A fully automated method for ct-on-rails-guided online adaptive planning for prostate cancer intensity modulated radiation therapy

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 86, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 835-841

  Li, Xiaoqiang ^a   Quan, Enzhuo M ^a   Li, Yupeng ^a   Pan, Xiaoning ^b   Zhou, Yin ^a   Wang, Xiaochun ^a   Du, Weiliang ^a   Kudchadker, Rajat J ^a   Johnson, Jennifer L ^a   Kuban, Deborah A ^a   Lee, Andrew K ^a   Zhang, Xiaodong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED; CONVENTIONAL METHODS; CRITICAL STRUCTURES; DEFORMABLE IMAGE REGISTRATION; DOSE-VOLUME HISTOGRAMS; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY; METHODS AND MATERIALS; TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEMS;

AUTOMATION; DISEASES; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSICAL THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; UROLOGY;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATED ADAPTIVE PLANNING; AUTOMATION; BLADDER; CENTER OF THE VOLUME; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSIMETRY; FEMUR HEAD; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTION; RADIATION DOSE FRACTIONATION; RECTUM; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ALGORITHMS; DOSE FRACTIONATION; FEMUR HEAD; HUMANS; MALE; ORGAN SPARING TREATMENTS; ORGANS AT RISK; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIATION INJURIES; RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOTHERAPY, INTENSITY-MODULATED; RECTUM; URINARY BLADDER;

EID: 84880046797     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: 1879355X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. J.M. Balter, H.M. Sandler, and K. Lam Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31 1995 113 118
2. D.A. Jaffray, J.H. Siewerdsen, and J.W. Wong Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53 2002 1337 1349 (Pubitemid 34787872)
3. L. Court, I. Rosen, and R. Mohan Evaluation of mechanical precision and alignment uncertainties for an integrated CT/LINAC system Med Phys 30 2003 1198 1210 (Pubitemid 36735986)
4. J.R. Wong, L. Grimm, and M. Uematsu Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer by CT-linear accelerator combination: prostate movements and dosimetric considerations Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61 2005 561 569 (Pubitemid 40164454)
5. H. Wang, L. Dong, and J. O'Daniel Validation of an accelerated "demons" algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy Phys Med Biol 50 2005 2887 2905 (Pubitemid 40771018)
6. X.D. Zhang, X.Q. Li, and E.Z.M. Quan A methodology for automatic intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning for lung cancer Phys Med Biol 56 2011 3873 3893
7. E.M. Quan, X. Li, and Y. Li A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83 2012 1169 1178
8. K.H. Zou, S.K. Warfield, and A. Bharatha Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index - scientific reports Acad Radiol 11 2004 178 189 (Pubitemid 38140289)
9. S. Gaede, J. Olsthoorn, and A.V. Louie An evaluation of an automated 4D-CT contour propagation tool to define an internal gross tumour volume for lung cancer radiotherapy Radiother Oncol 101 2011 322 328
10. H. Wang, L. Dong, and M.F. Lii Implementation and validation of a three-dimensional deformable registration algorithm for targeted prostate cancer radiotherapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61 2005 725 735 (Pubitemid 40247966)
11. T.E. Schultheiss, W.A. Tome, and C.G. Orton It is not appropriate to "deform" dose along with deformable image registration in adaptive radiotherapy Med Phys 39 2012 6531 6533
12. M.J. Murphy, Z. Wei, and M. Fatyga How does CT image noise affect 3D deformable image registration for image-guided radiotherapy planning? Med Phys 35 2008 1145 1153 (Pubitemid 351322660)
13. S. Nithiananthan, S. Schafer, and A. Uneri Demons deformable registration of CT and cone-beam CT using an iterative intensity matching approach Med Phys 38 2011 1785 1798
14. M. Thor, J.B.B. Petersen, and L. Bentzen Deformable image registration for contour propagation from CT to cone-beam CT scans in radiotherapy of prostate cancer Acta Oncologica 50 2011 918 925
15. Y. Yang, E. Schreibmann, and T.F. Li Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation Phys Med Biol 52 2007 685 705 (Pubitemid 46646440)
16. A. Richter, Q. Hu, and D. Steglich Investigation of the usability of conebeam CT data sets for dose calculation Radiation Oncology 3 2008 42
17. R. Mohan, X.D. Zhang, and H. Wang Use of deformed intensity distributions for on-line modification of image-guided IMRT to account for interfractional anatomic changes Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61 2005 1258 1266 (Pubitemid 40340922)
18. Y.M. Feng, C. Castro-Pareja, and R. Shekhar Direct aperture deformation: an interfraction image guidance strategy Med Phys 33 2006 4490 4498 (Pubitemid 44868085)
19. A. Mestrovic, M.P. Milette, and A. Nichol Direct aperture optimization for online adaptive radiation therapy Med Phys 34 2007 1631 1646 (Pubitemid 46671368)
20. Q.J. Wu, D. Thongphiew, and Z. Wang On-line re-optimization of prostate IMRT plans for adaptive radiation therapy Phys Med Biol 53 2008 673 691 (Pubitemid 351496212)
21. E.E. Ahunbay, C. Peng, and S. Holmes Online adaptive replanning method for prostate radiotherapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77 2010 1561 1572