848-3854.
10. Lyman S.N., Gustin M.S. Speciation of atmospheric mercury at two sites in northern Nevada, USA. Atmos Environ 2008, 42:927-939.
11. Lyman S.N., Gustin M.S., Prestbo E.M., Kilner P.I., Edgerton E., Hartsell B. Testing and application of surrogate surfaces for understanding potential gaseous oxidized mercury dry deposition. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43:6235-6241.
12. Lyman S.N., Gustin M.S., Prestbo E.M., Marsik F.J. Estimation of dry deposition of atmospheric mercury in Nevada by direct and indirect methods. Environ Sci Technol 2007, 41:1970-1976.
13. Marsik F.J., Keeler G.J., Landis M.S. The dry-deposition of speciated mercury to the Florida Everglades: measurements and modeling. Atmos Environ 2007, 41:136-149.
14. Moore, CW, Castro MS, Brooks SB. Modified Bowen ratio fluxes of gaseous elemental mercury in western Maryland. Atmos Environ In Review.
15. NADP. National Atmospheric Deposition Program 2010 Annual Summary. NADP Data Report 2011-01. Illinois State Water Survey.
16. NADP. National Atmospheric Deposition Program Atmospheric Mercury Network Site Operation Manual 2011-05. Version 1.0. Illinois State Water Survey.
17. Risch M.R., DeWild J.F., Krabbenhoft D.P., Kolka R.K., Zhang L. Litterfall mercury dry deposition in the eastern USA. Environ Pollut 2012, 161:284-290.
18. Swartzendruber P., Jaffe D.A., Prestbo E.M., Smith J.E. Weiss-Penzias P. Selin NE et al. Observations of reactive gaseous mercury at Mt. Bachelor Observatory. J Geophys Res 2006, 111:D24301. 10.1029/2006JD007415.
19. Velente R.J., Shea C., Humes K.L., Tanner R.L. Atmospheric mercury in the Great Smoky Mountains compared to regional and global levels. Atmos Environ 2007, 41:1861-1873.
20. Winalski D., Mayson S., Savitz J. Poison plants: chlorine factories are a major global source of mercury. Oceana 2005.
21. Weiss-Penzias P., Gustin M.S., Lyman S.N. Observations of speciated atmospheric mercury at three sites in Nevada: evidence for a free tropospheric sources of reactice gaseous mercury. J Geophys Res 2009, 114:D14302. 10.1029/2008JD011607.
22. Wesely M.L. Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical-models. Atmos Environ 1989, 23:1293-1304.
23. Zhang L., Blanchard P., Johnson D., Dastoor A., Ryzhkov A., Lin C.-J., et al. Assessment of modelled mercury deposition over the Great Lakes region. Environ Pollut 2011, 159. 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.06.003.
24. Zhang L., Brook J.R., Vet R. A revised parameterization for gaseous dry deposition in air-quality models. Atmos Chem Phys 2003, 3:2067-2082.
25. Zhang L., Moran M.D., Makar P.A., Brook J.R., Gong S. Modelling gaseous dry deposition in AURAMS: a unified regional air-quality modelling system. Atmos Environ 2002, 36:537-560.
26. Zhang L., Wright L.P., Blanchard P. A review of current knowledge concerning dry deposition of atmospheric mercury. Atmos Environ 2009, 43:5853-5864.